Re: What bullets are your favorite for target .308 WIN
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MinorDamage</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Blackops_2</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MinorDamage</div><div class="ubbcode-body">155 scenar or 175/178. If you are wanting to shoot past 600-800 you will not like the 168s.
Josh</div></div>
I've been interesting in testing out a 168gr VLD, if you could get em around 2750+ i think they would retain enough energy to do pretty decent @ 1000. Unless it's something else that's effecting the 168s ability to lose stability @ 1000 other than it's BC. </div></div>
I should have specified. Above someone pointed out the 168 SMK. That one will not get you to 1000. The 168 VLD may, but it is just an affect of form factor vs the G7 standard. The 155 scenar has a hollow nose which allows it to be much longer and sleeker at a lower mass. However, the 168 does not and is hindered by having a poor form factor along with its lower weight. The 175 is better in both respects.
Josh </div></div>
It is my understanding that it is the boat angle that causes the instability (13 degrees=too steep). But it likely is a combo of several factors. It ultimately depends on altitude, temp and baro pressure when launched at 308 velocities and where the transonic zone will be. If you live at a high enough altitude it will work fine. I have had similar problems with 155 a-max as well and it shares the steep boat tail @ 13.5 degrees. As long as it remains supersonic, its fine. No worries with 168 VLD bergers, super or sub-sonic in my experience.