The Dems want to blame the right and guns for most if not all of America's "gun violence", but they never want to talk about the person behind the trigger unless that person comes out to be a so called right leaning white supremacist (which it very seldom does) any other time not one mention of the POS pulling the trigger. The media will never call them out on the fact that the majority of the "gun violence" is a direct result of the democratic social policies of all these democratic run shithole cities. I know I am preaching to the choir here, but what the fuck is it going to take for people straddling the fence to wake the fuck up.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
We don't have a gun problem we have a Democratic run cities problem.
- Thread starter Steel+Killer
- Start date
Malcolm-X called it…
Right before the liberal-industrial-complex shot him.
Read his autobiography everyone. He was a smart man. Some controversial opinions. But I don’t think he was wrong!
Sirhr
Right before the liberal-industrial-complex shot him.
Read his autobiography everyone. He was a smart man. Some controversial opinions. But I don’t think he was wrong!
Sirhr
With all the freebies leftys live in a make-believe world. Leftism cannot exist in the real world. That's why you only find it in colleges, inner city shitholes, and other artificial environments.
Remove the freebies and reality will let the stupidity cure itself.
Remove the freebies and reality will let the stupidity cure itself.
For democrats human life is an end to a means. People are sacrificed to achieve an agenda.
Is there a single example of an area that was a poverty sticken, crime infested wasteland that was turned around by lefty policies? The reverse can be shown all day. Formerly prosperous areas turned into slums after adopting lefty policies. Chicago, Detroit, Philly, Memphis, Baltimore, etc.
Elvis's song "In the ghetto" was released in 1969, yet after 50+ years of uninterrupted democrat control, it's just as applicable today.
Dems have run every inner city slum for decades, yet has never fixed a single one.
You can try to explain it being bad luck, but since the last Republican mayor of Chicago left office in 1931, it's hard to argue poverty isn't an intentional result of dems.
The old saying is democrats are for the poor, and Republicans for the rich. The hidden implication of that saying is dems have a vested interest in maintaining and expanding the poverty class, lest they lose their constituency. It's the only thing they've successfully done.
Elvis's song "In the ghetto" was released in 1969, yet after 50+ years of uninterrupted democrat control, it's just as applicable today.
Dems have run every inner city slum for decades, yet has never fixed a single one.
You can try to explain it being bad luck, but since the last Republican mayor of Chicago left office in 1931, it's hard to argue poverty isn't an intentional result of dems.
The old saying is democrats are for the poor, and Republicans for the rich. The hidden implication of that saying is dems have a vested interest in maintaining and expanding the poverty class, lest they lose their constituency. It's the only thing they've successfully done.
As long as the 'free stuff' keeps flowing, there is no incentive to wake up. You want to see rioting? Just try to cut it off.
There are a lot of liberals that defend that type of behavior, but would be in for a very rude awakening if shit was to ever really hit the fan in a major US city they would learn real quick just how “misunderstood” the animals are.
