Vortex RazorHD Gen III 6-36x56 vs NF ATACR 7-35x56

Also deciding between these two optics. Razor at 2700 and NF at 2500. Thoughts? Any ideas why the Razor fell off in PRS?
Both great Optically with a slight edge to the Razor, The NF paralax is quick and easy, also the NF is a little lighter. Not a fan of the Razor turrets, the NF is just better turret wise for me.

Not to throw a grenade in here but I think the Element Theos beats both those optics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rothgyr
I’m in analysis paralysis with these 2 scopes. I don’t feel like I can justify a zco right now so NF and G3R are my options. I looked at element as well but I’ve never had the chance to interact with one in person. I can get the razor for slightly less than the NF but the difference isn’t large enough to swing my decision..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sako man
I’m in analysis paralysis with these 2 scopes. I don’t feel like I can justify a zco right now so NF and G3R are my options. I looked at element as well but I’ve never had the chance to interact with one in person. I can get the razor for slightly less than the NF but the difference isn’t large enough to swing my decision..
It's difficult when your hard earned cash is on the line, right!

I have had all three, I still have the Theos on my SRS, great for 338lm with it's 36x mag and it's still usable at the top, I am considering picking up a second one, the prices on those are great. Also the tracking on the Theos is perfect, some other reviewers have said it's be best tracking optic they have tested. I felt like the NF kinda lost me after 30-32x. You can't go wrong with either three, however I will say it again. I do not like the RG3 turrets or it's weight. I did a comparo between the Razor and the Theos, they are made at the same factory, and are dimensionally identical, I think it's the same tube actually and some of the same lense elements so both offer excellent glass. The Theos turrets are honestly the best next to the TT, so easy to set and without a tool. Somehow the Theos is lighter however. The nice thing about NF however is that they have a wider verity of reticles, if you like simple the Mil-R or Mil-C is clean and easy. I would put it like this- the Theos and NF are equal but for different reasons, the Vortex would be my third pick of the three. If warranty is a big factor for you then my clear pick would be NF before the Theos as NF will fix your stuff state side, where the Element Theos will get fixed here as well but is a much smaller outfit at least in the states. The Vortex has a killer warranty but once again it would be my last pick for the other reasons I mentioned earlier.

here is a very extensive review of the Theos.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rothgyr and YotaEer
The Gen III was awesome at sub $2K but now with their crazy price increase I don’t know.

I really enjoy the NF 7-35 but I DO NOT like the 12 Mil turrets. Shooting centerfire not that big of a deal but rimfire and you end up all jacked up.

It is a crazy day when the NF can be had for probably $300-$500 less then a vortex.
 
The Gen III was awesome at sub $2K but now with their crazy price increase I don’t know.

I really enjoy the NF 7-35 but I DO NOT like the 12 Mil turrets. Shooting centerfire not that big of a deal but rimfire and you end up all jacked up.

It is a crazy day when the NF can be had for probably $300-$500 less then a vortex.


The Gen III was never Sub $2k officially as that is less than dealer’s cost, Scott at LO programmed many to believe that. But…

Some people did get free ones at matches and flip them or some people grabbed 50% off certificates on the prize tables.

All the above happened at a large scale and devalued the Gen III unfortunately, which is a fantastic scope under $3k.

Now Scott seems to be on the run and Vortex’s sales are hurting, IMO the best thing to do is not repeat lines like this, “ The Gen III was awesome at sub $2K but now with their crazy price increase I don’t know. ”

Their MAP pricing never changed, their MSRP to calculate discounts has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emerson0311
It's difficult when your hard earned cash is on the line, right!

I have had all three, I still have the Theos on my SRS, great for 338lm with it's 36x mag and it's still usable at the top, I am considering picking up a second one, the prices on those are great. Also the tracking on the Theos is perfect, some other reviewers have said it's be best tracking optic they have tested. I felt like the NF kinda lost me after 30-32x. You can't go wrong with either three, however I will say it again. I do not like the RG3 turrets or it's weight. I did a comparo between the Razor and the Theos, they are made at the same factory, and are dimensionally identical, I think it's the same tube actually and some of the same lense elements so both offer excellent glass. The Theos turrets are honestly the best next to the TT, so easy to set and without a tool. Somehow the Theos is lighter however. The nice thing about NF however is that they have a wider verity of reticles, if you like simple the Mil-R or Mil-C is clean and easy. I would put it like this- the Theos and NF are equal but for different reasons, the Vortex would be my third pick of the three. If warranty is a big factor for you then my clear pick would be NF before the Theos as NF will fix your stuff state side, where the Element Theos will get fixed here as well but is a much smaller outfit at least in the states. The Vortex has a killer warranty but once again it would be my last pick for the other reasons I mentioned earlier.

here is a very extensive review of the Theos.


