Yea buddy! I am shooting the 153s out of my CM now around 2650 but need more ass. A nice big dose of RL26 should get them over 3K in the PRC/SS.my 6.5SS is rockin with 153.5 bergers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestYea buddy! I am shooting the 153s out of my CM now around 2650 but need more ass. A nice big dose of RL26 should get them over 3K in the PRC/SS.my 6.5SS is rockin with 153.5 bergers
For me, I simply don't want to compete with the gamer kids and their disposable barrel Gay Tiger space rifles in open division simply because I don't want to shoot a barrel burner 6mm or a .308.
Well 223 and 308 barrels last a long time. So if you are poor you can shoot in a division that you won't need a barrel for a long time. Not completely it but there's 1 reason... mil amd le are the other.its a stupid naming of the division. Instead of tac it should be called 223/308 class... then no one would complainI get that 223/308 is at a significant disadvantage. What I'm struggling to see is what the intention of the class is.
Production class (with all it's faults) is intended to allow people to be more competitive with an off the shelf rifle, so that newbies with a stock rifle have a class they can be competitive in.
Open class is open class.
Is tactical class aimed at LEOs/MIL or is it deemed that 308/223 deserves it own class so that folk will actually uses these cartridges?
The OP may have a point if the class is intended for LEOs but they are being excluded due to their work rifle not being 308.
I suspect you are right and the tactical class isn't aimed at LEOs and its just based on a historical view on what a tactical rifle is.
I'm planning on using my 25SAUM for NRL hunter. I finally got the rifle finished and came in at 15.5lbs.25 creed master race will be along shortly![]()
Coming in 32nd and “winning” tac isn’t winning a match. Just shoot open and wory about your overall placement.This is the actual reason for my question, and I'm kinda pissed at the assholes in this thread who assume I'm just whining that I can't be allowed to game TAC division. If I had the ability, I'd just delete this thread.
I'm building a new rifle and I refuse to build a wholly impractical "barricade benchrest" 6mm space rifle. I was hoping that there was a chance I could stay in TAC based on the fact that 6.5CM is being widely adopted by LE/MIL. If I can't, so be it. I'll probably compete for awhile longer with the new gun in open class and see if it's possible to still have fun despite it not being possible to win matches or even improve my relative standing with pure marksmanship without resorting to gamesmanship and gear racing.
Maybe NRL Hunter is more my game but that has very limited popularity here in Texas.
Thinks barrels are the expensive part of this sport......L O LWell 223 and 308 barrels last a long time. So if you are poor you can shoot in a division that you won't need a barrel for a long time. Not completely it but there's 1 reason... mil amd le are the other.its a stupid naming of the division. Instead of tac it should be called 223/308 class... then no one would complain
The only people who really should be shooting TAC are legit LE/MIL who are using their work guns.
So every Monday evening during the daylight savings time months there I was slinging Sierra 155's downrange. Practice pays off, put in the time and effort, better results on match day are to be had. Also shooting a .308 at distance you need Standard Deviations in the single digits.
Thank you for saying this. IMO, this is what justifies Tac class.… Unlike Production, Tac actually does make it more challenging between recoil and ballistics especially with the .308.
Solids change everything. Significant advantage. You can get a .223 to perform almost like a Dasher and can get a .308 to perform like a 6.5CM.Thank you for saying this. IMO, this is what justifies Tac class.
The 308 generates enough recoil that it still necessitates good fundamentals even with a 25lb rifle with an effective brake. And no matter how optimized your 308/223 gamer match rig is, the kid with a factory Howa might make a better wind call and that’s enough to win sometimes.
Again, only people shooting TAC should be those training with work rigs. Everyone else is just trying to win a participation trophy. Same reason people shoot prod.
