Battle Stocks for ARs

Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So you dont like Larue? I did not know Larue was only homo oriented. I guess thats why they use the DPMS pattern. You can call Texas gay all you want. Atleast this state has everything and more you could want. Except the mexicans. </div></div>

Why dont you ask Mark to make you a stock out of metal for your AR. Probably cause he would laugh at you, if a stock needed to be made out of metal dont you think that he would have done it on his Overpriced Bullshit Rifle?

By the way NO I dont like that asshole.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Outsy</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So you dont like Larue? I did not know Larue was only homo oriented. I guess thats why they use the DPMS pattern. You can call Texas gay all you want. Atleast this state has everything and more you could want. Except the mexicans. </div></div>

Why dont you ask Mark to make you a stock out of metal for your AR. Probably cause he would laugh at you, if a stock needed to be made out of metal dont you think that he would have done it on his Overpriced Bullshit Rifle?

By the way NO I dont like that asshole. </div></div>


DANG!!!! Easy man!!! I love my OBR! Of course I got a lot better price on it than they are selling for now.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

goathead, you are truly a fucking retard. You have contradicted yourself repeatedly, and are even stupid enough to associate books you've read with real world experience.

But keep it up, every forum needs a dumbass.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Oh my god, can someone not like Magpul? Is Magpul the muslims of the firearm world? Am I not allowed to talk shit about magpul? Am I going to get bombed now because I dont agree with the masses on this site? Is Magpul the god of the AR15? No.

Here is magpuls list of products:
1: magzines for AR15 and SR25 pattern rifles
2: polymer sights
3: Five different stocks, none of which I fin comfortable.
4: grips
5: MOE handguards
6: triggerguards

None of these products do I want for my Armalite AR10. So I have 6 different reasons to say to hell with Magpul. They offer nothing I want, so I can say fuck Magpul for that reason. Is that not good enough? If not, so fucking what. Yall act like Im butthurt because of Magpul. When all I wanted to know was about different stocks, made one comment about magpul and started forum world war 5. Good god, I should have been more productive on my day off.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Instead of shooting him again and wasting my precious ammo, I would like to be able to take my butt and smash it across his head to put him out before I commence to cleaning.</div></div>

When you do this, be sure to have both hands on the barrel, with the muzzle oriented at the idiot.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Oh my god, can someone not like Magpul? Is Magpul the muslims of the firearm world? Am I not allowed to talk shit about magpul? Am I going to get bombed now because I dont agree with the masses on this site? Is Magpul the god of the AR15? No.

Here is magpuls list of products:
1: magzines for AR15 and SR25 pattern rifles
2: polymer sights
3: Five different stocks, none of which I fin comfortable.
4: grips
5: MOE handguards
6: triggerguards

None of these products do I want for my Armalite AR10. So I have 6 different reasons to say to hell with Magpul. They offer nothing I want, so I can say fuck Magpul for that reason. Is that not good enough? If not, so fucking what. Yall act like Im butthurt because of Magpul. When all I wanted to know was about different stocks, made one comment about magpul and started forum world war 5. Good god, I should have been more productive on my day off. </div></div>

Well it's more your attitude toward Magpul- you present your attitude as intense dislike- some would call it hate. A simple- "Magpul doesn't offer anything I'm interested in" would be plenty to let everyone know their stocks don't suit you. But instead you bad mouth them because they don't make YOUR style mag (guess the FAL guys should be crying too huh?), say they make nothing for the AR10 (which I guess would be true if you don't include 85% of their products).

It has nothing to do with the fact that you don't care for magpul- it's the reasons you've given, that most people would agree are immature reasons. That and you contradict yourself regularly.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Good god, I should have been more productive on my day off. </div></div>

Was it a teacher work day, or did you kids get out for a special occasion?
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

1) your argument is largely incoherent psychobabble at this point, but let me point out that many people have done what I suggest and it does not fill the gun with glass. I don't honestly know where you come up with this shit. Watch SEI's video on it if you really want to see how. You can google that your own self.

I'd like to thank DP425 for the confirmation, because he has worked on a two-way range and knows more than a little about these things.

On the breaking of glass:
I threw that out for your sake, since you asked about it. I don't personally go around breaking windows with my gun, and did not buy mine for that. I do think it ould suffice, but I don't see myself doing it. I bought mine because it is very effective flash suppression for NVG use. However it will probably get dumped totally when I get a can for this gun. I couldn't really give a crap less if you think troy FH are for mall ninjas. Troy is hit & miss on quality IMHO, that is a different thread all together.

