Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has anyone compared the 5.5-30 to the 3.3-18? I already have the 3-18 and thinking about picking up the big brother.
I own both. What would you like to know?
When’s the reticle usable in the 5-30?I own both. What would you like to know?
When’s the reticle usable in the 5-30?
How much more forgiving is the 5-30 to the 3-18 eye box?
Would you take two 3-18 or have one of both?
this one will be going on a bolt 223. No hunting will he used with it.
I can't decide if my dedicated prs scope should be RZR 2 or XTR III?
What mount did you go with to include the red dot?
Thank you sirPart number for the MIL Race Dial is #626027.
I'm working on getting a part number for the throw lever.
Edit; Throw lever is #626025
That worked perfectly...thanks!Here's another option for recticle images... but these may blur when enlarged...
The links below are the "zoom" images from the Burris SCT 2 MIL webpage:
https://www.burrisoptics.com/reticles/scr-2-mil
Follow these links:
https://www.burrisoptics.com/sites/...s/preview/reticle/scr2-main.png?itok=iHIPI1M3
https://www.burrisoptics.com/sites/...sion-charts/scr2-subtension.png?itok=jeOyb0IR
https://www.burrisoptics.com/sites/...lic/scr2_5.5x-subtensions_1.png?itok=vMli2tB7
These last 2 images appear to be the same. But the site shows both...
https://www.burrisoptics.com/sites/...lic/scr2_5.5x-subtensions_4.png?itok=WIIMxPLh
https://www.burrisoptics.com/sites/...c/scr2_5.5x-subtensions_4-2.png?itok=HsvMiiKm
I recently ordered a 3.3-18x50 in scr mil for hunting, connot find anything on the reticle. There are prints and subtensions on the Burris site of scr moa for both 3.3-18x50 and 5.5-30x56 but nothing in mils. Idk if I can just take the moa value given and divide it by 3.6 to give the mil equivalent, and expect half mil hases in the vertical and 0.2 in horizontal or what. The have everything broke down on the xtr2 models in mil/moa. I've attached a few images I've been able to find, even that brochure has zero data on the xtr3 reticles other than the scr2.
I posted that exact image above. Is the reticle from the 2-10 3-15 xtr2 in the xtr3 3.3-18x50?
How do you get the throw lever in red? It only shows black on the Burris site. Call them?Thank you sir
I'm not sure.How do you get the throw lever in red? It only shows black on the Burris site. Call them?
Only special folks like you (sponsored shooter) can get them in red. I left a VM for Todd in sales to help me outThe red is just what they sent me. I didnt request it.
So I'm not sure how to get the red. Perhaps give CS a call and see what they can do.
Are you sure. When I got mine I think they got a heap to sell as well. I'll have to checkOnly special folks like you (sponsored shooter) can get them in red. I left a VM for Todd in sales to help me out![]()
That's what CS told me. FYI Todd is out until MondayAre you sure. When I got mine I think they got a heap to sell as well. I'll have to check
Only special folks like you (sponsored shooter) can get them in red. I left a VM for Todd in sales to help me out![]()
Any more info on when Illuminated 3-18 model comes out?
I would like this information too. I have reached out to Burris twice and they never reponsded. It is kinda pushing me away from purchasing one of their products.
No one really has an answer to this. The illumination, along with a thicker SCR2 reticle is under construction. It's being worked on by engineers in Greeley, and it goes without saying, they really want to get it right.
The driving factor behind a redesigned system is that they want to use something bulletproof.
Customer service personal aren't really in the engineering loop as far as product updates are concerned. That's a management/development team conversation. So at this point, no one outside of upper management knows where this is at.
@khuber84 kick me a PM with your address. I'll get you a properly anodized turret.
Its a shame they didn't release these with illumination. The lack of illumination has killed the resale of these. I've got a 3.3-18 brand new in the box i can't even get rid of. The other 3.3-18 i shoot with is very impressive, such an awesome scope for 1500 bucks. Knowing how many people want illumination ( and usually still won't ever use it) it blows my mind Burris wouldn't have released this with illumination instead of making it an after thought
The intent of the first release XTR3 has always been as a target/competition optic. Thus the lack of illumination and the thinner reticle.
From a first-hand perspective in the PRS , I love the thin reticle of the SCR2. It's perfectly suited for 10x to 30x magnification on targets in daylight. It is ideal for their intended usage.
The illuminated version was always intended as a follow up release once the competition version got off the ground. It's coming, it just wasnt the focus. The also wanted to get the RT6 Long Range scopes with the SCR2 out into the market place. So both of these products are out now.
I think the illumination and thicker reticle will be extremely well-received when it comes to market. It's going to be a great crossover optic.
I continually see on this forum and others that people like the XTR3 better than the G2 Razor, MK5HD, and NX8. Once illumination hits the market, this is going to be a pretty tough to beat option in the sub $2k price point.
Do you know where they're made? Is this Japanese glass or the Philippines glass of the XTR II?
I don’t actually need illumination but if the illuminated version comes with a thicker reticle, then that corrects my biggest issue with the scope. I hate how reticles have been getting thinner and thinner. .05 mil line thickness needs to come back.
Has anyone had any problems with reticle jump on these scopes? Took it to the range today and had a wandering zero problem. After messing with it for a while I noticed the reticle jumps .3 to .5 mil (not precise, to the best I can tell) when raising or lowering the magnification. I sent Burris a email when I got home (aware they are closed on the weekend) but was wondering if this was a known issue that I may have missed while researching. Just a little disappointed after spending this amount of money and having problems out of the gate. Oh well we'll see how it pans out I guess.
I wonder if birdog knows about this issue, he pushes burris hard. Thanks for the feedback above I'll stay away from burris.
Khuber's optic is the only one I'm aware of having this issue.
I'm aware of two other scopes being returned. All were handled in a timely manner and the return issue was resolved. I cant say Burris scopes are perfect. No one can say that about any manufacturer. Give them an opportunity to make it right and go from there. It's still a great scope. The good news on these optics far outweigh the bad.
What type of rifle did you have it on? My 338 rum killed an ares etr in short order as well. It now wears a leupold mk5hd. I purchased another xtr3 3.3-18x50 here a lil while back, no issues with that one, nor the replacement Burris sent me.
Honest Question: you do a better job of repping Burris, supporting their product and communicating with customers than their actual service department; why haven’t they hired you to unfuck their situation?
It was on my match rifle and the funny thing is it has my 223 barrel on it now, it weighs 16lbs. I'm waiting on 2 new 6mm Creed barrels to be delivered. So definitely not some hard recoiling rifle. Pretty sure this scope was like this out of the box, and I missed the issue when mounting it.
Question. The PRS Production class rule states ' The optic shall not exceed $2,000 USD as listed on the company’s website.'
If I go to Burris' website right now, it lists the SCR2 MIL for $1,941. Obviously you can get it cheaper. But it also lists the MSRP for the same at $2,219.
Does this scope qualify for PRS Production Class? If not... huge mistake in the MSRP pricing.
I'd have one of these on order - since I like my Burris Fulfield II scopes on the hunting rifles - but this is a tactical scope with less features than scopes half the price. I realize the glass and FOV and all of that are probably wonderful, but we have to be realistic here. You can get these for $1,600 and that's up to $200 too much for a non-illuminated scope in this class. I'm not sure it's price competitive... but it is viable enough if it is allowed in PRS production class (and similar).