Oh, it's a statistical simulation. Unless you actually get humans sick, you'll not be satisfied... yeah. ok. What about the one that shows effective filtration of aerosolized COVID? Still you remain incredulous that masks do nothing.
That's your rebuttal. Really? So, some people are forced to wear their masks all day is a reason that I shouldn't wear mine ever? Makes total sense. I'm arguing with Einstein, here.
Now, look, you can sit here an nitpick all you like. Now, I haven't claimed a damn thing except that I wear one because I think it's prudent and it's my right to do so.
You've had us posting shit for you, now you can return the favor. I dare you to do the same. Post just one article that proves the inefficacy of all masks in the reduction of the transmission of COVID-19. If there's just a small probability that it reduces the risk of transmission, you lose. Prove to me that masks unequivocally do not help, and I'll concede. Note: "Not enough evidence to conclude" or "Non-statistically significant" outcomes fail to prove anything.
I don't need a mountain of RCTs. I don't want 2 or more studies. I only request a single one that demonstrates with significant statistical evidence that COVID-19 transmission occurs to mask wearers at the same rate or more than it does to non-wearers. Short of that, you have no case and a baseless opinion. Whereas, the studies we've provided show that there is reason to believe that masks MIGHT reduce the likelihood of COVID transmission, and that's all I need for the wear of a mask to be a prudent decision, in my opinion.
