Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

Wannashootit

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Sep 3, 2010
    2,257
    566
    FL
    I have the new 2011 Hodgdon Reloading magazine.

    It tells me, on page 115, that the starting and max loads for the Sierra 168 gr., .308 are 42.0 and 46.0 of Varget.

    The Sierra reloading manual, page 539, tells me the starting and max loads are 38.7, and 43.5...

    This is one hell of a difference.
    Do I need glasses? I've looked at it five times and it reads the same. Someone please tell me I'm not nutz...
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Both could be correct. Load development depends on a lot of variables. The lesson is to understand how many variables there are.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Sierra manual is RETARDEDLY conservative.

    Hodgdon makes the fucking powder, I'd go by their data. Personally, I've found it to be extremely accurate.

    You, however, are free to do whatever makes you feel safe.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Ya I soon went out and bought the Lyman manual after I had bought the sierra one


    The Lyman stats are close to the hog recomendarions

    Lyman saya 41--45.7 varget for a 168 Hpbt

    The 45.7 is marked as a compresed load with 61100 psi


    I just started loading varget w/ 168,s. And began at 42 grains and working up

    Some folks around here say 43-44.5 is the sweet spot for varget
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Sierra manual is RETARDEDLY conservative.
    [snip] </div></div>

    I used to think so.

    Then I tried 48.3 of Ball-C(2) under a 155-grain A-Max in .308, and was 3 shots into an amazing 2969 fps average from a 22-inch barrel and had smoke curling from the primer pocket of shot #3.

    Sierra max for that bullet weight is 48.4 (yeah, I went a whopping .1 gr below max). I was using the same cases and "not hot" primers--CCI 200s.

    Sierra said 48.4 should yield about 2900 with a 26-inch barrel, four inches longer than mine...

    Pretty much convinced me to:
    A. load to velocity, specifically for my barrel length; and

    B. not trust what Snipers Hide posters say about how fast they can get anything to go at "only" [so far] above "book max".
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Thats why its always best to start low and find out for yourself.

    I still cant understand why the Sierra manual is so conservative... ive heard of under-pressure loads being dangerous, and if Sierras loads are obviously safe, what then counts as under-pressure (in regards to charge weight).
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thats why its always best to start low and find out for yourself.

    I still cant understand why the Sierra manual is so conservative... ive heard of under-pressure loads being dangerous, and if Sierras loads are obviously safe, what then counts as under-pressure (in regards to charge weight). </div></div>

    Starting out low (10%) and working up is a no-brainer even for a relative newb like myself.

    But not knowing what the min and max loads are- even approximately- and I don't mean within 3 grains- is ridiculous.
    That's almost the load spread...

    Loading less than minimum loads is not recommended, either....
    Turned out that 40.0 Varget actually resulted in very tight groups. This is BELOW minimum load in the Hodgdon manual...

    I realize there are variables...
    But these are supposed to account for minor variations, especially with a temperature-stable powder like Varget. These variations aren't minor.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Wannashootit</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have the new 2011 Hodgdon Reloading magazine.

    It tells me, on page 115, that the starting and max loads for the Sierra 168 gr., .308 are 42.0 and 46.0 of Varget.

    The Sierra reloading manual, page 539, tells me the starting and max loads are 38.7, and 43.5...

    This is one hell of a difference.
    Do I need glasses? I've looked at it five times and it reads the same. Someone please tell me I'm not nutz... </div></div>

    Things I've learned over the years,
    Lyman is very good data, if you have a factory length barrel an don't run a can.

    Hodgdon, a little less pressure than Lyman with the same factors.

    Serria, Works great for custom barrel's what have a can hanging on them in hot weather.

    Your best book is made up by you. If you don't understand how to do that, get help or only shoot factory ammo.

    Reloading is somewhat cost effective, and one can tailor their load to that stick for any weather.
    Many get caught with the speed bug when developing a load, the goal is to put the bullet on target.

    Remember, a 22lr in the eye is better than a 50bmg flying by.
    With Fieldcraft an placement the target is yours for the taking, anywhere any time,...
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gunfighter14e2</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
    Remember, a 22lr in the eye is better than a 50bmg flying by.
    </div></div>

    Thats neat Il have to remember that one.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    I avoid using Sierra's data because they are usually conservative.

    My advice would be to stick with the Hodgdon manual, start at their minimum load and work to their maximum. I use Hodgdon's data and the Lyman manual, start at their minimums and work up, and I've never blown my face off. I think that if you started with Sierra's data you would end up with a starting load that's too light.

