Rifle Scopes Burris XTR3!!!

When’s the reticle usable in the 5-30?
How much more forgiving is the 5-30 to the 3-18 eye box?
Would you take two 3-18 or have one of both?
this one will be going on a bolt 223. No hunting will he used with it.

*The reticle is perfectly useable at 3.3x. I shot a bunch of whistle pigs yesterday from 20 to 50 yards. So I spent the entire time at the lowest magnification setting on my 18x scope which has the SCR2 reticle. The FOV is amazing. I was able to stay on glass scanning for everything.

I do think 5x looks a little better if you want to use the grid reticle for holdovers. But my .22 was zeroed for 50 so I was going dead at nearly everything. So long as you aren't hunting and encountering the dreaded/overhyped sunrise/sunset scenario, this reticle will treat you just fine.

*The eyebox is very good on both versions. Hard to pick a winner using equal magnification levels. Quite honestly, the XTR3 has a very user friendly eyebox. More forgiving than the MK5 or ATACR, most similar to the GenII Razor.

*I have one of both. I put the 18x on my .22 with a Race Dial. I think it will make an excellent compact, lightweight crossover optic. Strictly for targets I prefer the added horsepower of the 30x.
 
I can't decide if my dedicated prs scope should be RZR 2 or XTR III?

The answer is yes. LOL
The xtr3 has many features the RZR dont but the RZR is no slouch. Pick the one you like the retc better honestly...


What mount did you go with to include the red dot?

As mentioned its the Burris fastfire mount. Very easy to install and does what its supposed to. I have some friends who use it on their centerfire rig to find targets with it then look through scope.

jp223xtr3.jpg


GL
DT
 
I ordered two(I assume) black throw levers from Burris. There wasn’t an option for red. Not that I want red I’m just wondering if mine will be red or black now lol. The picture showed black
 
Does anyone know where I can get a good copy of the XTR III SCR2 MIL reticle? I need to enlarge and print to add some comments. The ones I've managed to grab (Burris site, etc) get blurry the bigger you make them. Also, they don't need to be huge, big enough for my data book.

Thanks
 
I recently ordered a 3.3-18x50 in scr mil for hunting, connot find anything on the reticle. There are prints and subtensions on the Burris site of scr moa for both 3.3-18x50 and 5.5-30x56 but nothing in mils. Idk if I can just take the moa value given and divide it by 3.6 to give the mil equivalent, and expect half mil hases in the vertical and 0.2 in horizontal or what. The have everything broke down on the xtr2 models in mil/moa. I've attached a few images I've been able to find, even that brochure has zero data on the xtr3 reticles other than the scr2.

You can find it under the XTRII details.

 
Has anyone here have an issue with scope going out of focus after firing the rifle? I have one on a 300 win mag that needs parallax reset after every firing. It gets all blurry. This is the second to do this at my local range. I shipped it back to burris yesterday. I hope this is resolved and doesn't happen again. I love everything about the scope. Everything but the out of focus issue.
 
@S3th I can understand that but I wouldn’t let that push you away. I have the XTR3 3-18x50 and it’s very impressive for the price point. I am sure Burris gets bombarded with the same question often and just can’t respond to everyone. I bet some of the “In the know Burris guys” on this forum, will provide updates when they get closer to pushing them into the wild. I have had good experiences with Burris in respect to their scope’s quality, ruggedness and servicing.
 
I would like this information too. I have reached out to Burris twice and they never reponsded. It is kinda pushing me away from purchasing one of their products.

No one really has an answer to this. The illumination, along with a thicker SCR2 reticle is under construction. It's being worked on by engineers in Greeley, and it goes without saying, they really want to get it right.

The driving factor behind a redesigned system is that they want to use something bulletproof.

Customer service personal aren't really in the engineering loop as far as product updates are concerned. That's a management/development team conversation. So at this point, no one outside of upper management knows where this is at.

