Trump is back…the “Now What” thread
- Thread starter D̷e̷v̷i̷l̷D̷o̷c̷A̷Z̷
- Start date
Another week and I still didn’t see any arrests.
They would have Trump in prison already
They would have Trump in prison already
Trump Judge Rebuffs Catholic Bishops - Refuses to Order White House to Continue Flow of Money to Catholic Groups for Their Open Borders Work with Illegal Aliens | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
In a pivotal ruling, Judge Timothy McFadden declines to compel the Trump administration to resume funding for Catholic Charities, framing the issue as a contractual dispute better suited for a different court.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
thank god we have "alternative media" to ask the real questions.
Judge denies Pulitzer board’s effort to delay Trump defamation case
The ruling paves the way for the discovery process, where Trump’s lawyers are seeking the board’s internal deliberations in its 2018 awards to the New York Times and Washington Post for Russia collusion coverage.
justthenews.com
That Right There. I down to my last 3 cases of 545 and less than 10-k of 762
.
RFK Jr. Exposes A Truth That Could Bankrupt The Antidepressant Industry | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
When I watched the video of her as Trump was walking by this is what it looked like to me. Eyes tearing up because she was threatened/forced to do what she did. Like her whole family was threatened or something. Of course that'd never happen in this country . That kind of stuff only happens in shithole countries.maybe this is why she ditched the constitution?
I’d like to see the republicans enshrine every EO in a law the day PDJT signs the EO.
Activist justices can FO.
i gave up on import 5.45. just went with horn black about $.85/r shipped. bad but 308 GMM is about $1.25 which is an improvement of late.
Wtf does “we should be producing news ourselves” mean? She doesn’t mean we the Government right?
Are American voters naive enough to believe this nonsense?
"When the President balances the budget . . ." LOL. Come on.
First, the "President" does not have anything to do with the budget. Even if you believe the made up dollar figures coming out of DOGE that are not showing up in daily, publicly available spending reports, assume that they were showing up as actual savings, there is no way for "the President" to balance the budget.
2024 budget is approx. $6,750,000,000,000
revenue was only $4,920,000,000,000
2024 deficit is $1,830,000,000,000
CBO projects $1,900,000,000,000 deficit for 2025, which is higher than 2024.
So to balance the budget, DOGE needs to eliminate almost $2 Trillion worth of spending, in a fiscal year that is already a third over.
Does anybody believe this horseshit?
There are also potential dangers in getting rid of the income tax for 91% of American households. All of a sudden voters do not care about increasing income tax rates. Hey, it does not affect me. Shrug. Apathy, because it is somebody else. We already have that danger approaching because almost half do not pay income taxes.
Anyway, that last part is academic, because this President balancing the budget thing is laughable. What silly propaganda.
I would say Trump must think we are all stupid, but I am worried that maybe his thinking is correct.
Additionally, let's pretend the President magically balances the budget.
Then he gets Congress to eliminate income taxes on all but the top decile of incomes.
So 90% of us pay no income taxes.
Guess what? 90% of us pay 30% of the income taxes.
That top decile pays only 70% of the income taxes.
So now income tax collections are down by 30%. All of a sudden, the budget is not so balanced anymore. No problem, though, I am sure DOGE can find some more savings to make up the difference.
Then he gets Congress to eliminate income taxes on all but the top decile of incomes.
So 90% of us pay no income taxes.
Guess what? 90% of us pay 30% of the income taxes.
That top decile pays only 70% of the income taxes.
So now income tax collections are down by 30%. All of a sudden, the budget is not so balanced anymore. No problem, though, I am sure DOGE can find some more savings to make up the difference.
Last edited:
Were any of you shocked to find that the top 10% pay 70% of the income taxes?
They make only 49% of the income.
Not fair.
But it gets worse. The top 5% make 38% of the income but pay 61% of the income taxes. What do you think about a system like that? They make a little more than a third of the income but pay almost two thirds of the income taxes?
