Accuracy International AT-X

Folds fine with the quiver if you have the AXSR stock.
I decided to swap stocks to try it out; with my LOP the stock and quiver fit but the butt-pad wheel is also slightly still contacting the quiver but not enough to prevent it from closing.

Needs a blue full length bridge and sage green magazine now to complete the look:

PXL_20220518_224442292.jpg


PXL_20220518_224255231.jpg


PXL_20220518_224255231.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TylerN
Returned from Jordan and had a chance to take the 6BR out to zero. A bright and sunny 91 degrees at Quantico's Ironman range.

at-x_ironman3-2391887.jpg


at-x_ironmn1-2391889.jpg


I had to create a shooting lane by pulling out the overgrown grasses so I had a sight picture. Range maintenance is slacking...

at-x_ironman_2-2391888.jpg


After zero, the first five groups, always a flyer! Next step is to test test the SOCOM 7.62RC and Deadair to see which is a better fit.

6br_first_shots-2391890.jpg
 
Hi,
Do you think the SP-6001 +ZCO527 would fit in the ATX with long bridge ? Or is too low ?

SP 6001

0 MIL / 0 MOA

Height 30 mm / 1.18 "
 

Attachments

  • DE72D095-A8F4-4D68-B632-9CEEFBCBF4EF.png
    DE72D095-A8F4-4D68-B632-9CEEFBCBF4EF.png
    570.9 KB · Views: 57
I added a Dead Air brake and was going to test it against the Surefire, but the brake and Sandman-L performed so well I'm leaving them as is. AT-X in 6BR at the Izaak Walton 100yrd range.

IMG_2597-2397967.jpg


Target testing the DA brake and Sandman shooting 105gr factory Lapua. Top left is the first group - I needed to settle in a bit. Top right is with a zero adjustment up and left. Windage was good but I went too high. Bottom left is with the Dead Air Sandman-L. Bottom right is also suppressed with a zero adjustment. That BL group, albeit prone and with a bag, tells me this barrel and cartridge will perform if I do my part.

I shot other groups for velocity testing with the Labradar and while they opened up, they were still averaging well under .75MOA. Velocity of the Lapua was lower than I expected averaging only 2666fps. I assume the barrel will speed up a bit once I get a few more rounds out.

IMG_2603-2397968.jpg


Ballistic-X-Export-2022-05-26_17_24_19_7-2397981.png
 
the RRS adapter does arca and picatinny so you can easily bounce the bipod between many guns.
With regards to the bipod, I dont really find myself using the cant feature much and it is more of a hindrance than a benefit for me, but thats a personal preference thing. With the legs being able to cant I find that the rifle can recoil when using it erratically based on leg-squareness.
 
the RRS adapter does arca and picatinny so you can easily bounce the bipod between many guns.
With regards to the bipod, I dont really find myself using the cant feature much and it is more of a hindrance than a benefit for me, but thats a personal preference thing. With the legs being able to cant I find that the rifle can recoil when using it erratically based on leg-squareness.
Same. The lateral swivel was terrible for me.

Atlas cal , tbac for me
 
Y’all just don’t understand how the ecosystem family of reliable parts work. Screw falls out so we make sure it never falls out. Can’t be happy with nothing. Smdh.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: deersniper
I'm looking at upgrading my bipod on the AT-X. I was thinking of getting an Atlas BT46-NC. Is the Area 419 adapter or the Really Right Stuff BTC-Pro better than the other?

The lever-clamp designs like the RRS are better than the screw down designs like the Area 419 to me. I have a GrayOps mount that on my bipod which I like also to add another option. And agree with what others said about the panning feature being more of a hinderance than help.

PXL_20220528_143404716.jpg


PXL_20220528_143420474.jpg
 
Yeah that’s weird. Mine is closed all the way and not quite touching the quiver.

View attachment 7872513
I wonder if it is because you have your stock locking piece installed correctly, and he has his installed backwards(?). Female end is on the buttstock, and male end is on the stock IIRC.

Mine is set up like yours and it just barely misses hitting the quiver (can just barely see daylight between them).
 
I wonder if it is because you have your stock locking piece installed correctly, and he has his installed backwards(?). Female end is on the buttstock, and male end is on the stock IIRC.

Mine is set up like yours and it just barely misses hitting the quiver (can just barely see daylight between them).

I thought it might have to do with how length of pull and height of the butt stock is setup. Moving those around changes the position of the wheel which was impacting the quiver for me but might not for someone without a different LOP/Height. I went back to the AT-X stock and hinge and went with a soft quiver which of course fits without issues.

And when I did have the AXSR stock installed the locking bits were opposite the AT-X parts. Female part on the chassis and male part on the stock.

PXL_20220528_214226113.jpg


PXL_20220528_214241213.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MarinePMI