-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Can We Avoid War?
- Thread starter 1911addict42
- Start date
Says the guy doing the tattling
Same comprehension skills as always.
So, what's your favorite crayon flavor ?
Last edited:
Settle down Francis. If you’ve read posts on this sight for any amount of time and expected a response other than the one you got....... you might need to lay-off the lead paint chips
Well then, I guess that makes you the pivot man on the circle jerk.
What’s it feel like being the center of the universe ? I wouldn’t know. I’ve never cared enough to think that way.
As long as they want to destroy Demwit controlled cities, I say let them have at it. The minute they think they can go into ALL communities is the day they'll see this war you speak of.
I wonder about the pretense of that video. They fail to realize that the BLM movement is controlled by Blacks, but many, if not most, of it's foot soldiers are WHITE. Do they think that all of a sudden, those whites in the BLM movement will be targeted by their fellow rioters?
I think it's much more complicated than whites vs black.
I think it's starting as a class war, but mainly in the cities under the guise a race war. There are white and black poor folks in the rural areas and they know they're poor. They don't differentiate by race (there are exceptions of course). Those who feel oppressed will be the ones in the street.
I think there will be skirmishes all over the country. An all out war, I can't see how that could happen (in it's literal sense) but you can call it what you will.
I think it's much more complicated than whites vs black.
I think it's starting as a class war, but mainly in the cities under the guise a race war. There are white and black poor folks in the rural areas and they know they're poor. They don't differentiate by race (there are exceptions of course). Those who feel oppressed will be the ones in the street.
I think there will be skirmishes all over the country. An all out war, I can't see how that could happen (in it's literal sense) but you can call it what you will.
"Articles of Unity" he's calling it. A lot of respect for Bret. He, his wife, and his brother Eric very smart people. And they are trying at least...
But.
In conversation with a friend whom is pretty good with history... since his reply seemed fairly astute, for what it's worth I'll add it here....
"All 'united' governments fail quite quickly. Look at what happened to the coupled Leaders in the 1970's in the USSR. Kosygin was supposed to be an equal power with Bresznev. Just how long did THAT last? The "strongman" will push his weaker brother out of the nest, just like in avian society. Another "modified" experiment in the theory is actually going on right now. Since none of the various political parties in Israel could form a 50% supported government in four separate attempts in the past year, the two strongest decided that one would rule for a year, and then the other for the next year. But of course the creepy (and presently ensconced Nethanyahu) insisted on the first year. Let's follow the proceedings when it comes time for this ***head to give up the throne. If he isn't convicted of the corruption crimes, and trial he is about to face, it will be something to watch next year."
Rule #1, when you're in power, never give it up willingly.
first off, BLM is not run or controlled by black folks, but it would be politically incorrect for me to suggest who is.
it isn't about white vs black, but about people that are neither trying to make it this way.
It's the same tactics that have been used for ever- devide and concur:
sorry. that term means something to some people.
who runs the democrat party?
soros, sanders, schumer, schiff, feinstein, nadler, blumenthal, wasserman-schultz...
they control congress, banking, virtually all major media outlets, hollywood, amazon....
pretty good for 2% of the population.
It's telling that you leave out their top leadership, like Pelosi and Perez, but include someone as irrelevant as Wasserman Schultz.
88 much?
wasserman-schultz was the chair of the dnc.
you can see that pelosi and perez are evil just by looking at them, they don't need to be pointed out. they only pretend to be religious.
Most illegal immigrant crime, especially rape, is unreported because the criminals target innocent immigrants that are afraid of contact with the police.
Protecting illegal immigrant criminal entry hurts the folks democrats pretend to care about.
STUDY: Fearing Deportation, Latinos Don’t Report Crimes
thinkprogress.org
what is 88?
btw, i am not a white nationalist, or even white.
The shorter list is, like 0%, who in the Dem. Party isn't a swamp creature.
Last edited:
wasserman-schultz was the chair of the dnc.
you can see that pelosi and perez are evil just by looking at them, they don't need to be pointed out. they only pretend to be religious.
Most illegal immigrant crime, especially rape, is unreported because the criminals target innocent immigrants that are afraid of contact with the police.
Protecting illegal immigrant criminal entry hurts the folks democrats pretend to care about.
STUDY: Fearing Deportation, Latinos Don’t Report Crimes
what is 88?
btw, i am not a white nationalist, or even white.
I'm pretty sure that everyone on your list is Jewish. If not deliberate, it's quite a big coincidence.
H is the eighth letter in the alphabet.
I see nothing wrong with being a White nationalist btw, as in a person wants to protect the rights of people of European descent, as long they're not they're not racist, as in wanting to send black folks back to Africa. Just about every ethnicity in this country has special interest groups. Why should only one be excluded?
