
U.S. Department of Justice Announces Second Amendment Pattern-or-Practice Investigation into California’s Los Angeles County
Protecting the Second Amendment rights of ordinary, law-abiding Americans is a high priority for this Administration.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This being the Pit, someone will be along in a moment to post that if the Los Angeles County sheriff is not arrested and publicly executed by hanging, on Pay per View, then this all means nothing.
She’s anti-pot you have no chanceNot at all. She's a 100%
WOULD
![]()
![]()
This was from a rogue us district attorney, and has already been rescinded while the US Attorneys office evaluates ongoing litigation. The appearance is that they are changing course on almost all previous firearm related cases. We shall see.Yet DOJ is arguing suppressors aren't covered by the 2nd ammendment?
The jury is still out on Pam Bondi.
I saw what you did there "someone"This being the Pit, someone will be along in a moment to post that if the Los Angeles County sheriff is not arrested and publicly executed by hanging, on Pay per View, then this all means nothing.
Well suppressors are not firearms so.....................
If so then what is the reasoning for regulation?Well suppressors are not firearms so.....................
If so then what is the reasoning for regulation?
These do the same thing but aren't an attachment:
View attachment 8652492
R
This being the Pit, someone will be along in a moment to post show us her boobs!
Well suppressors are not firearms so.....................
And that is the trap; the Republic along with our rights have been shot in so for so long we are now in the position that we are supposed to be happy with a mere incompetent liar - instead of someone actively trying to ass rape us out of more.For the Bondi haters, I wonder what previous AG...under any admin.... you think was a better choice?
I think his point is that they shouldn’t be. At least that’s how I read it and how I feel. I don’t think firearms should be regulated by the fed since that doesn’t stop crimes anyways. The doj doesn’t want suppressor covered by the second amendment cause then they can continue to collect a tax for every suppressor sold. Even though it’s a useless piece of pipe without a firearm to put it on.Interesting argument.
Should they be, or should they not be?
You miss the point entirely, they are “Arms” as in the right to keep and bear ARMS, not just firearms. The second amendment protects all arms both offensive and defensive. No one is trying to say they are a firearm well I guess other than the NFA, but they must be and I believe will be recognized as Arms by the courts.Well suppressors are not firearms so.....................
It's a crazy thing because you can argue it in so many ways depending on where you stand. They're arms, so they shall no be infringed! Or they're arms so they needed to be regulated. Or They're accessories so there should be no regulations, or they're accessories, not arms, so we can ban, tax or regulate them all we want!
Magazines (detachable, "high" capacity or not) are accessories, but vital to the function of arms, making them arms. Or they're accessories, clearly evident by all the arms that don't have them, so not protected.
Well suppressors are not firearms so.....................
I'll agree with MegaGator. However, there are lots of men in upper levels of government and other agencies who have never served in combat or led men in combat. Remember, there was a time in this country when only landowners could vote, women couldn't vote. Once both those changed look how country changed.Anti-2A, Fox News Barbie Bondi can kiss my ass…… unshaven.
SIMP cucks are killing this country.
View attachment 8652786
The 2A protects the right to bear “arms”. Not being a firearm should not mean it also doesn’t fall under 2A protection. Swords, cannons, knives, grenades etc are all “arms”. Yep grenades, I want them, should be allowed.So I said it as a double edged sword.
It is not a firearm so it should NOT be regulated
Because it is not a firearm they can do whatever they want with it
And as far as the tax stamp being $200 bucks still, that was equivalent to $3000 when it was implemented.
Is it an accessory ? Yes.
Is it needed to operate a firearm ? No
Should it take a year to get approval ? No and it is down to hours, days now.
Is a magazine an accessory ? Yes
Is it needed to operate a firearm ? Yes
Should be no regulations.
continue with each part.
You can buy any part and have it shipped to your front door EXCEPT the receiver or in SIG's striker fired the FCU frame.
Good argument.,I agree with you.The 2A protects the right to bear “arms”. Not being a firearm should not mean it also doesn’t fall under 2A protection. Swords, cannons, knives, grenades etc are all “arms”. Yep grenades, I want them, should be allowed.