Rifle Scopes Burris XTR3!!!

Just ordered a 3-18 SCR Mil, should be here next week. I'm excited to see how it stacks up against my ATACR.

Would like to hear your comparison once you’ve had it out to the range. I’ve been considering an atacr 4-16 as an alternative to the perpetually delayed xtriii w/ illumination. Fortunately the rifle isn’t finished yet so I still have some time to wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RFutch and Basher
Thanks, I looked there. It's still nearly a $100 difference.

I'm not coming back from Korea for a couple months. I'm willing to wait a bit to see if it comes back in stock.
Except it isn't. Expert voice charges taxes, fees, and their shipping is higher than normal. Most of the online retailers don't. Difference is a lot less than you think.
 
Got mine today and it’s nice. Except for the little razor blades on the mag ring. This thing seriously needs a throw lever, my poor office hands can’t deal with how sharp the dragon scales are.
D12EBA27-DB7A-430E-8990-CBDB716225DE.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Would like to hear your comparison once you’ve had it out to the range. I’ve been considering an atacr 4-16 as an alternative to the perpetually delayed xtriii w/ illumination. Fortunately the rifle isn’t finished yet so I still have some time to wait.
Ok I am in no way a professional optic guru but here are my thoughts. I’ve been out twice with it, once a rainy foggy day and then today which was bright and sunny. I compared it to both my 5-25 ATACR and my 3.5-15 NXS out to 1000 yards. The Burris falls in between as expected, but to my eyes it’s closer to the NXS than the ATACR. Specifically CA was controlled a lot better in the Burris than the NXS and resolution was also better. Color looked the same to me but FOV was better in the Burris.
The ATACR does look better to me but it’s also twice the cost. Overall I am very happy with the XTRIII though and the windage marks on the SCR are very similar to the MIL-C which pretty cool.
85958329-1EF4-4972-A430-8068334B18D7.jpeg
 
I bought a 2nd one this week, as opposed to a 2nd ZCO, or a March wide angle. Best value IMHO, and some uniqueness with thin ret and big FOV. I have a 4K yard view from the front of my house, and try as I might over the last ~year, I have not been able to come up with a scenario where I could see something with my ZCO that I couldn't see with my XTR3. ZCO is definitely better, can see detail at long range that can't be discerned with the Burris, but for me, no real practical difference in taking a shot.
 
I bought a 2nd one this week, as opposed to a 2nd ZCO, or a March wide angle. Best value IMHO, and some uniqueness with thin ret and big FOV. I have a 4K yard view from the front of my house, and try as I might over the last ~year, I have not been able to come up with a scenario where I could see something with my ZCO that I couldn't see with my XTR3. ZCO is definitely better, can see detail at long range that can't be discerned with the Burris, but for me, no real practical difference in taking a shot.

Heresy I say!
 
Ok I am in no way a professional optic guru but here are my thoughts. I’ve been out twice with it, once a rainy foggy day and then today which was bright and sunny. I compared it to both my 5-25 ATACR and my 3.5-15 NXS out to 1000 yards. The Burris falls in between as expected, but to my eyes it’s closer to the NXS than the ATACR. Specifically CA was controlled a lot better in the Burris than the NXS and resolution was also better. Color looked the same to me but FOV was better in the Burris.
The ATACR does look better to me but it’s also twice the cost. Overall I am very happy with the XTRIII though and the windage marks on the SCR are very similar to the MIL-C which pretty cool.
Thanks for the follow up, I appreciate the comparison
 
  • Like
Reactions: RFutch
Received my 2nd XTR3 today - just as nice as the first one, looked at both back and forth compared to a ZCO and Trijicon Tenmile for comparison. Everything I've written in the past applies to this one as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_TROS
Its amazing to me that this optic still isn't consistently in the conversation when the "usual suspects" come up (the MK5, Razor, Cronus, any LOW scope, etc)

In the last two years of constant comparisons, I've yet to see any of those scopes that were nicer than the pair of XTR3s that I always have at the range. But I've seen the Burris outshine quite a few of those.

And there is some cool stuff on the horizon for this optic!!
I think a lot of it is because Burris is the only manufacturer that does NOT offer illuminated options on their highest line of scopes. That’s an immediate deal killer for most people looking at optics between brands.
 
