Re: 6.5x39 GRENDEL!!!!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ryan Woods</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hello everyone,
I have heard that the Grendel is a great round to use for 1000 yard+ range maxing out around 1300 yards. Can anyone offer their 2 cents on that? Also, I think that the maximum efficiency can be obtained from (this is only taking the barrel into consideration) a 24 inch barrel with a 1:9 twist. Does this sound about right? I have heard that it actually outdoes the .308 at 1000 yards and can go even farther. Thanks. </div></div>
The claims of 1300 yards are based solely on the bullet still being supersonic based on the advertised BC and a ballistic computer. Looks good when you compare it to a 6.8 SPC for the never ending 6.5 vs 6.8 game, but not so good when you compare it to a 308 W shooting 155 Scenars, a 284 W shooting 180 VLD's or a 300 Win Mag shooting heavies.
Having shot the Grendel in both AR's and in bolt actions where you can seat far beyond magazine length and load to the limit of the brass, I can state without doubt that the 6.5 Grendel is marginal at 1000 yards. You can even see my rifle as one of the guns of the week over on 6mmBR. Back in the day, tested 8, 8.5, 9, 12, 13 and 14 twist barrels ranging from 14.5 inches out to 32 inches.
There is far more to long range shooting like wind drift and the slow moving light bullets in the Grendel are very easily blown around. I am not talking about totally missing a 10 mph wind call, I can talking about 1-3 variations that people cant read.
When I shot the Grendel in F-Class years ago, it was a challenge to keep 10 shots within the 10 ring, let alone score x's. More often than not, minor wind variations had you dropping points in the 9 and 8 ring. My last "Grendel" was called the 6.5 PPCX and would shoot 108 grain Scenars at 3050 fps. It would shoot very tight groups out to 600, but at 1000 yards, it was not a player. I even had custom made 114 VLD bullets made to see what limits I could find and it still was marginal.
Mark Walker who has replied to this thread was involved over many years with the tests and can tell you the limits that I took the little case.