@khuber84 kick me a PM with your address. I'll get you a properly anodized turret.
 
No one really has an answer to this. The illumination, along with a thicker SCR2 reticle is under construction. It's being worked on by engineers in Greeley, and it goes without saying, they really want to get it right.

The driving factor behind a redesigned system is that they want to use something bulletproof.

Customer service personal aren't really in the engineering loop as far as product updates are concerned. That's a management/development team conversation. So at this point, no one outside of upper management knows where this is at.

@khuber84 kick me a PM with your address. I'll get you a properly anodized turret.

All I am asking for is a response - it doesn't have to be a yes or no. Being ignored isn't great when you are considering a product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basher
Its a shame they didn't release these with illumination. The lack of illumination has killed the resale of these. I've got a 3.3-18 brand new in the box i can't even get rid of. The other 3.3-18 i shoot with is very impressive, such an awesome scope for 1500 bucks. Knowing how many people want illumination ( and usually still won't ever use it) it blows my mind Burris wouldn't have released this with illumination instead of making it an after thought

I’ve thought about saving for an XTRIII, but they cost as much as a Gen2 Razor, which is a proven platform with all the bells and whistles. I’ve kept my eyes on this since it was announced by D_Tros back in November of 2018. The fact that we’re a year and a half on from the announcement and Burris still doesn’t have an illuminated model is ridiculous. I realize they want to “get it right,” but come on! Are they inventing a new illumination method or something? And like you said, the lack of illumination is not only killing resale right now, but the non-illuminated models are likely gonna TANK on the used market once the illuminated version comes out...

I’d still like to try one, and really like the reticle, but I’m not buying until illumination comes out, and I may have already made my purchase in 9 months to a year when that finally happens, haha. And even then, the super low resale of non-illuminated models may have me getting a sweet deal on one of those instead! But I’ll keep my eyes peeled and see if I’m pleasantly surprised, I’ve enjoyed Burris products in the past but this one’s release has definitely been... interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_TROS and TrevK
The intent of the first release XTR3 has always been as a target/competition optic. Thus the lack of illumination and the thinner reticle.

From a first-hand perspective in the PRS , I love the thin reticle of the SCR2. It's perfectly suited for 10x to 30x magnification on targets in daylight. It is ideal for their intended usage.

The illuminated version was always intended as a follow up release once the competition version got off the ground. It's coming, it just wasnt the focus. The also wanted to get the RT6 Long Range scopes with the SCR2 out into the market place. So both of these products are out now.

I think the illumination and thicker reticle will be extremely well-received when it comes to market. It's going to be a great crossover optic.

I continually see on this forum and others that people like the XTR3 better than the G2 Razor, MK5HD, and NX8. Once illumination hits the market, this is going to be a pretty tough to beat option in the sub $2k price point.
 
The intent of the first release XTR3 has always been as a target/competition optic. Thus the lack of illumination and the thinner reticle.

From a first-hand perspective in the PRS , I love the thin reticle of the SCR2. It's perfectly suited for 10x to 30x magnification on targets in daylight. It is ideal for their intended usage.

The illuminated version was always intended as a follow up release once the competition version got off the ground. It's coming, it just wasnt the focus. The also wanted to get the RT6 Long Range scopes with the SCR2 out into the market place. So both of these products are out now.

I think the illumination and thicker reticle will be extremely well-received when it comes to market. It's going to be a great crossover optic.

I continually see on this forum and others that people like the XTR3 better than the G2 Razor, MK5HD, and NX8. Once illumination hits the market, this is going to be a pretty tough to beat option in the sub $2k price point.

Do you know where they're made? Is this Japanese glass or the Philippines glass of the XTR II?
 
I don’t actually need illumination but if the illuminated version comes with a thicker reticle, then that corrects my biggest issue with the scope. I hate how reticles have been getting thinner and thinner. .05 mil line thickness needs to come back.