On magpul:
circular arguments will just get your torched on this board. You don't have to like or use their stuff, but do like I said and just quityerbitchin. They are not the scum of the earth just because it's not your flavor.

On Abe:
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Oh BCW1284, screw Abe Lincoln. He was nothing more than a socialist tyrant in his day. </div></div>

...and is still considered a great orator, a ruthless tactician, a charismatic leader. Obviously too much for your small mind to comprehend.

You have to see the "politics of Lincoln" for what they were, a tool with which to defeat his enemy. Nobody said he was a cuddly dude, Ghengis Khan was not either, but that does not preclude him from joining the same list of history's master tacticians. I don't agree with everything Lincoln did, but I think Sun Tzu would have been proud! Do you even know who that is?

To compare Lincoln to Obama is to play into the propaganda of the left who seek desperately to validate themselves when they know there isn't much else to stand on. I've got another quote for you: "IT'S A TRAP!" That is all I will say, as further discussion is contrary to Frank's main rule: NO POLITICS.



Anyway, I'm done trying to educate you because it is like talking to the wall... except the walls here were not nailed up with an AR-10 hammer.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VAJayJayPunisher</div><div class="ubbcode-body">no offense, but wouldnt a knife do the trick? been working since the cavemen. Have anger issues? You know most serial killers begin by beating, harming, killing animals</div></div>

you sir are a prophet, lol.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

I dont see how I am contradicting myself. I am a vulgar person, profanities make their way out of my mouth with most things I say. Even nice ones. I have attitude towards everything. Im not emotionally invested as most of you are making me out to be. I just intensely said screw magpul. They have nothing I am interested in. Im not a formal person, I am from Texas, and do not care how the things I say affect people. I bad trait I know, but I dont care about that stuff. I just simply wanted to know what other companies are offering stocks that are similar to what ACE LTD is making. Then I made a rude comment about Magpul, and this thread has veered far off topic. So, I will be civil, I apologize for being a "forum troll" and upsetting the majority of you. Its that time of the month for my girlfriend, so Im sure it is for alot of you too. Im not the type to tuck my tail between my legs and not post when you start talking shit.

And about the press checking, Ive never heard it called press checking when talking about the ARs. That is a pistol term and I am stupid for not realizing it. But one of the gun mags I subscribe to has an editor who referred to visually checking for a round in your AR similar to that of press checking your pistols. So, Ill admit I was dumbfounded on that one. But atleast I got press checking right.

Ill admit, Im no AR genius. Ive been raised on bolt guns and this is actually my first AR. Im not following any creed or specific goal to building my AR10 except to build is as tough as possible. Something that could be passed down 50years from now and still be a viable weapon to take into combat. If they made a stock out of all aluminum, it would not be very heavy, better suited to balance the bigger 308 ARs, and would be strong as shit as long as the right material was used. So I apologize if I seem to have contradicted myself. I still dont see how I have with my posts, but everyone has their own opinion.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

7: asap sling mount.. which works great i might add...

goathead.. i understand you don't like magpul.. thats ok.. which is the same as me saying i don't like armalite.. because they make me use there mags.. which i dislike.. hence i don;t own armalites.. never have never will.. kac/dpms just makes more sense to me.. plus i can use my BELOVED MAGPUL PMAGS in 308..

this will be the third post of the original question content..
http://www.del-ton.com/AR_15_Buttstock_p/bs1086.htm

now for the bashing a zombie, half dead boar, neighborhood kids, the annoying dog next door.. hey man, whatever floats your boat..

but my view is, there are better ways to kill a half dead boar, why not get a front site with a bayonet lug..

from your posts and everyone elses, the topic went way off the original content.. what you do with your alum buffer tube is your thing.. but i would not recommend bashing anything in with an ALUM carbine buffer tube.. ace hammer stock, or standard buffer tube..

just my 2 cents.....

p.s. why not just buy a louisville slugger to beat the boar with??? just a thought...
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Armalite makes a bayonet lug, but they said its for the carbine 308s and will not work on the 20inchers. And on ACE's site, they said they make a new buffer tube to match. But that is not on Del-tons site.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Well, here's one contradiction, but there are several others.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The skulls I am wanting to bash belong to hogs, not zombies, not people, but a hog thats lying there bleeding to death. Instead of shooting him again and wasting my precious ammo, </div></div>