    I do not recommend starting out with the book maximum, even for allegedly temp insensitive powders like Varget. Every gun is different, so it's best to approach the upper limit for your particular rifle incrementally.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    i dont think sierra is that conservative , though maybe alittle. Case capacity plays a role in max load data , i imagine hodgdon did not list what case was being used and sierra did... my guess is thats the difference.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    "Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?"

    Probably. Or, for you, maybe neither?

    I'm sure they are both correct for their test rifles. Your rifle's a third element in a system already showing the difference between two rifles, different cases, different powder lots, different primers. There's a message in all that and it's NOT that Sierra is being silly conservative with a 5.7% difference.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    It may take some time, but if your reload long enough you begin to understand that Chaos Theory applies nicely to building loads for your rifle.

    Chaos theory studies the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions.

    In Chaos Theory small differences in initial conditions yield widely diverging outcomes for chaotic systems, rendering long-term prediction impossible in general.

    So it is in reloading. We have a complex system of bullet, brass, powder, primer, chamber and barrel all interacting together.

    No two chambers, barrels, powder lots, brass lots, et al are exactly alike. Similar but different.

    So 43.5 grains of Varget for example, might yield 2600 FPS and 58K PSI in one rifle, and 2700 FPS and 63 K PSI in another.

    So which data is right, Hodgdon or Sierra? Both are. But only for the rifles and loads they tested, which will not be the same as your rifle and load your testing.

    Reloading is not pie baking, where if one puts in the right ingredients, and cooks it at the right temperature, the pie will turn out the same, each and every time.

    So what do your do? Well what I do, is take at least two data sources, if I can find them. Then I take the highest MAX load listed, and reduce that by dividing by 110% + or - 3 %, with the goal to achieve a starting load below the MAX and above the MIN of the lower of the available data sources.

    So in your example I would take Hodgdon's MAX load of 46.0 Grains / 110% = 41.8 Grains

    41.8 Grains is below Sierra's Max and above it's MIN, so I would deduce that's a good starting load. It's also only 0.2 grains under Hodgdon's MIN.

    I would then work up from there in no more than 0.5 Grain increments.

    Hope this helps,

    Bob



     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Thanks for the posts. Bob, what you say is certainly logical.

    I don't have a chrono yet. Certainly not because of the $$, they're cheap. Just didn't think I needed one...
    It is my understanding that velocity is not related to accuracy,at least at the short (100-200) yard distances I'm working now.

    So, is velocity a way of determining pressures? If so, then buying one is a no-brainer, right?

    Please- don't tell me to read the manual. If you don't want to answer- don't....

    It's even worse for the 175 SMK's I started loading tonight. The max load from Sierra is less than the minimum load from Hodgdon.

    I understand it is a complicated science. That's why I decided to visit the reloading depot here... for the 175 SMK's, most are shooting 43-45 Varget out of similar bolt guns (Savage).

    So, I'm loading 42, 43, 43.5, 44, and 44.5 for the weekend.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the goal is to put the bullet on target. </div></div>

    For some. For others they want the bullet on target at the highest posible velocity.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    "So, is velocity a way of determining pressures? If so, then buying one is a no-brainer, right?"

    Well, if you load the same bullet in the same cases with the same primer/powder and bullets are the same distance from from the lands and the velocity matches the book you can be fairly sure the pressures are at least nearly the same. But that rarely happens so all a chronograph can really be depended on is to tell us what speeds we are gitting!
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    I called Sierra and asked why their was such a difference between the Lyman manual and the Sierra. The tech told me they noticed during testing the hotter the guns got the higher the higher pressure went and felt their loads were safer under these conditions. I don't load hot loads so it didn't make much difference to me.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Wannashootit</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks for the posts. Bob, what you say is certainly logical.

    I don't have a chrono yet. Certainly not because of the $$, they're cheap. Just didn't think I needed one...
    It is my understanding that velocity is not related to accuracy,at least at the short (100-200) yard distances I'm working now.

    So, is velocity a way of determining pressures? If so, then buying one is a no-brainer, right?

    Please- don't tell me to read the manual. If you don't want to answer- don't....

    It's even worse for the 175 SMK's I started loading tonight. The max load from Sierra is less than the minimum load from Hodgdon.

    I understand it is a complicated science. That's why I decided to visit the reloading depot here... for the 175 SMK's, most are shooting 43-45 Varget out of similar bolt guns (Savage).

    So, I'm loading 42, 43, 43.5, 44, and 44.5 for the weekend. </div></div>

    Wannashootit,

    Your simple statement "...your understanding that velocity is NOT related to accuracy" and your question "..is velocity a way of determining pressures?", are far more complex than you might realize.

    Let's address your first statement: "...your understanding that velocity is NOT related to accuracy".

