I'm over it, looking for an exit.But the weather sure is nice here isn’t it..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm over it, looking for an exit.But the weather sure is nice here isn’t it..
Does anyone else struggle w/ the bolt stop as much as i do? I thought I saw an iteration w/ a tear drop shaped actuator, but these "in the wild" photos dont have that. Now just wondering if i made that up, or if design was changed for some reason.
The original Nucleus prototypes had that but I think they interfered with rear scope rings or opened unintentionally due to inertia (kind of doubtful), so it was changed to a round knob.Does anyone else struggle w/ the bolt stop as much as i do? I thought I saw an iteration w/ a tear drop shaped actuator, but these "in the wild" photos dont have that. Now just wondering if i made that up, or if design was changed for some reason.
Does anyone else struggle w/ the bolt stop as much as i do? I thought I saw an iteration w/ a tear drop shaped actuator, but these "in the wild" photos dont have that. Now just wondering if i made that up, or if design was changed for some reason.
Xylo question:
What magazines fit the long action?
ARC website says 3.78"
MDT website offers 3.715" and 3.85"
Magpul offers 3.7"
I'm guessing the 3.78" is a cartridge length, not magazine length and the MDT 3.85" is the right one but I'm going to ask because this isn't clear at all and magazines are expensive...
Just received #47 and I can attest to not being able to close the bolt once my TT special was installed. I mocked it up in a chassis and while it is better it’s still unacceptable. I’m waiting to hear back from ARC.
I ordered January 25th and received action 00028.
I also have the TT Special and FWIW, there is a bit of forward bolt travel under spring tension just before I can rotate the bolt handle down to the closed position. In my example it's intermittent and it's caused by the spring-loaded rotation lockout plunger in the cocking piece shroud, I gotta say I'm not a fan.
Same deal and I sent the FFL paperwork myself... Oh well, keeps me from buying X,Y or Z trigger while the rest of you figure out which one works.I haven’t heard anything for a week and I think my FFL sent the paperwork...
Do you have a Nucleus? Curious any difference.
Just received #47 and I can attest to not being able to close the bolt once my TT special was installed. I mocked it up in a chassis and while it is better it’s still unacceptable. I’m waiting to hear back from ARC.
ARC just sent an email pertaining to Long Action rails. There's a minor defect near the front (muzzle end). It should still work, just advise not to lock down any ring/mount on that specific spot/slot. That one rail is chamfered. They will send out new rails...hope they send me the correct 30MOA rail.
Sadly, seems expected and not too surprising to see that ARC's new designs have issues and need another iteration or three to make them right. They had issues with Nucleus as well and that action don't' seem fully sorted yet. Still seeing/hearing of people working on spring weights or bolt close feel. And did ARC ever resolve their magazine issues? Hopefully ARC can figure it all out and resolve Nucleus & Archimedes issues before their attention switches to creating another new action next year.
That makes me happy. Sometimes I really have to wonder how much of this is picking nits and how much is truly a problem. I noticed a little extra effort to close on my Nucleus but it never bothered me and after a couple hundred rounds wore in nicely. Original spring and all. Never a misfire and the first two hundred rounds through it were at a shooting school. I always take some of these gripes with a grain of salt and have to wonder how much of it is truly a problem and how much of it is “user error”. Guess I’ll find out soon enough.
Just caught that update. Thank you.I just updated the Sear Engagement thread. They are aware of the issue and working on the solution. It's definitely not nit-picking as I experienced it with my Mausingfield as well. It was straight up shit to run it with a Huber trigger. Clunky, took a lot of force to close the bolt. With a TT, the bolt almost closes itself. It made all the difference in the world. If I wanted to compromise I'd just have a 700 action.
-Dan
Just the Archimedes.Do you have a Nucleus? Curious any difference.
Ted, can we just send our action in with our preferred trigger so we don't end up having to buy an additional piece if needed?
Definitely. that actually makes things much easier for us and I am glad that you brought it up. Also, if you have the capability of modifying a cocking piece, you can also order a 0.055" or 0.065" protrusion and grind for desired bolt closing characteristics. But sending in you trigger is the way to go if you want bump-free close. Also, bear in mind that current increments are only 0.010" which means that you may have up to that amount of pin drop-on-close. But that's OK because that's hard to feel. With a slight drop on close arrangement, if you open the bolt without having pulled the trigger, you'll feel the bolt slightly lift the striker before it fully unlocks.Ted, can we just send our action in with our preferred trigger so we don't end up having to buy an additional piece if needed?
That is awesome to agree too. I have a "short action" that arrived today as a long action, which is fine since I have a long action order and hopefully it will be fulfilled with the short action. Would you be willing to allow me to send two triggers when I send back my "short" long action and fit to the other order I have as well?Definitely. that actually makes things much easier for us and I am glad that you brought it up. Also, if you have the capability of modifying a cocking piece, you can also order a 0.055" or 0.065" protrusion and grind for desired bolt closing characteristics. But sending in you trigger is the way to go if you want bump-free close. Also, bear in mind that current increments are only 0.010" which means that you may have up to that amount of pin drop-on-close. But that's OK because that's hard to feel. With a slight drop on close arrangement, if you open the bolt without having pulled the trigger, you'll feel the bolt slightly lift the striker before it fully unlocks.
Ted
No but reducing the diameter back there as he said should^^^^^ I dont think that little relief cut is gonna fix that
Yes, I just hope that it doesn't induce binding. My action is working great with a TT diamond trigger. I think I'll wait a bit before sending it in for replacement.No but reducing the diameter back there as he said should
Thanks for this post. That's helpful and it's about what I am expecting. Please use our sales email to contact us and we will send a shipping label immediately so that we can fix this.On my example, the TriggerTech Special sear contacts the large-diameter portion of the bolt body even when the action is cycled gently while inverted.
Clean the area:
View attachment 7150791 View attachment 7150792
Apply a very thin layer of grease:
View attachment 7150793
And the results:
View attachment 7150794 View attachment 7150795
If you are happy with the way your action is functioning, you don;t have to send it to us. This will not be a problem with every action and user. It depends on which trigger is used and how the action is cycled. If it feels good to you, keep shooting. Should you ever choose to replace the trigger and experience a problem because of it, we can address it at that time.Yes, I just hope that it doesn't induce binding. My action is working great with a TT diamond trigger. I think I'll wait a bit before sending it in for replacement.
Yes but I don't think there is an advantage in doing so simply because bolt body remains extremely strong after the rework is complete and the machining is straight forward either way.Hi Ted,
Is cutting or grinding a flat similar to the patch around the bolt handle pivot pin an option instead of turning the diameter down?
No. We are not reducing the diameter of the bolt that engages the aft portion of the receiver. The clearance between the bolt and the receiver remains the same.How does the bolt fit in the rear of the action with .020 turned off? Does it allow any additional lateral movement that isn't there now?
Ted, can we just send our action in with our preferred trigger so we don't end up having to buy an additional piece if needed?
Yes but I don't think there is an advantage in doing so simply because bolt body remains extremely strong after the rework is complete and the machining is straight forward either way.
Ted