I will have to say m&P9c specifically for the size, capacity and accuracy. I think it is a great sc gun and conceals well with a raven owb or any variation of hybrid iwb holsters.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For those of you that went with the S&W Shield can you tell me if you compared the 9c can you tell me what got you to go with the Shield? Its a bit narrower, with the Mag extension is not shorter handled as compared to the 9c.
I cant currently get the Shield however I am interested in what convinced you over the 9c.
Thanks....
Drpends on how you like to carry. For me I like IWB and thickness is more of a concern than handle length and to a certain extent barrel length. Im a stringbean at 6' 165# so the thinner guns help IWB. Now OWB the handle length is a concern as thats what seems to print on me as my waist is onky 31".For those of you that went with the S&W Shield can you tell me if you compared the 9c can you tell me what got you to go with the Shield? Its a bit narrower, with the Mag extension is not shorter handled as compared to the 9c.
I cant currently get the Shield however I am interested in what convinced you over the 9c.
Thanks....
G26. With a mag extension its about the smallest you can go, while still being accurate. I have medium size hands and any smaller would be impossible to shoot. 12 rounds of 9mm in a gun of the size is hard to beat.
Most of the smaller guns will have relibility issues. Put 1000+ through them all and it will be clear why the glock is used.
If you carry a g26 with mag extension, why wouldn't you just carry a g19? Its only 1 more inch to conceal and that 1 inch sure helps with MV and accuracy. Just my opinion though. The one thing I would recommend to the OP is to at least find a pistol you can get a full grip with. Losing that pinky on a grip (for me) was detrimental to my accuracy and recoil control.
Curious here also, I'm torn between these two.
...the Sig is head a shoulders above the rest, especially in 9mm.
I prefer the M&P 9c. The Shield is definitely smaller, but the round count is comparatively low when compared with with 9c. I live in bloody hot Central FL and the 9c conceals well with just about any clothing.
After much discussion and debate, my wife and I went out to buy a cc handgun for her yesterday. I was steering her towards a SW 637/638 J-Frame, but she wanted a pistol. We spent the day handling almost every gun mentioned above...KT PF9, Kahr, Shield, etc. She came back every time to the Glock 26. Walked into one last store @ about 1630 and they had a Gen 4, G26 in stock. Somehow the rascal managed to sneak home with us.
She liked that it has no external safeties, and is big enough to shoot comfortable. In her words: "What good is a gun if it's so small I can't shoot it well and don't want to train with it? This is cool and I want to shoot it." What can I say? She has good taste and more common sense than most, I guess.
Excellent choice! She may need more than just the pistol to be good to go though. Tell her she may like the pinkie finger extension, try 'em (one adds a couple 9mm rounds too I think, another one doesn't). I have these on both my CC .40 G27 and 10mm G29. Only way my wife will fire either. I use 2 full size 15rd. G22 or G20 mags for reloads; more rounds plus it extends the grip (they make covers that make it feel like a full grip, but I just use the bare mag). I'd get tritium sights no matter what --all my pistols have 'em. I think XS Big Dots would be nice on a small carry pistol, but I didn't know of 'em when I got my carry pistols. Either a handheld Surefire (my wife has a 2 batt. E series, non-mil looking purplish anodize color she's had for YEARS, I have an E1, a grey 1 cell light for just as long) or a small, weapon mounted one if she carries in her purse and can get away with it. Someone makes a really compact light. Still keep a handheld in the bag though. A good light is a must.
A good holster is key, if she goes for the purse, look at the Coronado Leather, my wife loves her leather purse. Very well made, made in US. Lots of designs. There is one holster maker, a decent quality one, and I forget the name... They make IWB (and OWB?) holsters for women that fit their hips.
I'd also try to find the mags at the right price and stock up on what you perceive to be the number of mags you'll need for the lifetime of that weapon. Possibly some spare parts and springs, particularly those that wear. Stock Glock stuff. This way your high cap 9mm doesn't turn into a 7 or 10 round paperweight. Got my first Glock, a G21 in 98 during the ban. Mags were $120 each and not built as well as todays. Also, Glock mags can wear out over time with use.
Good luck and good choice, proud of her, she made a great decision I think. Make sure she understands how the Glock is meant to be carried, trigger covered, nothing else inside of carry pocket if she uses a purse. Wish my wife had picked a G26, she ALMOST did at the PX recently, but still just favors her old, stainless, .357 S&W 5-shot concealed hammer J-Frame w/ speedloaders and those long Crimson Trace laser grips (don't look at me, she still knows the basics, and the off hand out, revolver close to her belly/hip for very close encounters). I think the grip helps her with her point shooting, but to keep her from being dependent on it, we disabled it from time to time.
M&P 9 compact or the Sheild, nothing else comes close to the feel IMO. A Kahr P9 was my carry pistol for a while, it is a great size for CCW but full 9mm loads are a little tough on the hands and it didn't hold many rounds. Once I played with the M&P compact, then installed a Apex trigger kit, I was in love.
Curious here also, I'm torn between these two.
OP, take a hard look at the Baretta Nano. Same concept as Shield, and better trigger out of the box.
The Nano as I said requires no trigger work.
You have got to be joking about the Beretta Nano trigger. Do you own one?
Let me clarify Shanks, to keep your heartburn down.
The Nano trigger was better out of the box than the Shield. As I said, I don't own either but shot both 2 weeks ago in the same range session. M&P's are known to have shitty triggers, which is why most people put in the the APEX kit. Once that's done I love the M&P. Even without that mod it's a good gun, but is much better with the APEX.
With the Nano, it wasn't a great trigger, but it was livable. I was able to make hits and the trigger didn't stand out (for crappiness) like the Shield.
Also note that the Shield's trigger was wearing in and got better as the day progressed (200 rds give or take). Very gritty brand new though.
No worries. I was shooting my Nano at distance and couldn;t hold it on target with the trigger pull. Mine must have had one of the stiffer trigger pulls. Cheers.