    First off, velocity of some sort is necessary to get the bullet out of the barrel. Then the bullet must have sufficient velocity to reach the target.

    All this must take place before we can measure a bullets accuracy on a target. So velocity is related to accuracy, and is close coupled with it.

    If ultimate accuracy @ 100 or 200 yds is all that is required, then we only have to contend with the minimum velocity necessary to reach that target. So if the bullet leaves the muzzle @ 2400, 2500, 2600 or 2700 FPS is immaterial, if the desired accuracy is achieved at some point.

    But if we are concerned about the relative accuracy of that bullet at say 1000 yds. then velocity is very much a player.

    For example a 1/2" group @ 100 yds, means nothing, if the bullet cannot reach the target nose on @ 1000 yds, if that is the goal. Better to suffer a load that delivers a 3/4" group @ 100, but can also reach the target and still deliver acceptable accuracy @ 1000 yds.

    I hope I made that understandable.

    Next your question: "..is velocity a way of determining pressures?"

    Yes, but only within a narrow set of circumstances:

    If you loaded 5 rounds with 44, 45, 46, 47, and 48 grains of Varget, in a new Lapua case, with a Fed 210M primer, and a Berger 155.5 Grain 308 bullet, at a COAL of 2.810", and fired them each over a chronograph:

    I would expect to see, increased velocity with each increase in powder. With each increase in velocity there had to be an increase in pressure, because without pressure, there is no velocity.

    But that's all it really tells you. If your goal was to reach say 2900 FPS, and the 48 grain load yields only 2850 FPS, then your faced with upping the load, or being satisfied with what you got. But the velocity in and of itself tells you nothing about whether that 48 grain load is generating 58K PSI or 65 K PSI, or something else.

    Change any component, change seating depth up or down, and you have introduced a new set of variables, and you will also changed the velocity, pressure, accuracy, curve sometimes for the better, and sometimes for the worst.

    The good news out of all of this is, if you use prudent reloading techniques, and start from below and carefully work up, the brass cartridge case will tell you where to stop long before you reach the point of a self disassembling rifle.

    A Chronograph is a tool in reloading, and most helpful in reloading for long range, but not the only tool, nor is it the most important tool. You can get by nicely without one. I reloaded for more than 20 years, before I got my first chronograph. But I've used one for the last 18 years or so, and would feel a bit uncomfortable now reloading without one.

    Having another tool in your tool box is never a bad thing.

    Have fun,

    Bob
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Thanks again for your time, Bob.

    I fully understood the first part...
    Realizing that muzzle velocity lost in the first couple of hundred yards is irrelevant was my main point. I do understand that as distance increases, velocity declines (at some point exponentially, according to bullet/load I guess) and mother gravity and bullet instability play a much larger role.

    Your statement that the brass will tell me what I need to know, cuts right to the point. I was wondering if a chrono was a tool that could also be used to indicate when you getting near the "edge", by correlating velocity- to pressure. I understand there's too many variables for that to be the case.

    I hand my two sons their boxes of ammo before we get to the range. My 18 year old has been schooled in what to look for as far as pressure signs, and always checks the first half dozen or so out of each box (of a different load) before proceeding.
    I do the same with my 13 year old, teaching him what to look for (with me doing the looking with him, of course). We review pictures online of shells exhibiting pressure signs.

    Fortunately for forums like this, those of us still learning have a place to go for "real world" expertise and knowledge, instead of having to rely solely on manufacturer's data, which may be <span style="font-style: italic">slightly</span> skewed to cover their azzes....

    Again, your time in responding is greatly appreciated.
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Wannashootit</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

    .... I was wondering if a chrono was a tool that could also be used to indicate when you getting near the "edge", by correlating velocity- to pressure. I understand there's too many variables for that to be the case.
    </div></div>

    Oddly enough I find the Chronograph more useful in telling me when pressures are too low, rather than too high or near the edge.....

    For example, I once owned a factory Sako A3 in 9.3x62 Mauser. The only 9.3 bullets I found available at the time were Speer 270 grainers. Well I also had a Speer manual, and the MAX Load recommended was 60 grain WW-760 @ 2556 FPS and CCI 250 Primer.

    Now Speers test rifle was a custom Rem 700 with custom barrel. And they used reformed 30-06 WW Brass.

    I was using a European Chambered and barreled rifle and Norma formed and headstamped 9.3x62 Brass, and a CCI 250 Primer.

    I carefully worked up to 60 grains, and my Chrono showed a whole 2339 FPS avg, and no high pressure signs, WTF?

    To make a long story short, my final safe MAX load was 70 grains WW 760 for 2543 FPS. Reading the brass, and having a Chrono allowed me to load up to 10 grains OVER book MAX. That was a big boost in performance.