That Element Theos looks like it has some of the same features as the NF ATACR, Trijicon Ten Mile, and Vortex Razor G3. I'm thinking they are all basically made at the same factory (someone please correct me and shed some light if I'm mistaken). So if that is the case, then it should be a pretty good performer. I have the other three, just not a Theos.

I watched some of the video (can't stomach Gavin schilling all that much), and definitely noticed the similarities. The reticle is basically the same as the Razor, but with the horizontal cross hair flipped. The 12 mil turrets and capped windage are like the NF. And the tooless zero is like the Trijicon. Plus it is roughly the same size. I'd have to monkey with it to see what the closest comparison is for the feel of the magnification, parallax, and turrets (but I'm guessing it is close to the others too...with the exception of the NF magnification).

If one didn't know and were able to identify reticles...I bet I could stick most people behind the other three and they'd have a hard time picking which was "best".

In which case, unless one hated or loved a particular feature...price point might be the biggest determining factor, as quality is going to be extremely close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sako man
The Gen III was never Sub $2k officially as that is less than dealer’s cost, Scott at LO programmed many to believe that. But…

Some people did get free ones at matches and flip them or some people grabbed 50% off certificates on the prize tables.

All the above happened at a large scale and devalued the Gen III unfortunately, which is a fantastic scope under $3k.

Now Scott seems to be on the run and Vortex’s sales are hurting, IMO the best thing to do is not repeat lines like this, “ The Gen III was awesome at sub $2K but now with their crazy price increase I don’t know. ”

Their MAP pricing never changed, their MSRP to calculate discounts has.

That Element Theos looks like it has some of the same features as the NF ATACR, Trijicon Ten Mile, and Vortex Razor G3. I'm thinking they are all basically made at the same factory (someone please correct me and shed some light if I'm mistaken). So if that is the case, then it should be a pretty good performer. I have the other three, just not a Theos.

I watched some of the video (can't stomach Gavin schilling all that much), and definitely noticed the similarities. The reticle is basically the same as the Razor, but with the horizontal cross hair flipped. The 12 mil turrets and capped windage are like the NF. And the tooless zero is like the Trijicon. Plus it is roughly the same size. I'd have to monkey with it to see what the closest comparison is for the feel of the magnification, parallax, and turrets (but I'm guessing it is close to the others too...with the exception of the NF magnification).

If one didn't know and were able to identify reticles...I bet I could stick most people behind the other three and they'd have a hard time picking which was "best".

In which case, unless one hated or loved a particular feature...price point might be the biggest determining factor, as quality is going to be extremely close.

My perspective is from the consumer, not the seller. So take it for what it's worth.

To me this explains why the market share dropped on the Gen3 6-36. It was the cream of the crop when you could buy it at under 2k.

They are just another data point at sub 3k. At the current price you need to start finding features you like or dislike, brand loyalty, warranty, customer support, etc all plays into it. They are still competing, I don't find any fault with my Gen3 6-36 or gen2 4.5-27 for that matter. If they are side by side I do prefer the NF by a small margin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rothgyr
My perspective is from the consumer, not the seller. So take it for what it's worth.

To me this explains why the market share dropped on the Gen3 6-36. It was the cream of the crop when you could buy it at under 2k.

They are just another data point at sub 3k. At the current price you need to start finding features you like or dislike, brand loyalty, warranty, customer support, etc all plays into it. They are still competing, I don't find any fault with my Gen3 6-36 or gen2 4.5-27 for that matter. If they are side by side I do prefer the NF by a small margin.


Well it does matter when consumers want a price that's better than what a dealer gets it for which has happened hundreds of times to me personally. There's no way a dealer can stay in business by selling items to customer's for hundred's of dollars less than what they pay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jbuck88
It's difficult when your hard earned cash is on the line, right!

