Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i am in for trumpSorry, I didn't watch. I already know who I'm voting for.
Does that surprise anyone? Did anyone think that they would not cheat after the last disastrous debate?They fact checked Trump several times and not once for her... She had the questions beforehand... Her answers were to automatic.
Trump didn't do that well in the debate, I'll say it. It doesn't change anything. Nobody who watched the debate was honestly watching it because they didn't know who they were voting for. The questions were designed to allow her to shine, undoubtedly she had them in advance and time to create answers, and they worked in sneaky ways to attack Trump. She looked sharper than she ever had, so they must be giving her Joe's go juice. She lied every time she opened her mouth, and the moderators never once called her on any of it, but they called out Trump for something that was absolutely true and well documented..
So, basically what we should have expected given the venue..
Accurate.Same here.
It was very disappointing that Trump was unable to argue even basic things. Gun control (she's going to take all your guns!). He could have pointed to her platform saying she will ban assault weapons, to her statements saying she will take executive action if Congress does not act within 100 days, and then to her support for Australian style confiscation that she claims now, recently, she no longer supports.
But did he?
Sigh, no.
Partial birth abortion, he was completely unable to articulate his position. Roe v. Wade, she said she wants to return it. This is an open wide door to talk about the Constitution and the importance of federal judges who rule in accordance with the Constitution and how the next four years will have judges appointed who follow the Constitution OR . . . judges who act as a partisan and make up the law, destroying the Constitution in the process.
But did he?
Sigh, no.
Frustrating and disappointing.
All of his responses were like reading inarticulate, rambling, repetitive social media posts.
Harris did poorly, too, but Trump made her look better by his absolute failure to debate.
They did help her some, but it was not as bad as one might think.I didn't watch because I already knew Trump wasn't going to get a fair, neutral debate, and that Horris would be "helped" by ABC.
yeah, i didn't watch most of it, but he could have done better.Same here.
It was very disappointing that Trump was unable to argue even basic things. Gun control (she's going to take all your guns!). He could have pointed to her platform saying she will ban assault weapons, to her statements saying she will take executive action if Congress does not act within 100 days, and then to her support for Australian style confiscation that she claims now, recently, she no longer supports.
But did he?
Sigh, no.
Partial birth abortion, he was completely unable to articulate his position. Roe v. Wade, she said she wants to return it. This is an open wide door to talk about the Constitution and the importance of federal judges who rule in accordance with the Constitution and how the next four years will have judges appointed who follow the Constitution OR . . . judges who act as a partisan and make up the law, destroying the Constitution in the process.
But did he?
Sigh, no.
Frustrating and disappointing.
All of his responses were like reading inarticulate, rambling, repetitive social media posts.
Harris did poorly, too, but Trump made her look better by his absolute failure to debate.
I'm sure she had piped in counseling. But she could wear Boze Headphones and noone on Team Trump would do anything to prevent it. You can forget using scramblers. Biden wore earbuds in all their debates.Hmmmm---.
View attachment 8499391
She didn't need an earpiece when her best friend of 30+ years is the CEO of Disney (who owns ABC Group) and gave her the questions in advance. Cheating happened, but it wasn't a fake earring hiding as an earpiece.Hmmmm---.
View attachment 8499391
It’s almost like there is a lot more show than substance from the “conservative” side too. Politicians debating feels like I’m watching pro wrestling.I'm sure she had piped in counseling. But she could wear Boze Headphones and noone on Team Trump would do anything to prevent it. You can forget using scramblers. Biden wore earbuds in all their debates.
I love the man but it's shit like that that frustrates me about Pres. Trump.
The next debate needs to be hosted by Newsmax.
I watched about 30 seconds before I hit my quota of the nasal queen.was who last night ?
Same here.
It was very disappointing that Trump was unable to argue even basic things. Gun control (she's going to take all your guns!). He could have pointed to her platform saying she will ban assault weapons, to her statements saying she will take executive action if Congress does not act within 100 days, and then to her support for Australian style confiscation that she claims now, recently, she no longer supports.
But did he?
Sigh, no.
Partial birth abortion, he was completely unable to articulate his position. Roe v. Wade, she said she wants to return it. This is an open wide door to talk about the Constitution and the importance of federal judges who rule in accordance with the Constitution and how the next four years will have judges appointed who follow the Constitution OR . . . judges who act as a partisan and make up the law, destroying the Constitution in the process.
But did he?
Sigh, no.
Frustrating and disappointing.
All of his responses were like reading inarticulate, rambling, repetitive social media posts.
Harris did poorly, too, but Trump made her look better by his absolute failure to debate.
We're not saying Trump didn't do well- we're saying he agreed to what we all knew would be a rigged, "no-win scenario" debate. And that's what happened. She didn't need to win, the Dem media complex just needed to make her look a little better than Biden looked a few months ago, and they pulled it off. It was a very low bar she had to clear, and they made sure she did, that cum sucking road whore.I missed the beginning, so maybe I missed something. But I have to say, I don't agree with all this analysis saying Trump didn't do well. I actually thought he did a great job, especially considering how biased the moderators were.
The lies she was allowed to tell were disgusting. The coup-de-gras was when she accused Trump of using race to divide the country. Give me a fricken break, the Democrats OWN the practice of dividing people into groups.
