Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really enjoy football. But, I’m too old for college and the pros. It’s really unfair that they don’t have a division for older and slower guys like me. Ima write Roger right now.Oh no I don’t miss the point I am trying to use my knowledge of 37 years of watching IHMSA die as a sport to help save Prs from doing the same. I am going to be 69 in March I don’t move well or shoot well enough to be a threat to anyone’s score but I do see problems were people are soon going to start walking away. I think it is a great sport that needs a little tweaking and I think lowlight see’s the same.
Yes, the "competitors have spoken". The point is there aren't that many, and no real growth. Its a niche hobby (notice I didn't say sport) and always will be.I saw the same thing in Sporting Clays. I traveled the SE competing. Shooting partner shot his best score with Remington 1100 - he HAD to have a Kreighoff. He CHOSE to spend all that money on $$ over/under. Saw the same thing in USPSA - buddy wanted to compete and Production was available - I begged him to run a Glock34 for a season - went to first match and saw the Open Race Guns - he HAD to have one. His choice.
PRS is same way - there are only a handful of competitors who choose 308, Gas Gun, etc. No one makes them - it is a fact that competitors want the cool toys.
People on Snipers Hide can wax poetic about the good old days of 308 and the match formats they prefer - but the competitors seem to have spoken.
I live in MPA 6mm country here in GA and I run a Foundation in 25x47.
And your point?In some ways I disagree. Shooting solid pieces of guilding metal covered lead, is shooting solid pieces of guilding metal covered lead.
Trigger control, getting on target, being steady and belling under control of yourself under pressure, are all the hallmark of all shooting sports, including hunting! Getting back on target quickly is important in PRS. It is also an important skill in Hunting, though one would hope that it is not necessary.
And, most sports are technically a game. So, I also ask, what is wrong with that? Afterall, we use specially carved pieces of a special wood to hit a ball, and not some stick that fell off of a tree. And its a sport but its called a “game.”
His point was that it is a sport as far as the term sport is used in regular context. Try to keep up, will ya?And your point?
Forgive me if I fail to see the the significance of a somewhat obvious statement.His point was that it is a sport as far as the term sport is used in regular context. Try to keep up, will ya?![]()
You Yanks are way too political about stuff.His point was that it is a sport as far as the term sport is used in regular context. Try to keep up, will ya?![]()
When I read a lot of the comments, I'm reminded of some of the back chatter at AGM's & monthly committee meetings.You Yanks are way too political about stuff.
I know there have been some light discussion about this but how does everyone feel about having standardized targets for a certain yardge.
Example: targets must be approximately these sizes for this yardage range.
400-6"-10"
550-700-8"-12"
800-1000-12"-18"
I get what your saying. I just threw out some random numbers. But you could give min/max size to use that way you have a range of sizes if you want to do like a TYL rack.Nope. More interesting with different sizes depending on stage.
Your not wrong. I just see it from the perspective of you have one group who gets pissy when they see a meatball match and they didn't shoot that match. Then another group who gets pissy when the match was too difficult due to smaller targets. In my eyes it equals the playing field across the nation and at that point the main denominator are weather and shooter skill. But I also realize same could be said for put out whatever targets you want.If you look at the sports we are talking about dying they all have standardized target sizes. Learn from that. Keep it interesting and different.
Your not wrong. I just see it from the perspective of you have one group who gets pissy when they see a meatball match and they didn't shoot that match. Then another group who gets pissy when the match was too difficult due to smaller targets. In my eyes it equals the playing field across the nation and at that point the main denominator are weather and shooter skill. But I also realize same could be said for put out whatever targets you want.
NOI know there have been some light discussion about this but how does everyone feel about having standardized targets for a certain yardge.
Example: targets must be approximately these sizes for this yardage range.
400-6"-10"
550-700-8"-12"
800-1000-12"-18"
To be clear I did not say limit it to one size. I said a range of size. A min/max for a said yardage. That way you have options in size to use.NO
NO
NO!