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The safety doesnt go on unless is cocked, even then if doubt is in your mind in a combat situation, just we rack a round. So what if you loose one. </div></div>

You also talked about needing this stock for a civil war in case you run out of ammo, but now your story has changed to bashing pigs. Maybe they haven't "learned" you on those big words yet, like contradiction.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Armalite makes a bayonet lug, but they said its for the carbine 308s and will not work on the 20inchers. And on ACE's site, they said they make a new buffer tube to match. But that is not on Del-tons site.</div></div>

the ace stock if you look at the picture, comes with a buffer tube, ie the 7 postion blah blah one that ace showed on there site..

as for no bayonet lug.. well.. mr slugger.. would work...???
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Lincoln a ruthless tactician? You are the only one I have heard say that about Honest Abe. Maybe a political tactician, yes. Militarily, no. It was more of Grants decisions that sealed the fate for the South, militarily speaking. Trying to give a politician credit that belongs to a military man, how dare you. I consider Abe and Obama like minded simply because of the socialistic point of views. They use the "better of the nation" to trick people into getting what he and his cabinet wants. I would consider Abe a far better man than Obama any day. But as a politician, no respect.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

I thought the only issue with fitting a front sight / bayonet lug was the barrel diameter, the type of muzzle device fitted and how far down from the muzzle the gas block is?

Even then there are extenders for bayonet handles.......

But am i alone in thinking fixing bayonets seems a little excessive...or even just plain wierd..... for hunting applications
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Hunting and combat situations are different. I use specific ammo for hunting. In a combat scenario, surplus ammo would be used. I figured that would be able to left unsaid. But thats another thing I know nothing about, right?

I want the stock to bash pigs heads in. I would like a stock that could be used in a combat scenario, to bashing pigs heads in would mean its tough enough for a civil war. All my guns are to be used in a civil war, thats what our 2nd amendment is for. If our government gets to bossy, we use our second amendment to solve the problem. And the would mean people grabing every gun they have. Even the 17hmr and 2lrs. Everything counts
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hunting and combat situations are different. I use specific ammo for hunting. In a combat scenario, surplus ammo would be used. I figured that would be able to left unsaid. But thats another thing I know nothing about, right? </div></div>

I thought this was all about pigs. Now you're back to post apocalyptic combat?
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Lincoln a ruthless tactician? You are the only one I have heard say that about Honest Abe. Maybe a political tactician, yes. Militarily, no. It was more of Grants decisions that sealed the fate for the South, militarily speaking. Trying to give a politician credit that belongs to a military man, how dare you. I consider Abe and Obama like minded simply because of the socialistic point of views. They use the "better of the nation" to trick people into getting what he and his cabinet wants. I would consider Abe a far better man than Obama any day. But as a politician, no respect.</div></div>


If you think any of the larger crippling overtures against the south were not rooted in Lincoln's mind, then you sir need to read more... just about history, not ar-10 hammers and press checking or anything else some "gun rag" told you. Nobody said he was out in the trenches, but he was indeed puppet master on both the political and military sides... much to the chagrin of his generals who feared for his safety and who had other ideas about how to handle the campaigns. Lincoln was known to show up at the field HQ and start doling out orders about how to proceed. Reading is a valuable tool, you're just doing it wrong.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Surplus ammo? By this do you mean excess ammo or are you using the term to describe military issue ammo no longer required and sold for civilian use?

I thought your reason for doing this was to cover the "out of ammo" scenario or saving precious ammo when finishing wounded animals?

Seems to me you're so tied up in knots you've lost the plot.

You all have a nice day now!
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BasraBoy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I thought the only issue with fitting a front sight / bayonet lug was the barrel diameter, the type of muzzle device fitted and how far down from the muzzle the gas block is?

Even then there are extenders for bayonet handles.......

But am i alone in thinking fixing bayonets seems a little excessive...or even just plain wierd..... for hunting applications</div></div>

You're not alone, and it is weird. It's also not legal in a lot of places. It's every bit as weird as crushing in some animals skull instead of just giving it a humane slice to the jugular, or a second round to the face. I realize they may be pests, but the animal didn't choose to be born one, so why prolong the agony out of some sick sense of revenge? That's some seriously twisted shit there. I kill a lot of little fuzzies because they dig holes in the pasture and endanger the cattle, horses, and bigger game with leg-breaking holes. But I don't go up and curb stomp them, I just kill 'em and let nature sort it out.