There is no question who was telling the truth on that stage, Trump had the truth on his side on every question. Every one of the supposed "fact check" hit jobs that ABC unleashed on Trump were false. Even when David Muir interjected that there were no states in America where killing a baby was allowed after birth, I was screaming at the TV because that isn't what Trump said! He said the governors of those states were FOR those policies, highlighting how extreme the Democrats are on abortion. Is only not legal in any state because Republicans have prevented it.
I thought his answer about Ukraine was great when he pointed out she was there to negotiate, and 3 days later Putin invaded. I would have gone even further. Her plodding around Europe saying Ukraine will be a NATO country directly contributed to Putin deciding to start that war.
His best moment was his closing statement. He absolutely crushed her with his closing statement. I would have liked to see him hit her harder during the debate on being a sitting vice president, what is she waiting for?
Despite the shit talking coming from the Horiss campaign, I doubt they will really do that. Like @kenny1773 said, they achieved their objective.The next debate needs to be hosted by Newsmax.
Well their tactic carried over from the Biden years has always been to throw a wall of baseless lies at Trump, accusing him of what they are and Trump has to use his two minutes to defend himself from those lies otherwise the lies stick.I thought he got out of it OK all things considered. Saying he fucked up the abortion question is bullshit since the moderators “fact checked” him when he was in fact correct.
They let Harris say all sorts of talking points while cutting Trump off. The part where she said trump would weaponize the DOJ was ironic since they are doing it to him right now. And then he starts responding & the moderators tell him “we have other things to talk about”.
I expected it to be biased but holy fuck.
It appears to me that that all the liberal media claims Harris won, and the conservative media (Newsmax, etc.) claim Trump won... as expected, really. Although Rick Santorum (on Newsmax) appeared to be at odds with several of the Newsmax pundits like Rob Schmidt... Santorum giving the edge to Harris as far as the debate goes. He got hammered by the other Newsmax folks during the "post game" show.
Although, it is interesting that Harris wants a 2nd debate. Why did she ask for that, if her side is claiming she won this one? And if they do agree to a 2nd debate, will they approve Newsmax as the moderators? I think not. I think everyone agreed that the mods really screwed over Trump fact checking him all over and not Harris one bit. Maybe that might work to Trump's advantage if he uses that during the "negotiations" for a 2nd debate.
We'll see. Honestly, I think the election is going to come down to how bad the dems can cheat by stuffing the ballot boxes, etc. etc. in the swing states.
I disagree, I didn't think he was riled at all. I think if he had been "calmer" it could have come off as tired, or older, or less energetic than Kamala. Objectively, I think he struck the perfect balance on his energy level, especially when they are tossing lie after lie in his face.I'll say it: Trump needs to calm down and get professional. What I saw last night was not. She was throwing insults that were designed to get him riled up and it worked. He has to be more mature than that. He failed to mention things he should have. If you noticed, it wasn't just that she put out Biden's policy, it was also that she was trying to bring Obama's "hope and change" back. He should have called her on that Marxist quote about being unburdened by the past so we can look forward as well.
He did well against three people for not being prepared, I will grant that. He should have prepped harder and he should have known that the gang would be against him; they always are. At the same time, the lies she told are great campaign ad fodder.
It has to be remembered that the short-term memory types remember their emotions, but quickly forget facts. Those are the ones Trump needed to convince. I don't think he did that. If I was part of his debate prep team I would have killed a bottle of Tequila afterward in my hotel room alone.
Trump was constantly on the defensive instead of being on the offensive but it was set up that way.Same here.
Partial birth abortion, he was completely unable to articulate his position. Roe v. Wade, she said she wants to return it. This is an open wide door to talk about the Constitution and the importance of federal judges who rule in accordance with the Constitution and how the next four years will have judges appointed who follow the Constitution OR . . . judges who act as a partisan and make up the law, destroying the Constitution in the process.
But did he?
Sigh, no.
Frustrating and disappointing.
All of his responses were like reading inarticulate, rambling, repetitive social media posts.
Harris did poorly, too, but Trump made her look better by his absolute failure to debate.
But, don't let that fool you.She didn't need an earpiece when her best friend of 30+ years is the CEO of Disney (who owns ABC Group) and gave her the questions in advance. Cheating happened, but it wasn't a fake earring hiding as an earpiece.
The only reason anyone is saying Trump made her look better, is simple. She flipped on almost every single policy she believes in, and she lied almost every single time she spoke. Trump HAD to counter with the truth, there's no debating a lie without countering with the truth. That's all he could do, especially to inform those on the fence, that what she was saying was not true.Harris did poorly, too, but Trump made her look better by his absolute failure to debate.
Your last sentence is exactly what Trump should have said in the debate. Did he say it?If Trump was going to destroy America, he would have done it his first term. If Harris was going to help America, she would have done it her first term.
Can you give an example? I just didnt see that.Trump absolutely faceplanted , vain fuck fell for every trap Kamala laid out like a 3year old.
Looked like Trump did not prepare much for the debate as he was crashing and burning on realy simple shit. Tulsi would have smoked Kamala raw given same setup. He is really vain as fuck .
Like Rogan said Trump loosing is very real posibility.
Your last sentence is exactly what Trump should have said in the debate. Did he say it?