-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Yup all the way closed and both spacers worked for me I’m almost 6’2”
I had no idea that there were both spacers and the LOP adjustment on it. It just seemed excessive to me.
But I stand corrected, thank you!
That and I have long ass arms
.I could honestly just use some more of the built in adjustment and ditch the spacers if needed
Anyone use just standard scope rings maybe ARC rings or Spuhr rings on their AT AX conversion rather than a 1 piece ?
You certainly could. No different than running rings on any other rifle with a 1 piece picatinny rail.
I left it on my 338 barrel. I prefer the perpendicular ports of the AI compared to the reverse angled ports of a 419 or APA brake. The AI brake is probably 10-15% less effective but you don't get slapped with any muzzle blast.
Yeah I’m just curious with these AT with ax butt/cheek pieces and high action rails vs height people run on their sticks
What mount are you using? Thanks!Took my teenage son out to the 200 yard range today and let him shoot the AXSR's. 300 WM Elite Sand and 300 NM Flat Dark Earth.
Handled them well.
View attachment 7393463
View attachment 7393468
View attachment 7393475
His 200 yard paper target. Shot up a hard drive too
View attachment 7393476
View attachment 7393478
View attachment 7393479
Here's one of my targets from the 300 NM @ 200 yards, could only get 3 off before they called the line. Still up on the falling apart backer board!
View attachment 7393481
ERA-TAC Adjustable Inclination Mount
www.eratac.de
ERATAC - one-piece mounts of various types › eratac
ERATAC mounts represent highest quality. We have one-piece mounts in short or extended versions, with adjustable inclination and other accessories.
www.eratac.de
ERA-TAC Adjustable Inclination Mount
ERATAC - one-piece mounts of various types › eratac
ERATAC mounts represent highest quality. We have one-piece mounts in short or extended versions, with adjustable inclination and other accessories.
Thank you Sir. I plan on running the MED ZCO rings and was trying to figure out how the 527 would fit on an AXSR.
edit: It sounds like the 1.1" ZCO rings will not fit my application.
Last edited:
56mm objective on a flat top receiver / continuous rail such as the AXSR you would really be needing 1.5” height mount to clear you including scope caps.
Looking at the Era-Tac website it looks like they provide the BH, base height of their scope mounts rather than the standard rail to the centre of the rings. If you went with one, hopefully someone will chime in with which one you need. But Era-Tac along with Spuhr and Tier one are all top quality.
Might also find this useful:
www.milehighshooting.com
Looking at the Era-Tac website it looks like they provide the BH, base height of their scope mounts rather than the standard rail to the centre of the rings. If you went with one, hopefully someone will chime in with which one you need. But Era-Tac along with Spuhr and Tier one are all top quality.
Might also find this useful:
Spuhr, Will It Fit? - Mile High Shooting
Most items from Spuhr are marked with a model number and a batch number. When ordering please refer to the model numbers.
www.milehighshooting.com
Last edited:
Any idea on an AT with AX butt stock, high rail running 34 mm tube and 50 mm objective ya think 1” to 1.18” would work fine ?
If you have the low cheek piece, I don’t see why 1.18” rings wouldn’t work
Yup, I run a Cadex MX1 30 cal but shoot 6.5 creedmoor. Not a problem for me and I can highly recommend the MX1 over the factory AI brake for performance. No numbers to share, but this is based on subjective shoulder feel (and ability to maintain sight on target after the shot)
I wanted to try the spuhr rings they only have 34mm 1” and 1.35”
ARC is 1.10 medium and half the cost with solid technology so maybe I’ll go with the ARC and use the low cheek piece if needed
if 1” spuhr will with I mean it’s only a tenth and 50mm optic I’ll just try them out I guess
I run 1” high spuhr rings on my AT. I have a low action rail but thumbhole not AX stock. I have a hoptic saddle blanket on its lowest setting and it’s only just ok. Need to bury my cheek in to get correct relief.
If your running the high rail that might solve issues with the low cheek piece.
If your running the high rail that might solve issues with the low cheek piece.
Out trying to “catch” a deer today. The AT in its natural environment.
That’s what I was thinking also.... hummmm.... or higher rail, higher stock, same but maybe the lower cheek piece will help...maybe the ARC 1.10 with low cheek piece would be better ?
LOL, that's the same thing the GF asks me everytime I come back from working game control at a local airport. Not cold enough but wet enough here...
I missed the boat on that LRF from SilencerCo. I’ll be out again tomorrow morning before work.
Here’s another from today.
Yes it will work. I run the high rail, Spuhr 1.18 mount, 34mm tube, 56 objective.
1” should work then with 50 mm sounds promising I’ll check into it...worst case 1.10 arc
No. B c all the shooters said they were gay. Then brownells blew them out for $400 now people sell them for $1000
Got my Area 419 hellfire 30 cal brake in today. It looks so tiny with the brake as opposed to the Ultra 9 on the end 
I need them to expedite their ZCO MOA /MOA optic ughGot my Area 419 hellfire 30 cal brake in today. It looks so tiny with the brake as opposed to the Ultra 9 on the end
a 4-20 ZCO MOA would go so good on a rifle build I’m doing
I need them to expedite their ZCO MOA /MOA optic ugh
Gross why?
That’s right hunt and shoot all with one lolSome people need to keep hunting scopes alive
twice the fun 
Similar threads
