Re: 223 vs 22-250
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Eagle_eye</div><div class="ubbcode-body">iv been reading some ballistic charts from remington, and it seems the the .204 has better 'Flat shooting' capabilities then the .223 and more kinetic energy (knock down power.
Im starting to get excited about this caliber.
</div></div>
The .204 is a very nice caliber but you have to be careful about comparing it with the .223. By the simple expedient of using a longer/heavier bullet in the .223 I can make it do things the .204 can only dream about and at half the distance. If you are comapring the best .204 loading to a 55gr .223, that's different and shortsighted.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Eagle_eye</div><div class="ubbcode-body">iv been reading some ballistic charts from remington, and it seems the the .204 has better 'Flat shooting' capabilities then the .223 and more kinetic energy (knock down power.
Im starting to get excited about this caliber.
</div></div>
The .204 is a very nice caliber but you have to be careful about comparing it with the .223. By the simple expedient of using a longer/heavier bullet in the .223 I can make it do things the .204 can only dream about and at half the distance. If you are comapring the best .204 loading to a 55gr .223, that's different and shortsighted.