And if so, what are they saying? There is so much propaganda pushed out there that it would be nice to hear from folks who are getting a different story from their doc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The hospital where my wife works isn't requiring employees to get them. Too much is still unknown about the vaccine.
NopeIt changes my DNA with RNA.
Which ones?Why are their countries that are banning the vaccines? Seems odd that we are not being told about these instances
South Africa is not using the AstraZeneca one, due to how ineffective it's proven to be against the new variants.Which ones?
My wife works in a hospital, and they can't even give them away to the staff. Something like ~60% of the healthcare workers are not taking it.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer, but taking this vaccine doesn't seem to make sense for most people. The virus itself is very benign, and requires pre-existing conditions and co-morbidities to exploit in order to be deadly. The median age of death worldwide from COVID-19 is around ~80-82. The average mortality in the US is older then the average life expectancy, and has 2.9 co-morbidities.
mRNA is commercially brand new. Never been deployed before. We have ZERO data on potential medium to long term health effects. CDC's VAERS is showing high rates of adverse effects, as did the clinical trials. Younger people seem to suffer more from adverse effects then older people, but also are at a lot lower risk of COVID-19. I've also heard some interesting (and scary things) about high frequency of blood clotting markers being exhibited in young people (below 40) that get the vaccine.
If you are not in an at-risk group, it doesn't make sense to get it. Not with the potential unknowns and adverse side effects.
A long time neighbor is an MD, genetic researcher and part of the Genome project. He is globally recognized for his work in developing genetically modified viruses for treatment of common cancers. He knows and has worked with the people at BioNtech (sp?). My wife works in the medical field so we talked to him about the vaccine as she had some concerns. He understands the science as well as anyone and alleviated her concerns. He can be a bit of bit of a prick at times but I trust him on the science and he gives it a thumbs up FWIW.
Personally I'm not worried about not being vaccinated and we're taking a wait and see approach as there is still a ton of research underway and we are seeing more variants that need to be considered as new vaccines are developed. Early on we knew some people in pretty serious condition from the virus and a few friends and acquaintances that died from it but most people that have had it more recently have recovered in a couple of weeks or had limited symptoms.
182% not likely to get it here. Wife is 163% and she works for a county health department.A survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation found 29% of the healthcare workers questioned likely would not get the vaccine:
View attachment 7560636
It is really cool technology! He's in human trials with a lot of early success but there are some side effects - nothing too bad though. I hope he succeeds as it would be good to have a highly effective cure for some common cancers in our lifetime. Basically the modified virus makes the cancer "visible" to the body's immune system and it destroys the cancer from the outside in rather than other methods that get the main tumor or growth and it pops up again elsewhere in the body.The technology is allegedly really cool. In theory/principal, it's supposed to be a pretty big breakthrough in scientific technology.
What is not known is how the human body reacts to this technology. Testing has been very limited in scope of people enrolled (mostly younger and healthy people, no pregnant people, no highly allergenic groups, etc), along with very limited time. At this point, our knowledge is mostly from a theoretical standpoint.
No matter how good and how smart we as a species think we are, there is still a lot we don't know. The human body is an extremely complex machine, and there are many aspects that are still out of our grasp of understanding. We still get a lot of things wrong, especially when it comes to medicine and the human body. From a personal/individual standpoint, I believe it's safer to sit this giant clinical phase 3/4 experiment out. Especially when this virus represents statistically no threat to me. If this was a highly transmissive and airborne strain of ebola, that would be something else. But I'm not willing to be a test subject for a brand new type of technology, not when the risks for the virus are so low.
I was under the impression RNR attaches to your DNA. Then changes or alters it? Again I'm no Dr. Just what I've read.Nope
Their needs to be something sent to Wuhan, and it sure as fuck not money!Don't worry though our taxes will still be sent to the Wuhan virol institute to study viruses so they can make another bioweapon that makes this one pail in comparison
![]()
Wuhan Lab Eligible to Receive US Taxpayer Funding Through 2024, NIH Confirms
www.theepochtimes.com
An excellent retort to the tyrants forcing mask use. As an argument against the vaccine I'm not so sure. First you would have to feel the mask offered protection. I don't believe it offers much protection.If the masks work why the vaccine, if the vaccine works why do we continue to need a mask? Trust the experts. Just like the first “new model” of anything, I’m waiting for a few tweeks before taking it.
Everyone I know, who's had covid, was faithful mask wearers.An excellent retort to the tyrants forcing mask use. As an argument against the vaccine I'm not so sure. First you would have to feel the mask offered protection. I don't believe it offers much protection.
The technology is allegedly really cool. In theory/principal, it's supposed to be a pretty big breakthrough in scientific technology.
What is not known is how the human body reacts to this technology. Testing has been very limited in scope of people enrolled (mostly younger and healthy people, no pregnant people, no highly allergenic groups, etc), along with very limited time. At this point, our knowledge is mostly from a theoretical standpoint.
No matter how good and how smart we as a species think we are, there is still a lot we don't know. The human body is an extremely complex machine, and there are many aspects that are still out of our grasp of understanding. We still get a lot of things wrong, especially when it comes to medicine and the human body. From a personal/individual standpoint, I believe it's safer to sit this giant clinical phase 3/4 experiment out. Especially when this virus represents statistically no threat to me. If this was a highly transmissive and airborne strain of ebola, that would be something else. But I'm not willing to be a test subject for a brand new type of technology, not when the risks for the virus are so low.
This right here...
Just like THIS: As cool and totally friggin' badass as exploring and colonizing nearby Earth-like terrestrial planets sounds, what if, in the next few years, a prototype full crew starship relying on two stage Orion-style fission booster and hydrogen ramjet cruising propulsion is constructed, complete with full onboard life support equipment and hibernation technology? Theoretically, on paper, the vessel is rated for "95% success in transporting it's 50 person crew to Proxima Centauri, execute 2-3 terrestrial surface landings, and then return to Earth". However, it is the ship's maiden voyage and the only tests conducted so far had been short flights to the orbit of Saturn...
Would you sign up for the crew?