Looks like people need to take their city back. The people around here will NEVER let that happen, not ever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like people need to take their city back. The people around here will NEVER let that happen, not ever.
WAPOST:
A few minutes later, she pointed to a large, vacant building down the street that she said had once housed a popular department store. It was purchased by a Yemeni immigrant and has sat empty for two years, she said.
In case Trump looks like he will win, the war will start and elections will be put off. Classic Republicans will go along, probably because of allegations of sex offences against children.
Almost like we are inviting a Gulf of Tonkin event...if iran wanted to throw the dice in a big way,that is a target rich environment. doubt they would but seems a risky deployment to my uneducated view.
yeah, intimidation has a risk, and of course the expense of deploying or moving all those ships...feeding the economyif iran wanted to throw the dice in a big way,that is a target rich environment. doubt they would but seems a risky deployment to my uneducated view.
I think if we pull up 100,000 feet and look at the overall trends and apply it where both parties are supporting the same things (while ignoring what they are saying to get votes) we have the answer to your musings.this seems strange,if you compare things,to the '68 chicago dim convention riots. back then it would seem that protests were by the left against the right. now it seems like they are by the hard left against the hard left. also,hard to get why the dim mainstream is acting in opposition to their obvious soul mates. something not seen going on? i know israel has a whole lot of input and control in our gov,both parties. just hard to see that much control making obiden/harris not do what their base is demanding.
9/11 was a symbolic attack that undermined the idea that we (Americans) are safe at “home”. The wuflu didn’t have the symbolic value even though the 3D Corona CAD images were widely circulated and masks were mandated to try and make us not feel safe around our family, friends and neighbors.if iran wanted to throw the dice in a big way,that is a target rich environment. doubt they would but seems a risky deployment to my uneducated view.
interesting take. could be right. there are ways to attack battle groups anonymously. am thinking disguised drone or suicide boats/subs maybe. the question is,how much damage would cause a pull back thru public opinion? took 2-4 yrs in VN. ME war protests went nowhere,mostly because most people bought the WMD fairy tale. i think the risk is not worth it. escalation not a good option. you think the risk is manageable,i don't. you could very well be right,me wrong.9/11 was a symbolic attack that undermined the idea that we (Americans) are safe at “home”. The wuflu didn’t have the symbolic value even though the 3D Corona CAD images were widely circulated and masks were mandated to try and make us not feel safe around our family, friends and neighbors.
No one has the military bandwidth or distribution capability to move on the U.S. military and succeed in a direct confrontation. Full stop. So all adversarial objectives have to achieve symbolic wins that undermine the psychological will to 1) support the U.S. military 2) deter service 3) cutoff financial sustainment of the U.S. military and adjacent production and R&D complex.
I don’t think anyone is sinking a CVN, but I’m sure the BRICS faction wants to. To this end, they’d have to try a distributed attack to get some payloads through the defense systems. I think the reason so much hardware has been brought to the theater is because 1) that’s what the hardware exists for 2) deep layers of defense stacked 3) immediate counter battery on any originating sources that light up. So f-15 probably running missile intercepts, supplementing the naval based AEGIS assets, while the f-22 and f-35 go to work on forward targets.
The risk for the U.S. is that we don’t stack enough, allow something damaging through, and immediately destroy everything hostile with extreme prejudice. If we rise to the challenge again, it will psychologically deter a lot of future problems. There will likely be organic coups, with minimal support costs to help succeed, in the wake of a successful outcome as well.
China is still watching and wants to tune its Taiwan, Japan, SK and Philippines operation, but it would be something if they all went at the same time. They are all in bed together.
I guess it depends on your definition of WMDs and your sources. Nukes? No. Other WMDs, yes, also uranium.interesting take. could be right. there are ways to attack battle groups anonymously. am thinking disguised drone or suicide boats/subs maybe. the question is,how much damage would cause a pull back thru public opinion? took 2-4 yrs in VN. ME war protests went nowhere,mostly because most people bought the WMD fairy tale. i think the risk is not worth it. escalation not a good option. you think the risk is manageable,i don't. you could very well be right,me wrong.
my fear is some sort of tonkin gulf like deal sacrificing a carrier to inflame the public into supporting a war with iran which the deep state has wanted for long time. that could well bring in russia or china. or could let china take their shot at taiwan,so china sea. guess we will see.
i do look for some move by NWO prior to nov if they are sure trump will get in by some hook or crook.
He also claimed he killed 30 civilian looters from the roof of the Super Dome in New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Lied about punching Jesse Ventura (his estate lost the civil suit against Ventura after his death, though he had insurance through the publishing company). Exaggerated his medal count in his book, though that's minor.. He was not a source of truth.My most recent source being Chris Kyle in his book, "American Sniper." I'm not going back thru it to find the chapter, verse, & page number, but that's what he said.
