What would YOU want Trump's new DOJ to attack?

UKDslayer

Private
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Jan 29, 2005
    17,072
    35,920
    Texas
    So of course the deep state and everyone in Biden's DOJ is supposedly working overtime to furiously destroy all evidence of their activities to make any prosecutions or even to keep their deeds from being exposed to the US citizen. What do YOU want to see Trump's new DOJ tackle, since we know the congressional oversight committees are good at theater but never accomplished anything? What would be considered water under the bridge versus necessary to ensure the will of the people and try to resume the vision our founding fathers had for America? Will Congress and deep state entities prevent any consequences, even if the truths come out?

    I'll start with: weaponization of the courts through the influence of George and Alexander Soros as well as other globalists.

    Release of Covid – planned or lab accident? And of course everything about the creation of Covid as a bioweapon. Depopulation agenda?
     
    Illegals
    Schools and woke agenda
    Military and woke agenda
    Build gallows to hang all the people from Epstein and diddys lists.
    Try and execute everyone for the past 3 years of selling our country out.
    Try and execute all those who voted to send American dollars overseas
    Try and execute to all the millionaires in Congress
    Any doctor that did gender reassignment surgeries

    These are in no specific order.

    And so on and so on.....


    Doc
     
    No one..it’s a waste and fixes nothing for the future. Gear Hillary is in jail..does nothing but a headline. Just wasted tax dollars and time that could be used somewhere else

    Turn them into internal affairs and smoke out all the scum in the swamp. Like that woman who said pass over Trump houses after hurricane.

    Put them to find all those emails and fire those people , find out who leaked Supreme Court info last year.

    Clean out the scum and the government will work a hell of a lot better for the citizens.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: mtrmn
    TzZrMXQjaIPr.jpeg
     
    The existing DOJ is too corrupt to be trusted to prosecute anything. Every federal agency with regulatory power must be torn down and burned. Never again give unelected POSs any power to make up their own laws as they go. Only congress should have the power to make laws. The AFT is a glaring example. Seemingly small stuff like the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network threatening all small businesses which are incorporated with a $500/day fine for simply not knowing that they have to be registered by Jan 1. There are times when my little LLC won't make that much in a month, much less in a day. It's just another scheme to destroy small business and collapse the system even more.
     
    Some of the things listed or implied are a moot point. 2020 election was stolen and everyone knows that. J6 was a set-up and everyone knows that. It might be nice pursuing that only because people are still in jail or serving time who do not deserve to do so.

    What is the statute of limitations on Clinton's misuse of emails and servers? Again, that might too long gone to effectively do anything and it will hang around her like Chappaquiddick hung around Sen. Kennedy. That pretty much stopped him from ever being president.

    So, a more effective use might be looking into the actions of the Biden Admin and the mass immigration and the dereliction of duty by "Border Czar" VP Harris.

    What might be more of use is if anyone is moving against our control of the border, investigate them.

    While we are at it, send NG troops down there to guard the border instead of holding it open. Close the border down. We are being invaded and it needs to be treated as an invasion.

    Even mo' better-er. Release the DOJ upon the ATF and make them sweat. Make the ATF hide their dogs for a change. Reason? Violation of Amendments 1, 2, 4 to start.
     
    Even mo' better-er. Release the DOJ upon the ATF and make them sweat. Make the ATF hide their dogs for a change. Reason? Violation of Amendments 1, 2, 4 to start.
    Releasing the DOJ ain't gonna do shit, they're more guilty than the intended targets.

    Otherwise, I agree with the rest of your post.
     
    as above. using the doj likely be tried but useless. it is a huge part of the problem. doubt any non corrupt agents or lawyers exist in it. what is really needed is so far out of the rule of law that using it successfully would destroy the constitution that needs saving. to whit-a revolutionary tribunal. it might be desirable to set up something like the nuremburg tribunal. having charges brought,lawyers used,evidence presented but charges being crimes against humanity,the citizenry,original intentions of founders. corruption,using illegal means to do the deep states work.violation of rights,making up laws and enforcing them with violence. anything that would clean out the deep state will be fought hard by the uniparty. we are seeing that already. might try investigating soros,gates and fauci just for grins but results would be stone walled. there are so many guilty that mass executions and concentration camps would be needed. that would ruin us even if the deep state was eliminated. actually that was and is the plan of those who need prosecution-extermination and gulag like imprisonment of decent americans of any color,ethnicity or creed.
    i sure don't have any sane ideas and lack faith in the system.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: mtrmn
    DoJ needs to perform a full court press on the media and tech companies for election interference. A whole lot of people need to go to jail for things like tampering with search results to benefit Democrats as well as the media outright lying like when CBS actually altered Kamala Harris's 60 minutes interview to make her appear like she wasn't speaking gibberish.
     