Again your personal opinion but you are wrong why people shoot Tac. I know for me it’s because I have shot .308 for 30 years and like shooting it in matches as I did before the PRS was a wet dream. I like the challenge and fun of it as I know many others do. Nothing about participation trophies so don’t throw your own opinion on to other people’s reasonings and assume you know. You don’t.
Then go shoot FT-R or Palma or one of the disciplines where that is what everyone else is shooting. That's how competition works.
Like you I shot .308 for a long time, but its time has passed.
How many people shoot Tactical at a large NRL/PRS match? Maybe 5? In our local matches most are local SWAT guys getting in some training. They don't have a choice what caliber to run, so it makes sense for them to compete within the limitations they are forced to use. Its training, not a round a golf with the boys like this is for many.
Would someone buy a set of golf clubs that only lets them hit the ball 70% as far as a challenege? You know golf is so each with modern tech, got to keep it interesting.
With modern solids now TAC is just another gear race like production has become. You will spend just as much if not more than an open shooter to try and win a participation trophy. Its not impressive and people still look down on you the same as a prod shooter.
What is the point of purposely handicapping yourself? Are people able to say "Well i only shot 50% but since i used antiquated tech i actually feel good"?
Is shooting Open not a challenge for you? Were you winning every national match you shot and were so good, you needed to handicap yourself to keep it fun?
Until people start cleaning matches , then its still a challenge and there are things to work on. If you are a competitor, it makes no sense.
I am just saying what the vast majority of competitors are thinking.
I can shit my pants too, doesn't mean I should or shouldn't expect people not to laugh at me when it happens. You are free to shoot whatever you want and we are free to laugh about it.
Doesn't piss me off at all, Its just ironic the same excuses always come up.
Again , just saying what many are thinking.
Where does it say that? You are not making any sense and just pulling words our of your ass.You derive self-worth from your caliber and finishing position at a match?
Actually saying what you are thinking. You by no means speak for a vast majority of shooters. I know there are people that shoot Tac and Production for trophies but they are a vast minority to people who like shooting their rifles they own or are starting in the sport. If a guy is over 55 should they lie about their age to not get something for top senior too?
Also if you think shitting your pants and shooting matches with a rifle you like to have fun are the same thing then again maybe there are bigger issues. LOL And what are "excuses" to some are actual reasons to others.
Bet you have fun too right? See he gets it.I am a mid pack guy with a 223rem with overall scores. Who cares ?
This is exactly fvcking right.I am a mid pack guy with a 223rem with overall scores. Who cares ?
The prize table is a big pain in the dick. Agreed.It also solves the Prize Table dilemma,
You have 3 + tables, A, B, C, and you can balance each table prize wise, so A never takes from C and, C can have just as nice of prizes as A table does.
Then if you want, you can have a special table, Military / Veteran / LE or even RO, and/or Staff, then everyone works within their own sphere or influence and you have nothing to say because you were never gonna take from that table to begin with
No I don't think that. But for some people it makes a huge difference.Thinks barrels are the expensive part of this sport......L O L
Just chop your balls off and shoot Lady Division. Some MD's may just let you get away with a Dress, but that doesn't really show commitment.
Most matches you will win by default. Just don't sign up for any matches that girls 17 and under register for.
Then go shoot FT-R or Palma or one of the disciplines where that is what everyone else is shooting. That's how competition works.
Like you I shot .308 for a long time, but its time has passed.
How many people shoot Tactical at a large NRL/PRS match? Maybe 5? In our local matches most are local SWAT guys getting in some training. They don't have a choice what caliber to run, so it makes sense for them to compete within the limitations they are forced to use. Its training, not a round a golf with the boys like this is for many.
Would someone buy a set of golf clubs that only lets them hit the ball 70% as far as a challenge? You know golf is such an easy hobby with modern tech, got to keep it interesting.
With modern solids now TAC is just another gear race like production has become. You will spend just as much if not more than an open shooter to try and win a participation trophy. Its not impressive and people still look down on you the same as a prod shooter.
