On October 23 I asked a couple of questions.
There were a few replies with regard to the first question that suggest the information to date is either incomplete or inconclusive. Apparently results sanctioned by manufacturers of both standard and fast twist barrels continue to remain unavailable.
With regard to the second question, a few replies give anecdotal or limited information in the form of a small number of targets.
The accuracy performance of standard and fast twist barrels can best be compared up to 100 yards or meters by testing in a test tunnel such as at the Lapua facilities where suitable ammo for each can be used, there is no wind, and, because the rifle/barreled action is in a fixture, the shooter is removed from the equation. Of course, while that may not be conveniently available, short of that it's still possible to make a reasonable and doable comparison.
The easiest and simplest way might be to shoot rifles with standard and fast twist barrels with suitable ammo at 100 yards under similarly calm conditions. A distance of 100 yards is one at which the vagaries of outdoor shooting can be much less than at further distances. It's possible to compare apples to apples if there is very little to no wind detected.
If enough groups are shot with each rifle to make a comparison begin to be statistically sound, it should be possible to determine if in fact one produces better results at 100 than the other. While it's possible to make reasonable comparisons at 200 yards, the opportunities for starting at 100 must be more frequent for many shooters.
For those who say that 100 yards is irrelevant to the purpose of shooting at two, three, even four times the distance, it should nevertheless be a good starting point to know what difference there may be, if any, at 100 yards.