The democrats are not evil, but they're in the process of getting taken over by leftists who are. We may end up having to forge a coalition of liberals and conservatives to fight these leftists off. Keep that in mind when choosing your enemies.
Neonazis are leftists in my book. If they ever take over, they'll rule with fascist socialism.
i think antifa is the left's version of neonazis.
look what they did in russia. that slaughter is never discussed, or rarely, and if it is, there soon follows accusations of anti-semitism.
while i am not white, i believe the great replacement is a real thing, and will hurt everyone of every color and creed.
migration doesn't solve problems, it spreads them.
Accusations against which? The ones who say the Russians purged people for being Jewish? Or against the Russians who did in fact purge people for being Jewish?
avoiding a war would be much easier than avoiding donating money to support socialist programs a lot of the companies that do are easy to find while others are starting to hiding the facts they donate money to fund terrorism in the united states sports organization like the nfl , mlb , and nba all removed there once proud sponger page for the blm I am betting they are still giving them money as well the blm also took down there which pro socialist democratic candidate they sponcer page as did the group they give money to to donate money to the dnc through act blue who knew adding the information to an easily seen web page was not the smartest idea . Also proudly showing the amounts and which donor gave how much was not a great idea either . cable companies and companies that supply food and other goods are going to be harder to avoid there are only 4 cable companies across the United states so if you stop paying them what other choices are there basic cable lol yea right .
Oh that. Well, who cares about that? They probably deserved it for not being communist enough and for oppressing Russian Muslims and black people.
(That's meant to be sopping wet with sarcasm, btw. Although AFAIC it doesn't matter if the Bolsheviks slaughtered millions of Christians, and it doesn't matter how many of the Bolsheviks were ethnically/religiously/culturally Jewish, either; what matters is they slaughtered millions of people to begin with and it's not antisemitic to say so. Just as it's not antisemitic to say that there were Jews in Hitler's SS who betrayed their own families to their fellow Nazis in exchange for being declared never-Jewish-to-begin-with by Hitler himself.)
right, just saying...antifa and the bolsheviks are very similar, and antifa is already burning bibles.
democrat politicians will let you loot and riot, but will arrest you if you dare go to church.
they removed "under god" from their socialist version of the pledge of allegiance.
christians are under attack like no other religion. and i am not religious, although i was raised catholic.
"It doesn't take a charter member of mensa to see where this is leading."
Or a brick to fall on your head.
the main problem is that these realities are not being presented or explained in a clear manner to 60% of the public, or anyone that limits their news sources to the main stream outlets. even foxnews during the daytime is an endless stream of liberal contributors or staff and virtually no challenges to the lies they tell over and over.
I getcha.right, just saying...antifa and the bolsheviks are very similar, and antifa is already burning bibles.
democrat politicians will let you loot and riot, but will arrest you if you dare go to church.
they removed "under god" from their socialist version of the pledge of allegiance.
christians are under attack like no other religion. and i am not religious, although i was raised catholic.
?
Please excuse my ignorance. Not sure if you're agreeing with my position or not. If not, please educate me. My ego is not so great that I can't learn something factual.Exactly. The media reports on what they want to report. I don't know how people feel about Fox News but at least for the most part looks like they try to report what is happening. I just don't put much into the media anymore. Hard to believe without seeing. Videos usually do that. I don't social media except for snipershide. This is my social media. Please excuse my rambling.
I am agreeing with you.?
Growing up from what I remember about the Democrats and the Republicans, the Democrats always stood up for the rights of the people. Today and for several years past it seems to have turned around that the Republicans seem to stand for the people and the Democrats have fallen so far away from the people that they only care about themselves and not the people. Any older farts like me may remember this.
Growing up and in my younger years I cared less about the news and more about shooting, hunting, and fishing. I still love to shoot, hunt and fish but worry more about my children and grandchildren growing up in this crap. I can take care of myself but they are out on their own. I have taught them but they are not grounded like I am.
Fox has been listing left since the old man turned it over to his sons. Both of his boys are married to liberal cunts, one of which actually worked on hillary's campaign, if that tells you anything. Guess they've decided to be a small fish in a big pond. I haven't watched them for a while now, for just the kind of shit you're talking about.
I know. Sometimes I get so depressed I just watch Tom and Jerry. Get more out of that than I do the news. Not really depressed just fed up with letting the idiots riot and tear up the Country.
I know what you mean. I have a little one, and I take every chance to teach all that I can. Start them off right, and those lessons are likely to stick with them. I'm afraid the millennials and gen z are pretty much a lost cause. They've had their heads pumped full of this left-wing shit for way too long. They'll have to learn the hard way.
Yes they will. I came up through the school of hard knocks. Working for every penny.
Similar threads