What is the point of purposely handicapping yourself? Are people able to say "Well i only shot 50% but since i used antiquated tech i actually feel good"?
Is shooting Open not a challenge for you? Were you winning every national match you shot and were so good, you needed to handicap yourself to keep it fun?
Until people start cleaning matches , then its still a challenge and there are things to work on. If you are a competitor, it makes no sense.
I am just saying what the vast majority of competitors are thinking.
Then go shoot FT-R or Palma or one of the disciplines where that is what everyone else is shooting. That's how competition works.
Like you I shot .308 for a long time, but its time has passed.
How many people shoot Tactical at a large NRL/PRS match? Maybe 5? In our local matches most are local SWAT guys getting in some training. They don't have a choice what caliber to run, so it makes sense for them to compete within the limitations they are forced to use. Its training, not a round a golf with the boys like this is for many.
Would someone buy a set of golf clubs that only lets them hit the ball 70% as far as a challenge? You know golf is such an easy hobby with modern tech, got to keep it interesting.
With modern solids now TAC is just another gear race like production has become. You will spend just as much if not more than an open shooter to try and win a participation trophy. Its not impressive and people still look down on you the same as a prod shooter.
What is the point of purposely handicapping yourself? Are people able to say "Well i only shot 50% but since i used antiquated tech i actually feel good"?
Is shooting Open not a challenge for you? Were you winning every national match you shot and were so good, you needed to handicap yourself to keep it fun?
Until people start cleaning matches , then its still a challenge and there are things to work on. If you are a competitor, it makes no sense.
I am just saying what the vast majority of competitors are thinking.
I can shit my pants too, doesn't mean I should or shouldn't expect people not to laugh at me when it happens. You are free to shoot whatever you want and we are free to laugh about it.
Doesn't piss me off at all, Its just ironic the same excuses always come up.
Again , just saying what many are thinking.
Age is a legitimate class/handicap. Same as Kids. Women is debatable, I would argue women are capable of being better shooters than men but that is a whole different discussion.
More than that, Its good to have those divisions to attract people from non traditional demographics and get them hooked. We aren't limiting their equipment, they shoot the same guns as everyone else because thats how you get better, not shooting some water downed shit. If a grown ass man needs to shoot in a special division because he can't/won't compete against the majority of shooters, that says more about him then everyone else that is laughing at him.
Most of the competitors I shoot with be it top pack, mid pack or even rear pack, when the subject comes up have similar thoughts. People in this sport are incredibly nice and respectful. Maybe they won't say it you your face. Its like telling a dude he stinks or has bad breath. The guy may not even realize it and unfortunately most will be polite and not say a word. But don't assume most aren't thinking it, especailly if the shooter is seasoned and not some kid or newbie who doesn't know better.
But hey, dudes get their dicks chopped off and beat the shit out of women in MMA nowadays so its a new world we live in.
The prize table is a big pain in the dick. Agreed.
My son who tags along with me and shoots as well came up with this idea after seeing how bullshit the table is.
Granted, he's 14, so cut him a little slack, but it made for good conversation.
He chimed in with: "Hey Pop, they should make it so you walk not by individual score but by squad score for prizes (random squadding obviously), and the person who needs the gear in the squad gets whatever they walk the table for. Oh, and the jersey boys get nothing. Screw them. They can shoot for points."
It made for good conversation on the trip home.
I don't know what the solution is, but was a fun conversation walking different ideas around.
Women don't need their own division for competitive reasons. They can and do beat men, same with young guns like Zane and Millard. We have those divisions to get them out shooting so its more inviting. Most kids who don't dry fire 2+ hours a day don't tend to place as well.Im glad you know what the vast majority of competitors are thinking. Oh wait you dont. again its YOUR opinion and no one cares. Literally. Not a single person cares what div you shoot. Youve been a member for a month and already know everything? There are a lot of members here who are legit shooters here who want to learn and help others...and there are a lot of members here who like to hear themselves talk...