I have had all three, I still have the Theos on my SRS, great for 338lm with it's 36x mag and it's still usable at the top, I am considering picking up a second one, the prices on those are great. Also the tracking on the Theos is perfect, some other reviewers have said it's be best tracking optic they have tested. I felt like the NF kinda lost me after 30-32x. You can't go wrong with either three, however I will say it again. I do not like the RG3 turrets or it's weight. I did a comparo between the Razor and the Theos, they are made at the same factory, and are dimensionally identical, I think it's the same tube actually and some of the same lense elements so both offer excellent glass. The Theos turrets are honestly the best next to the TT, so easy to set and without a tool. Somehow the Theos is lighter however. The nice thing about NF however is that they have a wider verity of reticles, if you like simple the Mil-R or Mil-C is clean and easy. I would put it like this- the Theos and NF are equal but for different reasons, the Vortex would be my third pick of the three. If warranty is a big factor for you then my clear pick would be NF before the Theos as NF will fix your stuff state side, where the Element Theos will get fixed here as well but is a much smaller outfit at least in the states. The Vortex has a killer warranty but once again it would be my last pick for the other reasons I mentioned earlier.

here is a very extensive review of the Theos.

Guess I should have added this will be going my V22 for PRS/NRL matches.
 
Also deciding between these two optics. Razor at 2700 and NF at 2500. Thoughts? Any ideas why the Razor fell off in PRS?

Well it does matter when consumers want a price that's better than what a dealer gets it for which has happened hundreds of times to me personally. There's no way a dealer can stay in business by selling items to customer's for hundred's of dollars less than what they pay.

I 100% get and understand what you are saying. I have friends who fell victim to Scott. However I was trying to respond to why the g3 might have fell off in PRS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CSTactical
I’m in analysis paralysis with these 2 scopes. I don’t feel like I can justify a zco right now so NF and G3R are my options. I looked at element as well but I’ve never had the chance to interact with one in person. I can get the razor for slightly less than the NF but the difference isn’t large enough to swing my decision..
Let me help you a bit. If you are ok with both reticles and locking elevation/rotating eyepiece isn’t a deal-breaker, here are some links to tests on the two scopes: flare, mirage, low light

FLARE​

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11733409/

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11733620/

https://www.snipershide.com/shootin...son-from-kinetics-security-solutions.7131466/ (this is more than a flare test)


MIRAGE​

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/which-nightforce-hellllp.7218751/#post-11578868

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11735170/

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11736058/


LOW LIGHT​

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11551339/

https://www.snipershide.com/shootin...5-vs-arken-ep5-last-light-comparison.7185836/

A lot of these links go to posts by @R_A_W, but not all. @hafejd30 is in there too. I’ve chatted with both of them as well over dm’s. Since flare control is pretty important to me (yes, I always use sun shades), I am leaning away from the G3 and towards a NF 7-35.

I’d prefer a ZCO or a March, as they reportedly have even better flare control. I love the industrial design and feel of my S&B 5-25, so their 6-36 is of interest. But the scope tech (Jerry) recently left USA HQ and now scopes need to be sent back to Germany, plus its flare control is reportedly worse than the NF. My 5-25 is quite poor in that area.

Plus I’d prefer that the #FOVgate Swaro brouhaha passes and S&B is allowed to uncork the USA versions of the 6-36. Although there is that 5-45…hmmmm

Regardless, I’m not ready to drop that amount of coin for incremental optical gains over the NF 7-35. Not yet, anyway.

Edit: I know @Glassaholic and @koshkin also have good reviews on those two, some with those two scopes head to head. I just don’t have time right now to find and link to them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: R_A_W
The Gen III was never Sub $2k officially as that is less than dealer’s cost, Scott at LO programmed many to believe that. But…

Some people did get free ones at matches and flip them or some people grabbed 50% off certificates on the prize tables.

All the above happened at a large scale and devalued the Gen III unfortunately, which is a fantastic scope under $3k.

Now Scott seems to be on the run and Vortex’s sales are hurting, IMO the best thing to do is not repeat lines like this, “ The Gen III was awesome at sub $2K but now with their crazy price increase I don’t know. ”

Their MAP pricing never changed, their MSRP to calculate discounts has.
When it launched, it was standard to get one for $2100. Rare is the guy that's buying Nightforce, vortex, Leupold, USO, etc for regular pricing. Everyone knows what the mil/leo or cert prices are. The used prices on all of these is reflected.

On launch, every video on it talked about it being a $2k tangent. It was suddenly stupid to buy an $1800 xtr pro, $1900 FDN, $1800 mk5, $2700 atacr, $3200 kahles, etc., because *for the price* the g3 out performed everything. Yes, MSRP was $4k, but only chumps at Cabela's we're buying moa ones at MSRP.

MSRP hike puts it where it should have been all along. I'm keeping my atacr, because I like the reticle and controls (and color).