    Ok, we'll start with this, I grew up in a middle-class household, and my mother was a hard working middle-class woman so I know a lot about the middle-class.

    I'm of simple stock so I'll just go with this- how is it that a single profession that makes an annual salary of $174K, all while paying Federal/State/Local income taxes (DC taxes to boot), Social Security Taxes, Medicare taxes, Unemployment taxes, Disability taxes, etc. AND presumably also pays into Health/Dental/Vision Insurance AND also likely has retirement contributions withheld AND likely maintains a residence in Washington DC (and not a single one in this profession is staying in any ghettos) as well as an opulent residence in their home state...

    Sorry had to take a quick pause there to catch my breath on just the most basic and obvious deductions from their paychecks, but how in the world do they have the margin to afford all these things and consistently become multimillionaires within the first 4-6 years of being on the job? To pull the veil back a little bit further, how is it that these publicly elected/public servants (yes I'm talking about politicians) are able to amass this wealth without anyone giving it a second thought or any measurable amount of scrutiny of concern that they've been bought and paid for and created a serious conflict of interest? And how is it that it doesn't matter whether there's an 'R' or a 'D' after their name, they all seem to fall into the same luck?

    I'm being a bit cheeky in my comment but until we can account for this phenomenon, I don't personally think we're ever going to be able to solve any other problems. George Carlin talked about this years ago and it's only gotten worse, and nobody seems to care. Follow the money, it's a big club and you & I aren't in it.

    -LD
     
    Well, just playing Devils Advocate here, as I certainly don't doubt stock trading corruption (Pelosi). Many of the people we send to Washington were already millionaires before being elected. Just an example, how did Burgum, governor of North Dakota, get rich on a governor's salary? He built a software company and sold to Microsoft for 1.1 billion.
     
    Go after the Drug Cartels flowing Fentanyl and other chemicals across the Borders, especially anyone in official/gov positions supporting this. Secure the Borders.

    Expel all the catch and release Migrants and change our Asylum laws so they can not be abused like they currently are.

    I don't like the Idea of weaponizing the DOJ like the Dems did against political opponents, don't become the evil that you hate. But do air out their use of it in this regard, while not crossing that line. Don't follow their precedent. But at the same time rooting out corruption equally.

    Secure the 2A.

    Secure Election, State issued Photo ID and you vote in person while creating a system to confirm your vote was accurately counted.

    Protect the 1A. Even if people are completely full of shit and lying, you are free to do and act as you choose, allow people to self assess ie "fact check". Get government agency's out of controlling media and limiting free speech.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: theLBC
    Well, just playing Devils Advocate here, as I certainly don't doubt stock trading corruption (Pelosi). Many of the people we send to Washington were already millionaires before being elected. Just an example, how did Burgum, governor of North Dakota, get rich on a governor's salary? He built a software company and sold to Microsoft for 1.1 billion.
    That's both a fair and valid point. I likely should have/could have worded my response better. If you'll allow me to rephrase- I would like to see a far greater degree of scrutiny when it comes to the personal financial gains of elected officials primarily tasked as playing the role of an independent 'watchdog' ensuring that their seats/positions of power isn't being used/abused in unethical or otherwise illegal manners through mechanisms that include (but not limited to) insider trading, bribery, 'pay to play' schemes, vote selling, etc. I would also like to see potential conflicts of interest taken into account for votes on legislation where elected officials with financial stakes (either through personal investments or close associations directly impacted) is addressed. I'm just spitballing at this point but maybe for pieces of legislation that surpasses a certain threshold there's an equivalent of a noncompete clause as with employment contracts where participation in voting prohibits them from possessing or acquiring assets directly impacted by the legislation for a set amount of time.

    Hopefully that's phrased a bit better this time around but appreciate your response either way.

    -LD