pouring lighter fluid on ur balls will get rid of the crabs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeHow do you know that is a stupid statement? Did you try it? I’ve heard it really works as long as you are smoking a cigarette at the same time.pouring lighter fluid on ur balls will get rid of the crabs
That is more ignorant than stupid. That is how I was taught, took some time and effort reading forums and watching videos before I figured it out.“I use MOA because that’s what I’ve always used and I think in inches.”
That is more ignorant than stupid. That is how I was taught, took some time and effort reading forums and watching videos before I figured it out.
Fair enough.When you try to explain otherwise and they get upset, I consider it stupidity.
It's definitely more than marketing wank. Air rifles, while producing "unique vibrations", it's the double recoil in both directions that wreck traditional scopes. Typically it's the reticle that fails, as they are braced for rearward (traditional?) recoil impulse. The coil spring in an airgun has an impulse both fore and aft when fired, in very rapid succession.
With that said, I have run Leupold's on my Feinwerkbau 300's for ever. Not one issue.. It IS "recoilless", but never the less I have had zero issues running quality gear.
Not to mention someone went on and made whole pseudoscientical theory around it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_KO_FactorThe phrase knock down power
What's really funny is Taylor was all about BIG guns and "Karamojo" Bell used a 7x57 to kill thousands more elephants than "Pondoro" everNot to mention someone went on and made whole pseudoscientical theory around it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_KO_Factor
Not to mention someone went on and made whole pseudoscientical theory around it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_KO_Factor
View attachment 7232784 It’s over on the long range hunting forum.
This is pretty high up on the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
This is pretty high up on the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
that's gotta be the most precision of precision rifles i've ever seen
The guy is like 20...and still thinks tank tops are in style. Added: Has this guy won anything? I mean Erik Cortina has, why not this guy?The best part is in the comments when he’s telling Erik Cortina he doesn’t know what he’s doing.
The guy is like 20...and still thinks tank tops are in style. Added: Has this guy won anything? I mean Erik Cortina has, why not this guy?![]()
![]()
This is pretty high up on the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
it is amazing how many times the head shot inquiry get reused and bastardized, yet no one actually read the report and its findings.
i can assure you it was not from AGOGs and GripPods.
This is pretty high up on the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
Love the Barska scope
Instant cred
This is pretty high up on the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
He used the wrong version of their/there/they're as well as your/you're virtually every time .and he wants me to listen to him talk about anything with authority.
Ha ha ... not in the wind!From a guy in Dumas, TX Walmart a few years back:
"I got a buddy killing coyotes with one shot of 17 HMR at 500 yards. He only takes head shots."
I have run Leupolds on all of my spring air guns with great success so far. Over 30 years now.
Lol. You win.I have a Gamo thats not too hard on scopes.
I have a Powerline that bent a mount in half, while gouging the scope body with ring for 3/4" in 3 shots.
I dare anyone to put their ATACR on it. ???
This is pretty high up on the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
Right where it belongs.Well... Luckily I was taking a massive dump while watching it and all of the knowledge just passed right through me. Whew!
@checkmate101 There's a lot of good advice regarding using your reticle to adjust from shot to shot. But you asked about converting between mils and moa. You sound like a normal person, so just keep it real for your normal range environment. Yes, you need to know how to convert both to linear. You may not use it a lot, but know the calcs. You wouldn't pass the simple qualifying test at the longer ranges at our club if you can't. And unless you are a shooting to a high level or you're shooting varied distances, use 1"@100yd for an moa, and 3.6" @ 100yd per mil, just like you see in damn near every thread on the web, and yes even here on SH. I'm sorry, but our qualifying officers would consider you high strung if you started punching 1.047" into your calculator when they quiz you on linear movements under 10moa. And they are good shooters. The only time that extra .047" matters is adjusting out large deviations between POI and POA, like when shooting a different distance than your sight in, or if you are shooting to a high level. Once sighted at your shooting distance and you had to know the linear for smallish adjustments, then use the above calcs. Oh, and this thread is full of miscaculations, just FYI. Keep it real.
And, just in case you haven't absorbed all the chatter about about mil being 1/1000th, etc. They're referring to milliradian, but no ones offered up that it's derived from the arc length formula. Look THAT up and hopefully that will help you understand the exact connection between mils, moa, and linear. Man, forget all the banter and just go right to the source.![]()
Hi,
Well I must now go to the grocery store and purchase an issue of every tabloid magazine they have at the checkout register just so I can put back the 10 IQ points I just lost......
Sincerely,
Theis
Absolutely trueUh, he said it! So that, and anything the VA says. I'll add that.