The group think and hype around the g3 were real, and it threw a wrench in the
market share.
 
Guess I should have added this will be going my V22 for PRS/NRL matches.
If that's a rimfire then the the theos is great as it focuses down to ten yards, I can watch ants in my backyard, crazy. I think on paper there is 32mils of internal adjustment but people have pointed out there's actually 36, a little odd.
 
Let me help you a bit. If you are ok with both reticles and locking elevation/rotating eyepiece isn’t a deal-breaker, here are some links to tests on the two scopes: flare, mirage, low light

FLARE​

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11733409/

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11733620/

https://www.snipershide.com/shootin...son-from-kinetics-security-solutions.7131466/ (this is more than a flare test)


MIRAGE​

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/which-nightforce-hellllp.7218751/#post-11578868

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11735170/

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11736058/


LOW LIGHT​

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/posts/11551339/

https://www.snipershide.com/shootin...5-vs-arken-ep5-last-light-comparison.7185836/

A lot of these links go to posts by @R_A_W, but not all. @hafejd30 is in there too. I’ve chatted with both of them as well over dm’s. Since flare control is pretty important to me (yes, I always use sun shades), I am leaning away from the G3 and towards a NF 7-35.

I’d prefer a ZCO or a March, as they reportedly have even better flare control. I love the industrial design and feel of my S&B 5-25, so their 6-36 is of interest. But the scope tech (Jerry) recently left USA HQ and now scopes need to be sent back to Germany, plus its flare control is reportedly worse than the NF. My 5-25 is quite poor in that area.

Plus I’d prefer that the #FOVgate Swaro brouhaha passes and S&B is allowed to uncork the USA versions of the 6-36. Although there is that 5-45…hmmmm

Regardless, I’m not ready to drop that amount of coin for incremental optical gains over the NF 7-35. Not yet, anyway.

Edit: I know @Glassaholic and @koshkin also have good reviews on those two, some with those two scopes head to head. I just don’t have time right now to find and link to them.
Does SnB still have a service center here in the US? That's a big deal to a lot of people if they dont....as you know. :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: carbonbased
When it launched, it was standard to get one for $2100. Rare is the guy that's buying Nightforce, vortex, Leupold, USO, etc for regular pricing. Everyone knows what the mil/leo or cert prices are. The used prices on all of these is reflected.

On launch, every video on it talked about it being a $2k tangent. It was suddenly stupid to buy an $1800 xtr pro, $1900 FDN, $1800 mk5, $2700 atacr, $3200 kahles, etc., because *for the price* the g3 out performed everything. Yes, MSRP was $4k, but only chumps at Cabela's we're buying moa ones at MSRP.

MSRP hike puts it where it should have been all along. I'm keeping my atacr, because I like the reticle and controls (and color).

The group think and hype around the g3 were real, and it threw a wrench in the
market share.

I never go off the MSRP for Vortex unless calculating the gov pricing which did pring the price down to lower in the $2kish range as everyone knows., MAP price is $2,999.99 then and now. You're being too literal about it being the ~$2kish Tangent that you are referring to. $2kish is a range of $2,000 to $2,999.99. I'm not saying I saw every video, but I've seen many as this is kind of what we do. I'm not in this world casually and I have a pretty good memory (Not Rainman level lol)

Details matter


-Richard
 
Does SnB still have a service center here in the US? That's a big deal to a lot of people if they dont....as you know. :)
Yeah, now which thread was that talked about ad nauseam… 🫠 lol

S&B DID have a long-standing and excellent USA service center until very recently. Jerry left in some manner and POOF! it’s apparently gone!
 
Yeah, now which thread was that on… 🫠

They DID have a long-standing and excellent USA service center until very recently. Jerry left in some manner and POOF! it’s apparently gone!
Lol, right which thread? Funny how March got blasted for the same reason and here we are with the gold standard of optics, that's news to me. Fantastic product, the 5-25 is still relevant and can be had used sub 3k.... people don't want to send their stuff to Japan, Germany is worse IMHO. That's probably going to effect sales I imagine?
 
That's probably going to effect sales I imagine?
I would think. I’d be amazed if that was not the case.

As the single biggest market for firearms accessories in the world, it sorta boggles the mind to not have a US based service center. Especially for expensive stuff.

Perhaps there’s some data that we don’t know, like S&B/Swaro and Swaro’s Kahles etc just sell more in Europe because grubby Americans don’t buy as much of their product as the Euros do?