We must see it for what it is: he made comments about post-apocalyptica and then tried to mask it when people said he had too much tinfoil on. There are SHTF boards our there, he should know where to take that stuff (and it's not here).
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

See, you are turning my posts around. Im done, that is the only point of this thread now is to turn every one of my posts around. If you are that stupid to not understand the point I am getting across, then stop reading. Its really that easy.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I dont see how I am contradicting myself. I am a vulgar person, profanities make their way out of my mouth with most things I say. Even nice ones. I have attitude towards everything. Im not emotionally invested as most of you are making me out to be. I just intensely said screw magpul. They have nothing I am interested in. Im not a formal person, I am from Texas, and do not care how the things I say affect people. I bad trait I know, but I dont care about that stuff. I just simply wanted to know what other companies are offering stocks that are similar to what ACE LTD is making. Then I made a rude comment about Magpul, and this thread has veered far off topic. So, I will be civil, I apologize for being a "forum troll" and upsetting the majority of you. Its that time of the month for my girlfriend, so Im sure it is for alot of you too. Im not the type to tuck my tail between my legs and not post when you start talking shit.

And about the press checking, Ive never heard it called press checking when talking about the ARs. That is a pistol term and I am stupid for not realizing it. But one of the gun mags I subscribe to has an editor who referred to visually checking for a round in your AR similar to that of press checking your pistols. So, Ill admit I was dumbfounded on that one. But atleast I got press checking right.

Ill admit, Im no AR genius. Ive been raised on bolt guns and this is actually my first AR. Im not following any creed or specific goal to building my AR10 except to build is as tough as possible. Something that could be passed down 50years from now and still be a viable weapon to take into combat. If they made a stock out of all aluminum, it would not be very heavy, better suited to balance the bigger 308 ARs, and would be strong as shit as long as the right material was used. So I apologize if I seem to have contradicted myself. I still dont see how I have with my posts, but everyone has their own opinion. </div></div>


I will state one more time, then leave this thread alone as it is apparent the notions here are not gaining any traction.

Press-check is a tactic, not a weapons handling procedure and such it has nothing to do with weapon loading condition. But, since you assumed that's the direction it was going, I'll clue you in- to close a bolt after checking the chamber on a rifle without a FA, you push the BCG forward using the notch cut out for the spring-detent on the dust cover.

This was a demonstration on the fact that VERY important tactics and procedures are not something you just happen across from some light reading. Despite the fact that you had previously presented yourself as having tactical, MOUT/CQB and weapons employment knowledge gained from extensive research, an incredibly simple, yet highly vital tactic such as press-check escaped your grasp. You related the knowledge you gained through discussion and books to the knowledge trigger pullers gain through formal school training, informal unit training, doctrine, field manuals and SOP's. In fact, the two simply do not relate.

I'm stepping out of this thread now- the entertainment value is gone and it is apparent you are dead-set on the need to bludgeon things with your AR.

How old are you? You avoided that question before.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">See, you are turning my posts around. Im done, that is the only point of this thread now is to turn every one of my posts around. </div></div>

By Jove, I think he's got it.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">See, you are turning my posts around. Im done, that is the only point of this thread now is to turn every one of my posts around. If you are that stupid to not understand the point I am getting across, then stop reading. Its really that easy.</div></div>

You really have some serious hostility and anger issues you need to get sorted out.

And you're not getting any point across...just a bunch of inane and contradictory ramblings with no evidence of any coherent or consistent thought process.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Does anybody else feel dumber after reading this thread? I know I do. I'm young, and I don't even talk about this shit. You my friend are not smart at all. If you are hunting I presume you carry a knife? I could be wrong and you take it back to camp before gutting it. But most (all I've ever been around) carry a knife and usually even a pistol when hunting. So lets say you carry a knife like your average hunter does, couldn't you simply cut the throat of the whatever it is you're killing. Bashing a pigs skull would not get you very far at all, wounded or not, by the time you got a crack in the skull you'd be too tired to pull the animal out, have blood all over you and the rifle, probably a broken rifle no matter what you have on it, and if anybody sees you doing it a trip to the local psych ward.

