I just ran downstairs and looked through my nx8 and march (gen 2 with dual plane ret). And the ATACR
Id call getting behind the March a bit more forgiving than the NX8. And at their top zoom, the NX8 shadows more.
I find the NX8's reticle to be much brighter. Whether it's easier to pick up bc it's brighter or bc there is more than just a small dot illuminated, I can't say. Or I can say, and it's both.
Having the adjustable parallax is nice but I found it a bit finicky just playing with it now from close to ~200 yards.
I don't want to talk too much about glass sharpness bc atm my eyes are tired and the scopes focus might be a bit off and so comments might be me vs the scopes.
I like the color/ light transmission in both.
I love the NF reticle. The March one is cool too
Value is subjective. But Im not sure the March is worth the cost. As much as I want to really support the product.
I will also add that while I dislike the ocular tube movement when zooming the ATACR, the image is flat and forgiving and feels bigger as compared to the NX8. (im not referencing specs, just my eyes' feeling). Whether *that* is worth it... But unless size is reeeaaaly important, if you were going to spend more, the ATACR feels an easier scope than the March.
I like the NF reticle more than the Vortex (which I have but hasn't been mounted for a while).