I think a lot of it is because Burris is the only manufacturer that does NOT offer illuminated options on their highest line of scopes. That’s an immediate deal killer for most people looking at optics between brands.
I was guessing this might be the cool stuff on the horizon mentioned. I'll have to try using it one of these days to see if it is as big a deal to me as a lot of shooters say it is to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basher
Believe me, I wish I could.

I'm chomping at the bit to expound on that. But not yet.

The good news though is its super close. It won't be a very long wait to see what's coming.

After I just bought a 2nd one! You will need to pull some strings and allow me to upgrade for the price difference! If it's just illumination and the bit thicker reticle, I'll pass, but a higher end XTR4, I'm in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Birddog6424
Its amazing to me that this optic still isn't consistently in the conversation when the "usual suspects" come up (the MK5, Razor, Cronus, any LOW scope, etc)

In the last two years of constant comparisons, I've yet to see any of those scopes that were nicer than the pair of XTR3s that I always have at the range. But I've seen the Burris outshine quite a few of those.

And there is some cool stuff on the horizon for this optic!!

That will probably change when the illuminated models make it here and the cool stuff you are alluding to. I am pretty excited about that one. So much so, that I left a time slot for reviewing it (generally, I am no longer accepting new review items until I clear some of my backlog).

ILya
 
Been waiting patiently for the illuminated version of the 3-18. Still waiting on the barrel for the rifle it’s going on so I haven’t been to antsy but I’ve started to wonder if it’ll ever come out.

Excited to hear the news, hopefully this can be my Christmas present to myself
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chasing3
Here's hoping "more than just illuminated" means it went on a diet. If Vortex can make a 22oz 4.5-22, maybe Burris can make a 3.3-18 that comes in under the Tenmile's 3-18's 25oz. Pepperidge Farms remembers the original sub 27oz hype, as unintentional as that was.
 
I can end the suspense on this one. That's not their market on this scope.

This is part of the Tactical/Competition scope line up from Burris. Though I'll tell you honestly, the weight of the 30x XTR3 lineup is pretty competitive with its peers. The Delta Stryker, Tract Toric, Cronus and Razor are all heavier. The 18x Mk5 and XTR3 are within an ounce of each other.

It's just not the focus of the optic.

My big game rifle, gear,, boots,, clothing weighs 25 to 35lbs, depending on the time of year. An extra 5 or 6 ounces to get the optic i want isn't even on my radar.
Okay, so the cool stuff is not just illumination and it's not reduced weight, that's good, now you've got my attention.
 
Its amazing to me that this optic still isn't consistently in the conversation when the "usual suspects" come up (the MK5, Razor, Cronus, any LOW scope, etc)

In the last two years of constant comparisons, I've yet to see any of those scopes that were nicer than the pair of XTR3s that I always have at the range. But I've seen the Burris outshine quite a few of those.

And there is some cool stuff on the horizon for this optic!!
@Birddog, this isn't directed at you personally, so bear that in mind.

I'd love to think there is cool stuff on the horizon; but for too long "illumination is coming" has been heard (at least implied from my reading). I really want to like this offering; but the constant tease is a little old. Now the tease is more cool stuff for this optic (or is it actually a XTR IV now?) and since this is around the time I'm looking to purchase something again (>75% chance) it would be in my consideration for sure. However, the tease of illumination for a long time has dulled my desire. Since it's taken this long for illumination to (I guess) finally be here, how long is it going to take for the cool stuff and the actual inventory to arrive?

I'm sure it's a great scope; but since I refuse to pay that kind of money and not be at least offered illumination I've waited...and...waited. But just wait a bit more. It's starting to wonder if Burris is run by the GOP - just be patient, we'll work it out.

The improved model isn't out of the running, but soon it will be.
 
@Birddog, this isn't directed at you personally, so bear that in mind.

I'd love to think there is cool stuff on the horizon; but for too long "illumination is coming" has been heard (at least implied from my reading). I really want to like this offering; but the constant tease is a little old. Now the tease is more cool stuff for this optic (or is it actually a XTR IV now?) and since this is around the time I'm looking to purchase something again (>75% chance) it would be in my consideration for sure. However, the tease of illumination for a long time has dulled my desire. Since it's taken this long for illumination to (I guess) finally be here, how long is it going to take for the cool stuff and the actual inventory to arrive?