I'm gonna go get more popcorn now, and to the older generation here I promise you we're not all like this guy.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Im against using anything Magpul because they are against making mags for Armalites.</div></div> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I dont care that Magpul does not make Pmags for Armalite. </div></div>



so exactly what the flying FUCK are you trying to say here?
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kahlendrrari</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Im against using anything Magpul because they are against making mags for Armalites.</div></div> <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I dont care that Magpul does not make Pmags for Armalite. </div></div>



so exactly what the flying FUCK are you trying to say here? </div></div>
I just finished reading this thread and what a good question. It wasn't what I was thinking when I first clicked on it but a good read anyways.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VAJayJayPunisher</div><div class="ubbcode-body">for a good time read his other posts, particularly the battle rifle thread</div></div>

See what you mean.

Anyone who posts shit like this:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As for Fallout 3, that game makes me upset because you can kill everything but children, <span style="font-weight: bold">you can enslave a few kids, but not kill them</span>. </div></div>

needs to be put away for a very long time......

He's the kind of retard who'll make the news for all the wrong reasons.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Hell, I didn't make it all the way throught the first page before the "I hate Magpul....I don't hate magpul" popped up

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Instead of shooting him again and wasting my precious ammo, </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> just we rack a round. So what if you loose one. </div></div>

and now is talking about not wanting to use another bullet to finish off his hunt, but he'll rack another round and "waste" one if he's unsure whether or not his weapon is loaded
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I was wondering what a good stock would be for bashing shit in. Whether it be a car window, door, skull, whatever, I have been looking around for a replacement stock, and I want something I could use as a weapon when Im out ammo, but it hold up to major abuse to function when I do get hands on ammo again.
</div></div>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This sums it all up in a nutshell,YOU are the one that added Bashing in Hog Skulls to not waste "Another Round of My Precious Ammo",Killing Pests in a Violent Manner,the Fuck Magpul Posts because they don't make anything for your Armalite,Us not buying Armalite because we are too cheap.Civil War in one post and deny it in the next....................

Last but not Least,I don't think any of us needed to know your Old Lady is on the Rag right now
sick.gif
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VAJayJayPunisher</div><div class="ubbcode-body">for a good time read his other posts, particularly the battle rifle thread </div></div>
thanks man ill check it out, this one is already epic...scoot over gecko45 theres somethin leaner
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

By the way, you shouldnt talk about Texas like that. Just because this asshole is from here, doesnt mean he represents the entire state. Texas is great for many reasons, I wont bicker about it, Im just saying, leave Texas alone. Rip this guy a new asshole, just leave The Lone Star State out of it, please?
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Im not talking about military issue firearms when I said Americans like cheap things. I was talking about DPMS in particular. I dont care that Magpul does not make Pmags for Armalite. That was never the point of my anti-magpul rant. Everything they design was for the M4. And all stocks fit both patterns just about. So they did not design anything for the 308 ARs except the mags. And the mag itself will work in the Armalite, you just have to sand it down a bit and dremel a catch that works. I dont care that much, I just said Magpul offers nothing I need so to hell with them. If that gets your panties in a wad, fuck Magpul. Magpul can suck Obama's dick for all I care. All I said was Im anti magpul because they are anti Armalite. To each his own, so get over it. I want a stock I can brutally bash in a boars skull to conserve my ammo. So what? I dont care about zombies, my end goal for my guns is to be used in the next civil war. If it doesnt happen in my lifetime, my weapon stash will be passed down. So piss off if you dont agree with me, this is America and you have the right to talk your shit. Also in America, and even better in Texas, I have the right to put whatever lego bolt on I want to my firearm. Its mine, I paid for it. Its not issued by the military, or competing in some gun match that has restrictions to mods, so I can do what I want to my gun. I have never talked about running and gunning during SHTF. I just asked if there were other options. Im not the one who blew this thread out of proportion. Just because I said I dont like Magpul, this thread turned into bashing me for being a mall ninja. Because I dont like magpul. Good god, America will never return to glory. </div></div>You'd be better off spending your money on some therapy. You got issues, man.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