    Without a chronograph, I maybe would have stopped @ 60 grains and called it good. With a Chronograph I realized something was wrong, and I carefully continued to work up the load.

    Without a chronograph I would be just flying blind and It's better to know than not......

    Bob







     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Any suggestions for a chrono?
    I see many different models, but often can't determine a difference between them other than a few more $$...

    I also notice some have printers or output for a printer. Is that useful?
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    I have two. An old PACT Model I my first chrony and a newer PACT Model II, neither are currently made.

    The current PACT Model 1 XP looks fine and does what you need, without any frills.

    Linkee:

    PACT


    But I've never owned any other brand. Always wanted a Oehler 35P though....
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    It is hard to argue with Bobs' logic in this aspect. That being said to gain true knowledge of the success (and accuracy) of your reloading skills a chronograph rapidly becomes essential equipment.

    Early on in my reloading education I developed a 30-06 hunting load with 180 gr boolets that was just amazingly accurate. I had enough brass that I never paid much attention to pressure or signs of over pressure, hey the primer was still round right? Many years later after running out of my favorite load (I had bunkered 200 rounds)I decided to make some more and at that time had a chrono. Much to my shock and dismay I had 3 consecutive CHS's but more shocking was the 3150fps velocity. Needless to say I thanked my lucky stars for a good action, stupid luck and searched a weeeeee bit lower in the speed range. My best guess was a pressure of somewhere in the 75,000+ range. I'm sure someone with Quickload could work it backwards with Win-760 but it would yield little other than the extent of my foolishness and an embarrassingly dangerous load to be labeled "DON'T EVER TRY THIS".

    As you have discovered the published word is far from consistent may lead you astray. In the absence of a chrono load low and for the best accuracy you can accomplish at the greatest distance you can go. After that, have a ball
    laugh.gif


    Cheers,

    Doc

    Edit to Add: CED2 Millennium rocks!
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    OK, chronographs are off my original topic, but hey, it's my thread so what the hell.

    I spent a couple of hours reading about them...
    Seems that volumes of data are available from the more advanced units, most of which are not of practical use for most of us non-competitive shooters.

    So, if I get a chrono, what do I want it to do for me? Thinking out loud here...visualize smoke pouring from the holes in the sides of my head...

    If we ignore all the crap besides muzzle velocity, of what practical use is that information...

    Can muzzle velocity be used to extrapolate velocity at some random distance downrange, with a high degree of accuracy?

    As a practical application... say I have determined that best accuracy with bullet "x", at a given distance is based on a certain muzzle velocity. If I choose to try a different powder, then I would load to achieve that same velocity- and theoretically, identical accuracy?

    I'm just trying to understand the <span style="font-style: italic">practical</span> uses of the instrument.

    Say someone posts their "pet load" for bullet "X" is 42 grains of Varget for a muzzle velocity of 2700 fps. If I have a similar (or identical) weapon, would the idea be to get that 2700 fps to try to replicate that load's accuracy?

     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    Well in it's most basic terms it is a tool to measure muzzle velocity from each shot fired. Armed with that data a great many things can be ascertained from your rifle, loads, and loading skills. All of which when combined can aid you in determining if the rifle isn't shooting or if the loose nut behind the trigger is the issue. Conversly it will also aid you in determining the most effective powder / boolet / speed combination for your stick.

    For instance I played with RE-17 in my 30-06 driving 210's. I already had a great RE-22 load but the promise of a new and improved better mouse trap was too good to pass up. The end result is that while I could safely get another 100fps out of the cartridge w/ good accuracy but because the case wasn't full my ES's (extreme spreads) were too large to be useful at long range.

    I find ES's to be the most useful bit of info that a chrono can give you, right after the part that shows you the velocity differences at different temperatures.

    Armed with a good solid bit of velocity data you can bounce your actual results against computer generated data to enable you to make a solid dope card as far back as you want to go w/o actually having to shoot it.

    The short version is that if you wish to have any modicum of precision in your rifle and shooting skills the chrono ranks right up there with your reloading gear and shooting technique but only slightly after verifying what your scope does. One tool will not do it all it is a total package and the more refined the package becomes the better the end result.

    Cheers,

    Doc
     
    Re: Which manual is correct- Hodgdon, or Sierra?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: doc76251</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

    The short version is that if you wish to have any modicum of precision in your rifle and shooting skills the chrono ranks right up there with your reloading gear and shooting technique but only slightly after verifying what your scope does. One tool will not do it all it is a total package and the more refined the package becomes the better the end result.

    Cheers,

    Doc </div></div>

    Makes sense.
    Thanks to all...