One of the neat things about Precision Rifle Shooting is the differences in the targets, target sizes and shapes. Nailing Match directors to one size means, it may be great for the top shooters and shitty for the lower ranks or great for the lower ranks and not worth the effort for the better shooters.
So your club is full of Yanks too?When I read a lot of the comments, I'm reminded of some of the back chatter at AGM's & monthly committee meetings.
All kinds of theories why certain things happen or don't happen. Conspiracies about committee member motivations & all manner of wild accusations, under the table plans & etc. Then, when an idea is finally brought to the meeting, it's usually agreed that we can simply try it out & see how it goes. No muss, no fuss.
Most of the time it really is that simple.
It would seem like that but, we don't tend to make life so difficult when it comes time to try something different & see what happens.So your club is full of Yanks too?![]()
Problem is, who or what sets the range. Then again, it can go either way. I can see your point, but I’ve shot matches with standard targets forever, and the really good shots walked away because it was too easy for them and the newer shooters gave up because it was too hard.To be clear I did not say limit it to one size. I said a range of size. A min/max for a said yardage. That way you have options in size to use.
To be clear I did not say limit it to one size. I said a range of size. A min/max for a said yardage. That way you have options in size to use.
How many of yall would be pissed to shoot a match where every single target was 6 tenths wide?
I spat out random numbers as an example not exacts. Idc what the target size range is in size. Just throwing out an idea and an example. I apologize I don't translate examples very clear.But even a range is wrong. 12-18” at 1000? What about all those guys bragging on their sub half moa all day rifles? Lol seriously though going below 12” at 1000 should be done. I have shot matches with 5” targets and bowling pins at that range. It’s a challenge.
I spat out random numbers as an example not exacts. Idc what the target size range is in size. Just throwing out an idea and an example. I apologize I don't translate examples very clear.
Then why be against standardized targets?Better question is why would you be? It’s a target. Shoot it.
Then why be against standardized targets?
This justification for stifling change is also stifling growth. What does "matches are still selling out" mean? It gives the impression that "who cares?" as long as the same 200 shooters continue spending there money. Maybe it's purely a regional problem, but IMO there is a lack of matches and an even larger lack of quality matches.But, also no, because matches are still selling out and shooters are voting with their wallets.
You sir, have nailed it on the head.Yes, the "competitors have spoken". The point is there aren't that many, and no real growth. It's a niche hobby (notice I didn't say sport) and always will be.
I think it could be argued that “you’re doing it wrong.”So, while playing sports is included in hobbies, the key word is relax. Nothing about Precision Rifle or any Shooting Sport can be described as relaxing.
So enlighten me since I'm probably alot younger than most of you and didn't get the experience of the OG days and the OG matches. What was the average target size back then? Say from 2007 to 2015? Another question I have is what percant did the winner typically shoot back then.
Just looking at this makes me want to go do itThat's the thing. There were no set sizes to even give an idea. Just targets. Sometimes you shot 5" at 1000 and sometimes a full sized IPSC. Position, speed and wind were the challenging factors. I remember holding 5 mils of wind on a IPSC at 1000 at Rifles Only. A challenging target. Don't get hung up on size.
There were other things also like movement and positional shooting that added to the challenge. It wasn't take bag, place on prop and place rifle on bag. Rifles Only had a full obstacle course you had to go through and take shots on targets at different locations through it. People had fun and no one worried about points. There is a reason a lot of people still like shooting "outlaw" matches.
View attachment 8517845
And fire on paper targets in a line. And pistol stages.
View attachment 8517848
Not saying this is all the best way to do things but it's also fun for shooters to challenge themselves and do it.
@Rob01 how were the paper targets scored? That is a cool concept. I guess give me an example of a paper stage.
