Filter

Noveske DDF Barrels

So I'll admit, I'm not very tactical. I just kill pigs and coyotes, usually with a 12.5" or 20" Grendel, Noveske builds, Noveske barrels.

I struggle to understand what is gained from "heating them up" with 40 rounds and checking accuracy at that point. It is a free country and if you want to do 5 mag dumps and check accuracy - hell, I'm academically curious at that point myself - but... why?

As I say every chance I get, I have 3 Noveske Grendels and on most days with factory Hornady ammo, I can reliably generate .6 MOA 5 shot groups. I've struggled to put 10 in 1", but I got tired of spending $25 at a whack on what is ultimately vanity. And, perhaps I should simply slow down, but what I'm really getting at is this -

I think of these guns as precision rifles. They're capable of real world hitting a 3-4" target at 300-400 yards, and we're using factory ammo. With handloads, we're likley under half a minute.

I can't imagine ever getting off 15-20 rounds fast in practice. Even with a pack of 50 pigs, they be scattered, smothered and covered by the time I got through a mag. And, if I'm shooting that many movers and my accuracy went from .6 MOA to 1.5 MOA - I'm pretty sure the pig hauling ass across the field would be a bigger problem than the groups opening up a bit. I don't see the benefit in chewing out the neck any faster.

If you're looking at this from a competition angle or you're fast roping into a terrorist compound, mea culpa - but beyond that
maxresdefault.jpg
  • Like
Reactions: J Max

March tracking error

That guy's a major fucking tool, I'd take anything he says or "Tests" with a huge grain of salt.
He claims to be an expert but I'd bet my bottom dollar he'd get his ass kicked in a PRS match by any random selection of dudes on this forum!

I bought a 4.5-28 when they first came out and I've put it through the ringer over the past 4 years.
It tracks true, verified to 1940 yards on my 300NMI, holds zero, and has really solid glass. Optically I'd put it between my 7-35 ATACR and ZCO 527, with a massive win in FOV.

The only disadvantage it has as a competition optic is the eye box isn't very forgiving, same with the parallax.
Not terrible, but definitely not as good as the 7-35 ATACR.
You really need to get behind the 5-42 Gen 2 with my reticle in it!! The 4.5-28 does have a tighter eyebox but the new 5-42x is a fantastic optic some should be coming to the wild here shortly. As for parallax I basically don’t touch it all day during a match. The glass in the 5-42 Gen 2 is also really really damn good. We’ve compared it side by side with the theta and zcos and many guys have said the march is actually better glass. I’ve had actual users of zcos and Thetas come look and actually go that’s actually better than my scope is.
  • Like
Reactions: 762 ULTRAMAGA

Possible ATF honeypot website.

Sorry, but if the option of making the beast with two backs with a hot ATF Chick is not part of the deal.... then it's not a honeypot.

It's a sting.


Just want to make sure you know that a honey trap involves the possibility banging hot sketchy chicks with major career aspirations and no morals.

Sirhr

PS. You don't want to know what a mudpot is... But Barney Frank would be able to explain.
Words...mean things. Keeping it real, Brother!

Trump is back…the “Now What” thread

Ok let's get the second string out the fucking way.
@Malum Prohibitum
Same question how did you determine it was fake?

It's an honest question not trying to disparage you. I can't find supporting material iether direction.

Been waiting for action / actual arrests. So far just, hooray for our side and flag waving.

Find / expose all you want, if nobody dies in prison for it it's a wash.

Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

Hey, if you can't make it in professional sports you might as will be a professional killer. At least you be good at sumpin yo.

Login to view embedded media

Just another Thursday night in Chiraq…

Rules: New Spicer Dana 44 front differential cover for my truck. No better time than right now, while I still have the cab off, and waiting for the motor to get back from the machine shop.

View attachment IMG_5203.jpeg

Xero C1 Pro - v3.30 update

The Labradar was a clunky system that was finicky and difficult to use that allowed itself to become outdated but even it had the option to pull up an old string and add to it.

If you're still curious as to why it would be useful it would make it much simpler to keep track of your shots. If you're switching rifles/ammo types ten times at the range you would have twenty strings to combine. If they were similar speeds you would have to keep paper notes to remember which strings were for which rifle/ammo. Having String 1: Rifle 1, String 2: Rifle 2 would be much easier in my opinion (and a lot of other people's opinions too it seems.)

And like you I also submitted feedback on their website. I didn't even get a response.
Um, you'll have to educate me on this one. I was an early adopter of the LR, and I used it until the Garmin came out, at which time I became an early adopter of it and never have used the LR since. But I never found the ability of the LR to add to add to a previously closed session? To my knowledge, you can't do that.