The top 1% (remember the Occupy Wall Street protests?) make 22% of the income.
The top 1% pay 40% of all of the income taxes. Is that their "fair share?"
They make only 49% of the income.
Not fair.
But it gets worse. The top 5% make 38% of the income but pay 61% of the income taxes. What do you think about a system like that? They make a little more than a third of the income but pay almost two thirds of the income taxes?
The top 1% (remember the Occupy Wall Street protests?) make 22% of the income.
The top 1% pay 40% of all of the income taxes. Is that their "fair share?"
Depends on who you ask.
All politicians are full of shit. Some just say the shit you like to hear.
Is this news to you?
pretty sure more than 40% pay no net federal income taxes, which is why so many don't give a fuck when trump cuts taxes.
they might care about gas prices.
Agreed. That is what I said in post 1978:
"All of a sudden voters do not care about increasing income tax rates. Hey, it does not affect me. Shrug. Apathy, because it is somebody else. We already have that danger approaching because almost half do not pay income taxes."
Relieving 90% of Americans from paying income taxes only makes that danger worse, because very few voters will care about the income tax rate. "Raise it up, what do I care?" Most Americans do not think about economic consequences of high tax rates. The only care about whether they are going to have to pay it, which is why politicians always promise to raise taxes only above $XXXX in income per year.
i'm old enough to remember when mattel moved most of the manufacturing from california to china, starting with barbie dolls i think.
pretty sure they are also ramping down or closing shop in china.
so why haven't impeachment proceeding started already? don't we control the house?
There is a 1970s Supreme Court case to overcome . . .
"Griggs v. Duke Power Co." (1971):
This landmark case established that even if a job requirement or test doesn't appear discriminatory on its face, it can still be unlawful if it disproportionately excludes members of a protected group and is not demonstrably related to job performance
I couldn't watch more than a few seconds of the cunt. She reminds me of the cunt judge in my divorce. She's bitter cause she's ugly.
A done nothing shitshow the bitch has became. Too bad she cant act like it against the traitors.
pretty well known that the top 10 pays 70%,bottom 40 nothing,mid 50 30 %. just me but i think a straight flat tax -pick a # with no deductions would be the way. that would put a lot of CPAs out of biz but they could find something else to do for $300/hr. there would be an affect on the housing market and an affect on the rest of the economy. think they would all pan out with some time. big savings in costs of compliance with the tax code,which NOBODY understands. wouldn't need 87K armed IRS agents,maybe AI could do it. fraud would be much harder to pull. something would have to be done re capital gains. IMHO should be treated as income. would affect the stock market as MAYBE top execs would try to make stock holders some $ instead of pumping up stock values and getting $ thru that.
not gonna happen,too much entrenched power,corruption and bureaucracy involved.
not gonna happen,too much entrenched power,corruption and bureaucracy involved.
Agreed but for different reasons.
I don't think Trump's tariffs will generate enough to make up the difference between our current budget deficit and a hypothetical surplus (it's 2tril dollars after all).
Individuals who make 50k or less dollars represent about 2-3% of total tax revenue so if they're going to balance the budget without severe cuts to everything they'll have to raise taxes on higher income earners (people under 50k don't make enough/can't pay enough even if their rates were doubled). Rich people run the media, they run the political parties and they've done a pretty good job at engineering a system to make themselves richer and richer. So I don't see them backing a change to the tax law that hits them while letting the peasants off.
Grassley, Johnson, drop records revealing FBI obtained cellphones of Trump, Pence
The revelation was unveiled in legally protected whistleblower disclosures from Grassley and Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chairman Ron Johnson, and was part of the FBI's Arctic Frost investigation.
justthenews.com
HUGE WIN: Appeals Court Lifts Injunction on 2 of President Trump's Executive Orders Aimed at Eliminating DEI | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
A federal appeals court's recent decision to lift the block on President Trump's executive orders marks a significant shift in the ongoing debate over DEI policies, reshaping the political landscape ahead.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Similar threads
