Re: Why the hate for Leupold?
Why the hate for Leupold??
I don't know about everybody else but for me I cannot say I hate Leupold, but I am very disappointed in them.
I don't know how long you have been shooting, but I have been buying my own scopes and rifles since 1972.
In the early 1980's Leupold introduced the Ultra line, for the US Military. These were the first tactical scopes, as we know them today. By around 1990-1, the line that developed into the Mark IV's, was set.
So basically for the last 20 years, there has been zero improvements to that scope line. Yes, we got M2 turrets, and better glass, illumination, and the TMR reticle, from Leupold in the interim.
But no real design changes. In the meantime companies, like S&B, USO, Premier, IOR, Vortex, SWFA, Nightforce, aomong others, have released entire lines of scopes, featuring MIL/MIL and/or MOA/MOA adjustments, coupled with FFP technology.
To make it worse, Leupold in 2002-03 released an entire line of 30mm scopes, and 1cm @ 100 M adjustments (BTW which is the same a 0.1 MILS @ 100 Yds). This line was called the European-30 Line.
So on one hand, Leupold decided to provide a metric cam, to appeal to European market, and refused to use those same cams and technology, in their Tactical line of scopes; all the while losing market share to other companies.
All the while, there prices have gone up, and the product they were delivering, has gone down. Perhaps the Tactical market was not big enough for them to play in, and support?
Ok, if they thought the tactical market was too small to support, then why as shooters should we support them? It is hard to reconcile and support corporate stupidity that profound.
Now it is 2010, and Leupold is releasing new Mk4 scopes with their true metric M5 turrets, and FFP. Good for them.
Except for this shooter it is 5-10 years too late. I moved on to companies that support; with research, new products and innovation, of what I want to shoot. And Leupold is not among them.
Bob