Same here. I wish I lived closer to rifles only. I'd love to shoot the brawl match. I don't know if Jacob still implements it but I don't like the rule of mag must be out to move positions. I get the saftey aspect of it but from a practical sense I don't like. But I haven't shot the match so my opinion on it could be totally wrong. I like mag changes but not if I gotta do 5 different positions while dropping my mag.Just looking at this makes me want to go do it
Probably regional. Living in Texas, I can shoot a match every weekend. And, if PRS isn’t doing it, there is USPSA, NSCA, 3-gun, IDPA, steel challenge, various outlaw matches, etc.This justification for stifling change is also stifling growth. What does "matches are still selling out" mean? It gives the impression that "who cares?" as long as the same 200 shooters continue spending there money. Maybe it's purely a regional problem, but IMO there is a lack of matches and an even larger lack of quality matches.
You sir, have nailed it on the head.
This is how we used to do things here in our field matches. The paper targets were the part that put the precision in the match. Competitors spoke with their dollars and out loud and bitched and moaned at the tough paper targets (usually 2-3 of the first stages).That's the thing. There were no set sizes to even give an idea. Just targets. Sometimes you shot 5" at 1000 and sometimes a full sized IPSC. Position, speed and wind were the challenging factors. I remember holding 5 mils of wind on a IPSC at 1000 at Rifles Only. A challenging target. Don't get hung up on size.
There were other things also like movement and positional shooting that added to the challenge. It wasn't take bag, place on prop and place rifle on bag. Rifles Only had a full obstacle course you had to go through and take shots on targets at different locations through it. People had fun and no one worried about points. There is a reason a lot of people still like shooting "outlaw" matches.
View attachment 8517845
And fire on paper targets in a line. And pistol stages.
View attachment 8517848
Not saying this is all the best way to do things but it's also fun for shooters to challenge themselves and do it.
Shootin and playing a game that uses a firearm has training value, hunting, home defense etcThere is no “training value” to playing baseball, football, soccer, basketball, or any of the myriad VERY popular and lucrative professional sports. The games are painfully contrived (fields and courts are all pretty much the same, the goals of the game are always the same, etc).
PRS is a game. Accept it for what it is. Practice PRS to be better at PRS. Shoot PRS to have fun and score well in PRS. Don’t expect all of the skills to carry on ver to other persuits.
Being good at swinging a bat doesn’t make you good at swinging a hammer. And, that’s ok.
10th amendment…I don’t recall any games mentioned in the Constitution ? But guns are …
They may have turned it into a game with less value today than before but it was designed to operate alongside practical shooting
The stages we designed initially came from combat. We translated the actions of the men we were teaching to apply they skills they used to succeed.
The fact they turned it to barricade bench rest doesn’t take away our original intent. You were fighting with a bolt gun
Look at the stages as they were meant to be run, look at the end of the video Burkett is outta breathe.
People removing the training value from matches is part of the complaint.
I can’t tell you how many pipe hitters used to participate in order to speed them up and gain accuracy
That is another benefit- speed and accuracy
I've noticed that there are essentially 2 camps to this conversation and others like it:
1. Those that entered the sport in the days like above, when the competitions had more practical benefit and simulated skillsets from the real world outside of competitions. Members of this camp typically miss some of the more practical applications that were provided from the earlier days of the sport. Back when it was more of a "train as you fight, fight as you train" sort of mentality.
2. Those that entered the sport after it transitioned into solely being a game of barricade benchrest. This camp enjoys the game for what it is, and doesn't seem to really understand camp 1. For this camp, PRS and the like are solely just games to be played on the weekend, one in which you compete against others and try to get the highest score.
Yeah the stages in that video are probably a lot of fun. I shot PRS for a couple of years, and the 22lr variant when it was just getting going. But, I prefer Run&Gun comps. For me, PRS is golf with a gun. So is sporting clays. I enjoy golf. I enjoy PRS. I enjoy sporting clays. They are what they are.
From what I’ve seen on YouTube, 2Gun- like the “Brutality series”- looks like a lot of fun too. But, I haven’t seen anything local.