Your 30+ posts saying its laughable is evidence it does bother you. I really dont understand it...
As to the same excuses...please man its obviously bothering you. I have shot tac a ton. I hear tons of different reasons (excuses...?) for doing so. Some like Rob's who loves old school shit. Some like the ease of grabbing some factory ammo and blasting. Some like a challenge of holding 2x as much wind. Some thats the only rifle they own.
Some, like me, want to hone their wind calling ability because it really matters. You cant just call left edge and send it.
Some, like me, want be the first to win a PRS match using a 308. Ive done everything else. This is just good fun. Like the article above, I have a top5 at a prs match with my 308. A 4th place shooting factory 155 gr ammo in WA where the wind is nvr fiendly...
Some, like me, want to grab some factory ammo cause I hate reloading.
There is ALWAYS less woman at a match then Tac and it doesnt bother you that they get a trophy? Get some consistency...
And again I call BS, every person I shoot with or have shot with have said it to my face. Thats why I love these spots as we are brutally honest. Each and every one hates getting beat by my 308 lolol. hashtagfacts.
The point is dont put YOUR opinion on us shooters who do it for fun. We are very competitive and love shooting. Say we arnt competitors because we handicap ourselves shows an insurmountable amount of ignorance on your part.
Regards
DT - 2018 PRS Tac Champion
Yes, of course. His initial viewpoint was guys that are getting into competitive PRS style shooting could really use the gear, whereas a jersey shooter has been at it for a few years, learned the ropes, far more equipped, etc. (most time, not always). Obviously the economics of the sport are a bit of a mystery to him, but it made for good conversation and various scenario to think through. (ok, what happens if / when / what's fair if / etc. type discussion). He's also watched me cut my teeth the first few matches I shot, zeroed several stages, shot a 15% match or finish with a dismal shot vs. hit rate percentage, etc. I'm nowhere near a top shooter, but always enjoy most every match, even when I get my teeth kicked in. To the point on the OP, generally speaking I stay far away from the points / class / division game. I just don't care. I just want to shoot.Hopefully you explained to him that “Jersey boys(girls)” are just shooters and still dump a lot of their own money into going to matches. Saying “screw them” is a poor way for him to be looking at anyone in the sport or learning about the sport.
Barrels are actually one of the “expensive” items.
2500 rounds is a fair average between most 6mm (obviously there’s arguments for more and less round count depending on the cartridge and speed).
$700 is about average ($350 for blank and $350 for chambering).
That’s $0.28 per shot. Which is only eclipsed by bullet prices.
If you shoot any decent amount of rounds per year, bullets and barrels are the expensive part. Everything else is a one time expense and if you buy quality equipment, it usually retains a significant amount of resale value. Even at 50% resale, it’s vastly cheaper than bullets and barrels in the long run.
I spend more in gas , match fees, ect than my pro-rated barrel cost.
$675 for Bartlien prefit . 1 day match is about 90 rounds plus 20 or 30 to confirm zero, confirm dope, ect... so 120 rounds.
I estimate about 2500 for what I am shooting so that is 120/2500 or about 5% of barrel cost so about $35. Match is $50, Gas is probably closer to $60-80 since I have to drive 3 hours each way. Bullets are . 40-55 per shot and powder is about .26 per shot and primers are about .10. Brass is about .10 per shot assuming you don't lose a ton and get at least 11 or 12 firings out of them which is not hard to do with Lapua or Alpha.
Even after barrel is "shot out" can still be used for practice so it has some residual value. Could set it back if you really wanted.
So overall the barrel is not really a factor in cost decisions IMO.
People who claim they shoot X barrel because it gives a small improvement to barrel life really don't understand the difference in costs. Even if someone was shooting a .308, their bullets are more expensive, they use more powder,ect...which will eclipse any "cost savings" vs shooting a BR class 6mm.