I agree, maybe on the higher magnification version the thin reticle will be ok, but the 3-18 will benefit from a thicker reticle IMO.

I have a PST 3-15 with the EBR-7c and feel that the reticle is to fine throughout the entire mag range.
If I'm proven wrong at least the used market will be flooded with dirt cheap non-illuminated versions, apparently...
 
Has anyone had any problems with reticle jump on these scopes? Took it to the range today and had a wandering zero problem. After messing with it for a while I noticed the reticle jumps .3 to .5 mil (not precise, to the best I can tell) when raising or lowering the magnification. I sent Burris a email when I got home (aware they are closed on the weekend) but was wondering if this was a known issue that I may have missed while researching. Just a little disappointed after spending this amount of money and having problems out of the gate. Oh well we'll see how it pans out I guess.
 
Last edited:
Yes, Burris has a comprehensive “No Questions Asked” warranty.

....and by that, they mean that you send the scope back to them, they sit on it for 3-6 weeks, don’t contact you, and then return the scope back to you saying they didn’t find anything wrong with it...without asking you any questions.

Hence, “No Questions Asked” warranty.
 
Has anyone had any problems with reticle jump on these scopes? Took it to the range today and had a wandering zero problem. After messing with it for a while I noticed the reticle jumps .3 to .5 mil (not precise, to the best I can tell) when raising or lowering the magnification. I sent Burris a email when I got home (aware they are closed on the weekend) but was wondering if this was a known issue that I may have missed while researching. Just a little disappointed after spending this amount of money and having problems out of the gate. Oh well we'll see how it pans out I guess.

Your not alone. Not me but found someone with the same problem on a different forum. Last post.
"Just an update.......I REALLY liked everything about this scope, unfortunately already had to return it to Burris. Reticle was moving when indexing the power ring between +-. Scope was on a 7.8# braked 300 norma improved. I suspect the high recoil pulse and brake affect jarred something loose internally.
Bummer.......I'll probably be selling after it's repaired, maybe I'll try it on a lighter recoil setup."

 
I'm working with sport optics to fix the issue, which they don't have to do, they could push me off on Burris. I'm not sure yet if I'm going to just get a replacement from them or a credit and get something else. It would be different if it broke after I've had it for a while but I'm not sure I would ever completely trust another one with this in the back of my head.

Sportoptics has been great through all this, I can't recommend them enough so far.
 
I wonder if birdog knows about this issue, he pushes burris hard. Thanks for the feedback above I'll stay away from burris.

Khuber's optic is the only one I'm aware of having this issue.

I'm aware of two other scopes being returned. All were handled in a timely manner and the return issue was resolved. I cant say Burris scopes are perfect. No one can say that about any manufacturer. Give them an opportunity to make it right and go from there. It's still a great scope. The good news on these optics far outweigh the bad.
 
Last edited:
Khuber's optic is the only one I'm aware of having this issue.

I'm aware of two other scopes being returned. All were handled in a timely manner and the return issue was resolved. I cant say Burris scopes are perfect. No one can say that about any manufacturer. Give them an opportunity to make it right and go from there. It's still a great scope. The good news on these optics far outweigh the bad.

Honest Question: you do a better job of repping Burris, supporting their product and communicating with customers than their actual service department; why haven’t they hired you to unfuck their situation?
 
What type of rifle did you have it on? My 338 rum killed an ares etr in short order as well. It now wears a leupold mk5hd. I purchased another xtr3 3.3-18x50 here a lil while back, no issues with that one, nor the replacement Burris sent me.

It was on my match rifle and the funny thing is it has my 223 barrel on it now, it weighs 16lbs. I'm waiting on 2 new 6mm Creed barrels to be delivered. So definitely not some hard recoiling rifle. Pretty sure this scope was like this out of the box, and I missed the issue when mounting it.
 
Honest Question: you do a better job of repping Burris, supporting their product and communicating with customers than their actual service department; why haven’t they hired you to unfuck their situation?