I guess Rush Limbaugh was a liar too, huh?He also claimed he killed 30 civilian looters from the roof of the Super Dome in New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Lied about punching Jesse Ventura (his estate lost the civil suit against Ventura after his death, though he had insurance through the publishing company). Exaggerated his medal count in his book, though that's minor.. He was not a source of truth.
Yes. Limbaugh was an entertainer. His relationship with the truth was casual at best. Both Limbaugh and Chris Kyle (at the time of making the WMD claims) were in the entertainment business and prone to exaggerate/lie if it pumped numbers up. For Kyle it was for book sales and for Limbaugh it was people tuning in to listen. They were selling a product.I guess Rush Limbaugh was a liar too, huh?
OK.Yes. Limbaugh was an entertainer. His relationship with the truth was casual at best. Both Limbaugh and Chris Kyle (at the time of making the WMD claims) were in the entertainment business and prone to exaggerate/lie if it pumped numbers up. For Kyle it was for book sales and for Limbaugh it was people tuning in to listen. They were selling a product.
another question. who do ya'll think set this up and ordered it? not biden,harris or austin. they re all ignorant of military handling. not supposed to be,but...if any of them did,who told them to do it?
another question. who do ya'll think set this up and ordered it? not biden,harris or austin. they re all ignorant of military handling. not supposed to be,but...if any of them did,who told them to do it?
another question. who do ya'll think set this up and ordered it? not biden,harris or austin. they re all ignorant of military handling. not supposed to be,but...if any of them did,who told them to do it?
I guess Rush Limbaugh was a liar too, huh?
Let's not forget Saddam Hussein himself.Rush Limbaugh understood his audience.
So of all the countries in the ME, which was closest to a bomb? Was it Iraq with its "aluminum tubes"? Or was it Syria that built a reactor that we let Israel destroy in 2007? Was it Iran with its reactor and uranium mines and enrichment program? Or was it Pakistan that actually built a fucking bomb as we were engaging in our other misadventures?
We enacted bad policy based upon some combination of faulty intelligence and downright lies. I don't care which radio talking head backed this mistake (which, for the record, was all of them - and they were joined by much of the leftist mainstream media).
On the topic of Iraq...So of all the countries in the ME, which was closest to a bomb? Was it Iraq with its "aluminum tubes"?
But hey it's not like they were hiding Osama Bin Laden next to their equivalent of West Point.Or was it Pakistan that actually built a fucking bomb as we were engaging in our other misadventures?
Out greatest ally spreading the most important democratic values.
we sent billions for "humanitarian" aid to pakistan and india, they built missiles and bombs.Rush Limbaugh understood his audience.
So of all the countries in the ME, which was closest to a bomb? Was it Iraq with its "aluminum tubes"? Or was it Syria that built a reactor that we let Israel destroy in 2007? Was it Iran with its reactor and uranium mines and enrichment program? Or was it Pakistan that actually built a fucking bomb as we were engaging in our other misadventures?
We enacted bad policy based upon some combination of faulty intelligence and downright lies. I don't care which radio talking head backed this mistake (which, for the record, was all of them - and they were joined by much of the leftist mainstream media).
pretty bad when you finally say something after weeks on vacation and the terrorists agree with you...
Bunch of weak cucks. Kick the shitstains out of Isreal and let them live in the rubble in gaza.
Hypersonic missiles & TBMs could likely sink a CVM, or render it useless for its primary role. Pretty much the driving force for the CHICOMS developing & fielding them & other A2AD items.9/11 was a symbolic attack that undermined the idea that we (Americans) are safe at “home”. The wuflu didn’t have the symbolic value even though the 3D Corona CAD images were widely circulated and masks were mandated to try and make us not feel safe around our family, friends and neighbors.
No one has the military bandwidth or distribution capability to move on the U.S. military and succeed in a direct confrontation. Full stop. So all adversarial objectives have to achieve symbolic wins that undermine the psychological will to 1) support the U.S. military 2) deter service 3) cutoff financial sustainment of the U.S. military and adjacent production and R&D complex.
I don’t think anyone is sinking a CVN, but I’m sure the BRICS faction wants to. To this end, they’d have to try a distributed attack to get some payloads through the defense systems. I think the reason so much hardware has been brought to the theater is because 1) that’s what the hardware exists for 2) deep layers of defense stacked 3) immediate counter battery on any originating sources that light up. So f-15 probably running missile intercepts, supplementing the naval based AEGIS assets, while the f-22 and f-35 go to work on forward targets.
The risk for the U.S. is that we don’t stack enough, allow something damaging through, and immediately destroy everything hostile with extreme prejudice. If we rise to the challenge again, it will psychologically deter a lot of future problems. There will likely be organic coups, with minimal support costs to help succeed, in the wake of a successful outcome as well.
China is still watching and wants to tune its Taiwan, Japan, SK and Philippines operation, but it would be something if they all went at the same time. They are all in bed together.