.0004454545%

Maggot

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood"
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
  • Jul 27, 2007
    26,667
    31,323
    Virginia
    I read today that there have been 147000 deaths in the US from the Chinese Virus, Given 330000000 people that comes out to 0004454545%
    Is my math wrong or is it some thing else? I dont understand.
     
    Hope springs eternal as Doc's beginning to organize and speak up.
    Unfriendly virus to be sure but very treatable. Being played on so many levels; financial, political, etc.

     
    Might be a little more accurate to divide the number of deaths by the number of infected (which is going to be off due to erroneous reporting anyway). However, I think the numbers would be a little more accurate than simply including everyone who hasn't been infected yet.

    I'm not supporting the unnecessary chaos.
     
    I read today that there have been 147000 deaths in the US from the Chinese Virus, Given 330000000 people that comes out to 0004454545%
    Is my math wrong or is it some thing else? I dont understand.


    Sorry but your math is .... WRONG.

    You forgot to add the 20 million illegals and anchor babies

    350,000,000 divided by 147,000. = .00042 %
     
    So in a lot of places the hospitals and doctors don't want to see you for anything but the most urgent stuff as they are "saving themselves" for the Wuhan Virus.... I wonder if this means the lower number of deaths from medical malpractice will offset the deaths from Wuhan virus?

    Either way, just saying it is bound to make some minds overload.
     
    I just computed the death percentage for TN and AL reported cases (key word REPORTED). . About 1% for TN and 1.8% for AL. And for that, we're pumping out TRILLIONS of dollars and China is likely buying up our debt. Makes you wonder....are both parties selling the USA? Sure appears that way.
     
    I just computed the death percentage for TN and AL reported cases (key word REPORTED). . About 1% for TN and 1.8% for AL. And for that, we're pumping out TRILLIONS of dollars and China is likely buying up our debt. Makes you wonder....are both parties selling the USA? Sure appears that way.

    Sir, we were sold out a long time ago, it’s just that it is getting worse. You can bet your ass that our politicians are enriching themselves everytime one of these trillion dollar stimulus deals go out. Watch it will likely start increasing in number.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: W54/XM-388
    OK, Here's one that I've been pondering for a couple of days.

    The MSM (local and national) incessantly keeping harping on today's new cases and the total cases. Might I suggest a different metric that moves with their narrative.

    Let's, for a moment, consider that the daily statistics at a local level are accurate for 1) new cases positive, and 2) number of deaths. I'm not as interested with the negative cases because they are not really involved except to get a understanding of how many people have been tested.

    Now let's agree with the premise of the typical infection runs between 10 and 14 days. I've seen several different opinions, however this seems to be within the upper and lower limits I've seen.

    Now let's create a spreadsheet where we enter the number of 'New' cases reported. It's important that we are looking at 'New' POSITIVE cases. Create a formula that looks back 10 to 14 days to create a running total. For a quick analysis tool, I would put that variable in a specific cell and use absolute referencing in the formula to get that number.

    What we are building is a cumulative calculation in each column that adds the new Positive cases, but drops out all the cases that have expired based on the threshold we set in the absolute reference.

    NOW we have an indication of a very basic infection load on a daily basis. It will be something different from what the news is drumming into our heads non-stop 24/7/365.

    Once you have that, you can subtract out the number of deaths to get a sense of how many people were infected, and how many survived.

    If you are a geek like me, you would start adding in other demographics such gender (real, not imaginary), age, race, number of comorbidities, etc. At this point you would probably (statistical humor) have to move to a different tool to see and correlation. (you could do it in excel, but why make life any harder)

    Now that you have that daily infected number, do a time series to see if we are really getting worse, staying the same, or getting better.

    Imagine if you could do this on a national/regional/municipality level.

    My hypothesis is you would find a correlation to infection with 'Peaceful Protests' and 'Illegal Entry'. If I was a statistician, I would rephrase that hypothesis as a null hypothesis so I could run some tests.

    Any comments would be appreciated (or ignored like my wifey does :D )
     
    Imagine if you could do this on a national/regional/municipality level.

    The-Twilight-Zone-featured-image.jpg
     
    The Demwits are probably calling this the Trump Flu. The outcry for this is driven solely by the November elections. I've never seen a media driven disease before, but we've got one now.
     
    People don't understand - the media is portraying the number of cases skyrocketing blah blah blah. The people dying of COVID is decreasing. Therefore, the chances of dying of COVID decreases with each additional "positive test".
     
    • Like
    Reactions: clcustom1911
    It is a bit higher than the regular flu.

    While the impact of flu varies, it places a substantial burden on the health of people in the United States each year. CDC estimates that influenza has resulted in between 9 million – 45 million illnesses, between 140,000 – 810,000 hospitalizations and between 12,00061,000 deaths annually since 2010.
     
    The math is wrong in that you're dividing the number of COVID deaths by the total population, infected or not.
    You can't include those that have never been infected in the mortality percentage calculation. That's why your number is so low.
    However, I think the actual mortality rate is still pretty dang low, like 3% or something.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Maggot
    @P-Squared @earthquake

    both you guys are on the correct path to crunching numbers

    need to add in

    false positive
    false negative
    treatment used (if people are not treated with the most effective treatment or malpractice should it be considered a death) especially if the % differs from normal hospital/doctor percentages
    treatment doseage and time frame
    treatment date started
    probable contraction date
    contraction date-test date-result date- hospitalization date

    a few more data points

    oh shit...thats what the CDC does lol

    they just dumb it down for us on TV and then the media massages the data to control the narrative
     
    I'm not sure if this was posted elsewhere, but did anyone see the average (median) age of white people who died from the virus was 81 years old (according to cdc this month) but the average age of white people dying (in general) is 79.6. Hence white people who die from the virus live on average longer than their fellow uninfected man.
     
    skewed numbers when looking at age

    Cuomo in NY (moron), put sick people in old age homes

    lot of old sick people were directly exposed to covid

    remove that disaster and the age changes etc
     
    lol, ~0.04 would be valid if we knew everyone had it.
    in any case, the death count is a joke. they are listing almost everything as covid, even if they died in an accidents and even if they were never tested.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: yakstone