-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Maggie’s Funny & awesome pics, vids and memes thread (work safe, no nudity)
- Thread starter Lawless
- Start date
Is that Sammy Davis . . . carrying the luggage?
Did they arrest the bicyclist for false imprisonment?
Do you know the difference between a constitutional right and a state law?
I haven't found where killing babies is constitutionally protected? If you know where it's at. Could you provide a link
It's on the shelf right next to the muffler bearings and blinker fluid.
I apologize to @Lawless if this goes off the rails. But I couldn't let that idiocity pass
Reaching inside my vehicle would be detrimental to your cycling career.
Not sure if it's like this everywhere, but in PA opening the door like that is car jacking
But ... but .. why? You can't squish a cockroach in the corner with these.
Thank you,
MrSmith
Did anybody notice that on the little blurb description of the movie top-secret they referred to Val Kilmer as fighting fascists? No he was fighting East Germans and they were communists. Funny how they whitewashed that as well.
Cyclists who want to use the road should be required to register and get a tag for all their bikes.
Part 3 will be court I guess.
Last edited:
I used to write the "percent", but that got too confusing for some. 20%, got confused with $20 too many times. Not that I cared. As a single person, I usually tip really well. I can tip the same amount as my bill, and it is still cheaper than eating out with a wasteful woman!
POS fucking cop writes a ticket for something he didn't see and he took the word of someone that was involved and zero investigation.Cyclists who want to use the road should be required to register and get a tag for all their bikes.
Part 3 will be court I guess.
I'd sue the cop, his department and the city/county he works in for my time and expenses.
In TN the Castle Doctrine extends to your vehicle. Open my door while I'm occupying it is no different than entering my house uninvited.
But that’s not carjacking. Carjacking is a robbery. This was false imprisonment.
“I did not know if he wanted my car, my wallet or my life. Fearing for the safety of my family and myself I fired two rounds in the direction of the threat.”
Would not be the best choice for us, even in a conservative county in Oregon...and we do have some decent use of force/self defense laws.
Problem would be going to court & the costs associated with such. In this example.
-aside from the morality of possibly killing someone unarmed & no true threat (to us). Even a douchebag...
Sure, may be legal & may not get convicted. In many places, would not be legal & would get convicted.
Missed “Im not a threat,” on his jersey.
I wasn't suggesting that I would have shot him. I'd have probably done what this driver did and waited for the cops so he'd be their problem.
I was just saying that the cyclist was risking a bullet or two to the chest like that
I was just saying that the cyclist was risking a bullet or two to the chest like that
I think spandex touched the kid at some point, blocking his path of egress from the vehicle.
I know the TV shows call this "assault" when it happens to a alphabet agent but I'm not sure how much leeway the courts give to mere mortals in the same situation.
I think the kid handled it well. It's clear the blubbering spandex sack of shit was no real threat to anybody, causing him even more harm wouldn't help the situation. The way things played out I think the kid has the opportunity to press charges if he wants for harassment, assault and false report.
ETA: apologies @Camelfilter
For it to be a good shoot here in Texas there should be some clear threat to life or property and spandex was neither one.
It might have been OK to slap his touching hand away and respond accordingly to any follow up aggression but, also here in Texas, this could be viewed as unnecessary escalation if you're carrying.
Unarmed, spandexed 72-year-old on a bike? You’d be in prison before you finished your thought.
Here are the Utah model jury instructions regarding use of force:
I don’t see anything authorizing deadly force in our scenario.
