I would really like to get BM11's thoughts on this issue.
I think a lot of the guys in this thread are over thinking things. I am certainly no military contract expert, but I imaging MOST of the reason the military is still using bolt guns in .308 and not completely converted over to semi auto has a LOT more to do with MONEY and a lot less to do with the differences in the platform.
It is certainly true that a bolt gun is much easier to be much more accurate than a semi auto. That said, the m110 meets the .mil requirements for accuracy, and in real world engagements at real world distances, the difference between a .5 moa bolt gun and a 1 moa gas gun is all on paper, very little difference in hit percentage.
A lot of the bolt guns are being switched out to 300WM and even .338LM, which gives a distinct ballistics advantage, and those calibers really (at least for now) are MUCH more at home on a bolt gun than a gas gun, as far as I know the military hasn't even looked at a semi auto .338 or .300.
But going back to my original point, I think very little has to do with the end users preference and has very much to do with the fact that switching out a bunch of rifles that work (bolt guns) for a bunch of rifles that fill certain roles better (gas guns) is a matter of not being as big of a financial priority as certain other aspects.
And to be clear, I am a bolt gun guy that enjoys shooting gassers. My bolt gun DESTROYS my SR-25 in terms of consistent accuracy. But if I was in a situation where I needed to hit you from 600 yards away, either would get it done fine, and in that situation I'd probably be using the gun that was issued to me and not the one I chose, because I probably wouldn't have been asked the question.