I'm sure it's a great scope; but since I refuse to pay that kind of money and not be at least offered illumination I've waited...and...waited. But just wait a bit more. It's starting to wonder if Burris is run by the GOP - just be patient, we'll work it out.

The improved model isn't out of the running, but soon it will be.


I always laugh at the lack of illum being a deter. I have used illum 3x in the last 20 years...both times were at night exercises/matches which Im almost sure 100% of the shooters on the hide dont do. Ive hunted on 3 continents and killed countless elk/deer and also nvr once used illum hunting. That includes early/late as the scope always seems to be brighter than naked eye anyway. Of course there are always bad eyes to consider which illum would help. so there is that!

That being said, I am as annoyed at the lack of release of illum as well. Id way rather no announcement was made. But Burris was soooooo close to releasing it last yr. Esp when I have seen prototypes ready to go. The reason for not being released will be made clear soon. To say it bluntly, there are major manufacturing changes that completely stopped illum production. And I for one am glad it happened.


I called everyone I could yesterday and was told the target announcement is this Turkey day. So hold your horses. lol.


Regards
DT
 
Last edited:
I always laugh at the lack of illum being a deter. I have used illum 3x in the last 20 years...both times were at night exercises/matches which Im almost sure 100% of the shooters on the hide dont do. Ive hunted on 3 continents and killed countless elk/deer and also nvr once used illum hunting. That includes early/late as the scope always seems to be brighter than naked eye anyway. Of course there are always bad eyes to consider which illum would help. so there is that!

That being said, I am as annoyed at the lack of release of illum as well. Id way rather no announcement was made. But Burris was soooooo close to releasing it last yr. Esp when I have seen prototypes ready to go. The reason for not being released will be made clear soon. To say it bluntly, there are major manufacturing changes that completely stopped illum production. And I for one am glad it happened.


I called everyone I could yesterday and was told the target announcement is this Turkey day. So hold your horses. lol.


Regards
DT
LOL. Thanks for the "Gobble" information.

I'm not saying I use illum a lot, shit, I'm not nearly as accomplished as 95% of you guys; but I know where I regularly shoot, at sunset (when sun gets into eyes and backdrop is dark as heck - not to mention the range usually paints targets dark (until I paint...LOL) ) it's very nice to have. And...if I'm farting off 1500+ I think that should be a discriminator.

I have no doubt it's a quality scope. I remember right when my father got ill these were announced along with the new reticle on the ATACR. So it's been a while coming. Hopefully slow and sure win here and an awesome scope is to be had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_TROS
Completely understand your sentiments brother. And a lot of us are in agreement with you.

As Dorgan pointed put, the illumination release has been on again off again. Prototypes for the original release came out a long time ago, but lots of factors contributed to its delay. So we weren't deliberately misleading anyone, and we have shared your frustration.

Burris has kicked this back to the drawing board to make it something worth the wait. Only the customer can truly say if that will be the case or not, but for my part, I think this is looking like a fantastic optic. Itll have some features no other optic in the industry has, or is very rare.

Appreciate you hanging in there with us. I hope you continue to ride it out and wait for its release. I think you'll be happy you did.
Thanks for the honesty from the information you have and are permitted to disclose - as always appreciated. For me, the choices come down to about 4 companies: Burris, Bushnell, Vortex, and Minox. Sorry, no TT or ZCO in my future unless I by chance win lotto.

I have a few Bushy's (LRTS both 3-12 and 4.5-18). The 3-12 I got from CameralandNY that has illumination is frankly one of my favorites. Kick myself for not buying 2-3 (instead I got the non-illum since they were on blowout pricing 2 years ago). However, they all have the GAP tree which whilst not bad, there is room for improvement that I don't really see too much in their new scopes they just released (not to mention no illum). I tend to dial up on those more than I do the Minox.

The Vortex Gen III (prepping to go right now and use it at range), seems great until 8-9x and then it, to me, gets very hard to get behind and the glass gets darker and darker. But, I guess we cannot have it all on an LVPO. So I'm really not sold on Vortex as a whole - but that's my issue.

Love the Minox, except for the return trip taking 4 months!!!