Agreed, get some help man, and please give your guns to the nearest authority before you abuse them and hurt someone. It's people like you that cause other people to want to ban guns, you literally are making your own enemies with your illusions of civil wars and bashing in hog brains. Personally I find it hard to believe you haven't given up and left or been banned.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: marduk185</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VAJayJayPunisher</div><div class="ubbcode-body">for a good time read his other posts, particularly the battle rifle thread </div></div>
thanks man ill check it out, this one is already epic...scoot over gecko45 theres somethin leaner </div></div>I guess he finally irritated the guys here as well. He migrated here because he didn't last very long on the AR10 forum on ARFCOM. Want more entertainment?

goathead on arfcom
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GoatHead</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Im no forum troll. I joined this site to get in on the group buy for Iron Ridge Arms. Nothing more. If I offended you, I do apologize your sensitivity levels are extremely high. Or is it your estrogen levels have spiked? Either way, Walgreens has an assortment of Midol for you to choose from. </div></div>

Sweet, is the iron ridge arms buy over? Well since your here for no other reason, you can go pollute someone elses site, how about that? Possibly a warbased videogame forum where the rest of your retarded brethren live. Seriously your ridiculous exagerated rhetoric and childish comebacks and backtracking on your own statements is prototypical of ridiculous, apathetic talk hard do nothing kids that are saturating out younger generation and making the rest look bad. Seriously, I know this will probably only instigate you more, but just go away. Only a person of exceeding ignorance would walk into a room and say retarded shit and then try to double up and save face by trying to rational the initial dumb statements on one hand, and on the other pretend like disturbung the party was his main intent.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Nihonjin</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: marduk185</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VAJayJayPunisher</div><div class="ubbcode-body">for a good time read his other posts, particularly the battle rifle thread </div></div>
thanks man ill check it out, this one is already epic...scoot over gecko45 theres somethin leaner </div></div>I guess he finally irritated the guys here as well. He migrated here because he didn't last very long on the AR10 forum on ARFCOM. Want more entertainment?

goathead on arfcom </div></div> That thread on ar15*com is priceless.
GoatHead, <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF0000"> <span style="font-size: 23pt">YOU ARE A FUCKING RETARD!</span></span></span>
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

You know...another day, another perspective.

I think GoatHead has done us all afavour - there is a gap in the market for a new stock....one that meets the serious threat from half-dead zombie piggies when ammo is in short suppoly following the apocalypse.

I've been up all night in the workshop meeting that need:

Here is is:

DSCF0367.jpg


I call it the TrollHammer Stock (GH model)

Note the carefully crafted QD mounts to prevent damage to the buffer tube.

The sharp-eyed amongst you will note that this is fitted to a MagPul UBR tube. Further developments will see this adapted to other manufacturer's stocks - just for those of you who have a pathological hatred of anyhing from this company.

After a power breakfast brain storm with my Head of R&D (my 13 year old son) we decided out next product will be a more "tactical" battle rifle adaptation of the TrollHammer - we will be marketing this under the name The MeatHead:

Here is a sneak preview:

DSCF0368.jpg


We are planning full production to commence only after full field trials are conducted by an esteemed member of Sniper's Hide at their private test facility somewhere in Texas.
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BasraBoy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You know...another day, another perspective.

I think GoatHead has done us all afavour - there is a gap in the market for a new stock....one that meets the serious threat from half-dead zombie piggies when ammo is in short suppoly following the apocalypse.

I've been up all night in the workshop meeting that need:

Here is is:

DSCF0367.jpg


I call it the TrollHammer Stock (GH model)

Note the carefully crafted QD mounts to prevent damage to the buffer tube.

The sharp-eyed amongst you will note that this is fitted to a MagPul UBR tube. Further developments will see this adapted to other manufacturer's stocks - just for those of you who have a pathological hatred of anyhing from this company.

After a power breakfast brain storm with my Head of R&D (my 13 year old son) we decided out next product will be a more "tactical" battle rifle adaptation of the TrollHammer - we will be marketing this under the name The MeatHead:

Here is a sneak preview:

DSCF0368.jpg


We are planning full production to commence only after full field trials are conducted by an esteemed member of Sniper's Hide at their private test facility somewhere in Texas.</div></div>


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Re: Battle Stocks for ARs

The GH is indeed rubber. We decided on this to keep costs down so that there would be more budget for the owner/user to sepnd on "precious ammo". This was part of the customer's original design brief.

However we are confident that we wil be able to market the MeatHead at a price close enough to the GH to make this a viable alternative for those needing a more aggresive threat elimination option.