Haha, I do wish I had a little more pull with them to make things happen for you guys. I contact them every now and then and pull strings for the guys here on the Hide, but I wish I could do more.

I'm just a shooter though. I feel pretty privileged to have been on the Burris shooting team for the last five years. They treat me fantastic, they are great people trying their best to continue to bring a good product to everyone.

A few glitches on a new scope release doesnt really worry me, though I feel bad for the guys who are the recipient of a scope that needs to be returned. I remember when the XTRII came to market. It was plagued with issues, and it ended up being a very successful, extremely durable optic.

I have faith that Burris will unfuck themselves ;)


It was on my match rifle and the funny thing is it has my 223 barrel on it now, it weighs 16lbs. I'm waiting on 2 new 6mm Creed barrels to be delivered. So definitely not some hard recoiling rifle. Pretty sure this scope was like this out of the box, and I missed the issue when mounting it.

As mentioned above, Khuber went through this issue. I contacted the people I know on his behalf and they told me what the problem was. It was complicated, and I quite honestly dont understand scope engineering well enough to understand what they were telling me. That's why Khuber mentioned he thought it was a BS answer. I dont believe they were BSing us personally. If the reticle was broken or jumping, they simply could have said so. No big deal. The guy I spoke to about it wouldnt have any reason to make anything up. But long story short, you got a malfunctioning scope right out of the box, which sucks, and I feel badly for you.

Best option is just reach out to them and give them the opportunity to take care of it. It's still an excellent optic at a great price. Once they get you taken care of you'll be happy you picked it.

And dont worry about putting it on a heavy recoiling rifle. I've run two different XTR3s on a 300 Norma Mag and a 338 Lapua Mag.

As soon as I can get out of work today I'm headed out with a buddy and slapping one on a 50BMG. We have several rifles today that we are going to start at 1200 yards, and work our way out to 2200 yards.

If you run into any issues with Burris, shoot me a PM. I'll make a call for you.
 
Like I've said before I can't recommend sportoptics enough and Jayce there has been great to deal with. Since the scope is so new they are taking care of it. I decided to get another one. I really like the scope overall, the glass, FOV, and reticle are great. Seems like overall the scope gets great reviews. Im optimistic it will be ok.
 
Question. The PRS Production class rule states ' The optic shall not exceed $2,000 USD as listed on the company’s website.'

If I go to Burris' website right now, it lists the SCR2 MIL for $1,941. Obviously you can get it cheaper. But it also lists the MSRP for the same at $2,219.

Does this scope qualify for PRS Production Class? If not... huge mistake in the MSRP pricing.

I'd have one of these on order - since I like my Burris Fulfield II scopes on the hunting rifles - but this is a tactical scope with less features than scopes half the price. I realize the glass and FOV and all of that are probably wonderful, but we have to be realistic here. You can get these for $1,600 and that's up to $200 too much for a non-illuminated scope in this class. I'm not sure it's price competitive... but it is viable enough if it is allowed in PRS production class (and similar).
 
Question. The PRS Production class rule states ' The optic shall not exceed $2,000 USD as listed on the company’s website.'

If I go to Burris' website right now, it lists the SCR2 MIL for $1,941. Obviously you can get it cheaper. But it also lists the MSRP for the same at $2,219.

Does this scope qualify for PRS Production Class? If not... huge mistake in the MSRP pricing.

I'd have one of these on order - since I like my Burris Fulfield II scopes on the hunting rifles - but this is a tactical scope with less features than scopes half the price. I realize the glass and FOV and all of that are probably wonderful, but we have to be realistic here. You can get these for $1,600 and that's up to $200 too much for a non-illuminated scope in this class. I'm not sure it's price competitive... but it is viable enough if it is allowed in PRS production class (and similar).

Yeah. Huge mistake. They'll miss out on the chance to sell to all 3 guys who are going to shoot production. Haha