So I guess what I'm saying...Burris has a very good chance to get some business from me. Just don't keep me hanging much past January to make that choice. :) :).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Birddog6424
Haha, I'm not sure if the new one will be something everyone thinks they must have. I suspect there will be some price difference between the Comp version and the illuminated. And some folks who aren't illumination fans may no want to pay that difference. The changes made are very cool. But with all things there will be some who love it and some who don't think they need it.
Hey Birddog can you confirm if the XTRIII glass is sourced from LOW? I've searched all around and I saw that the XTRII was LOW but didn't see a definitive answer if the XTRIII was LOW or somewhere else. Also are the internals made in house in CO? or are they sourced from Asia. Thanks, I'm excited for news of the illuminated version coming soon.
 
Hey Birddog can you confirm if the XTRIII glass is sourced from LOW? I've searched all around and I saw that the XTRII was LOW but didn't see a definitive answer if the XTRIII was LOW or somewhere else. Also are the internals made in house in CO? or are they sourced from Asia. Thanks, I'm excited for news of the illuminated version coming soon.
The XTR2s were made in the Philippines except for the 1-8 LVPO (that I think was discontinued)
 
*snip*

The glass is sourced from Japan and the reticles are etched by a new state of the art laser acquired specifically for the new reticles in Greeley. The entirety of the rest of the XTR3 is designed, engineered, manufactured, and assembled in Greeley Colorado.

Thanks for the info. Looking forward to the announcement on the new SKUs. Any idea when the new scopes will ship out to dealers?
 
Interesting reading the input on the XRT III. I bought a XTR II, last year, at a great price, for a project. The problem is, the scope, optically, is terrible. I compared it to my Bushnell Elite Tactical, which I bought about the same time (for a different project) and its not even close. I took the XTR II back to the range, as I had to give it another chance, but....I took it back off and put the Elite back on. I'm in the market for another scope and while the XTR III is getting great reviews here, I'm very leery about buying one. Did I just get a bad one, or were the II's hit and miss?
 
Interesting reading the input on the XRT III. I bought a XTR II, last year, at a great price, for a project. The problem is, the scope, optically, is terrible. I compared it to my Bushnell Elite Tactical, which I bought about the same time (for a different project) and its not even close. I took the XTR II back to the range, as I had to give it another chance, but....I took it back off and put the Elite back on. I'm in the market for another scope and while the XTR III is getting great reviews here, I'm very leery about buying one. Did I just get a bad one, or were the II's hit and miss?
To which Bushnell are you making the comparison? There are several scopes in the Bushnell Elite Tactical line.
 
It's a first gen Elite Tactical, not XRS/DMR/etc. I bought it for my RPR rimfire and its a great scope, considering what I paid for it. I compared it to a Leupold MK 5 HD, and while the Mk 5 was a better scope, the Elite cost me $1500 LESS! I ordered a Razor HD II, via a 'hide vendor, but haven't received it yet. I'm hoping it meets my expectation.
 
Interesting reading the input on the XRT III. I bought a XTR II, last year, at a great price, for a project. The problem is, the scope, optically, is terrible. I compared it to my Bushnell Elite Tactical, which I bought about the same time (for a different project) and its not even close. I took the XTR II back to the range, as I had to give it another chance, but....I took it back off and put the Elite back on. I'm in the market for another scope and while the XTR III is getting great reviews here, I'm very leery about buying one. Did I just get a bad one, or were the II's hit and miss?

The 2's were known for being poor optically. The 3 is top of the food chain before going Alpha, and the best value in the marketplace at 1.5K IMHO.
 
The 2's were known for being poor optically. The 3 is top of the food chain before going Alpha, and the best value in the marketplace at 1.5K IMHO.
I keep seeing these complaints about the XTR2 optical quality, but they don't match my experiences. The XTR2 and Veracity scopes I have/had were optically as good as anything near the 1k mark. Grantee, I understand some running changes were made to the XTR2 line and mine were fairly recent productions.

I put the XTR2 right in line with Bushy LRTS and Sightron S3 in average image quality; where each has slightly different strengths and weaknesses. I also put them a quarter step down from the XRS2, and a half step behind the Cronus BTR and XTR3.

The XTR3 also has some trade-offs. I haven't seen it mentioned, but mine does a poor job handling stray light/flare (w/o the sunshade); under conditions where a (no sunshade equiped) Cronus BTR had no issues.