Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeI bought a brand new 700 in 22-250 w/heavy fluted barrel about 6 years ago, shot better groups with my model 12. So I had re-crowned, then bought a B&C stock, the had trigger reworked, the had another smith re-crown then figured out lands were and inch from bullet when try to figure out seating depth and the barrel was garbage- getting new barrel and started buying old winchesters. So sad, I bought a 700 in 300 win mag 22 years ago and before barrel seasoned was getting 1/4” groups at 100 yardsOkay, the obvious answer is operator error and normally I'd agree, but in this case I think it's the scope. What do you think?
My buddy has a Remington 700 in 300 WM. He had a POS scope on it and we were able to zero it and get a decent group. Shot that way for about a year. He had a gunsmith mount a new scope while he installed a pretty beefy muzzle brake (not sure which brand). The scope is a Viper PST G2 5-25. We both shoot RPRs, his in 6.5 CM with a Razor 4.5-27 and mine in 308 with Viper PST G2 5-25 and can get sub MOA groups at 100 yds. Neither one of us can get the win mag to hold a group. We can barely keep it on a sheet of paper. We're shooting prone, on the ground, with a bipod and a rear bag at 100 yds. With the brake on it, there's not much more recoil than on my 308, and I can maintain sight picture through recoil to see impacts. I suggested to him that he put the POS scope back on it and we try again this afternoon. If we can hold a group, it would definitely point to the scope in some way, if it can't , it could be the muzzle brake. I've checked everything I can think of except the torque on the rings. Figured the gunsmith should get that right... I don't know what else to try. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Mike.
To let everyone know, we are using Remington factory loads. And have been using the same ammo since we started shooting the rifle. Saturday is looking good for range time...
What about the rail?While the thread has seemingly run astray from the accuracy problem... To get back to the original issue. The short answer is spread through several posts. The rifle has been removed from stock, scope and bases have been removed and a brake installed.
You start with this by eliminating the variables.
Strip to bare barrel , check bedding reinstall and tighten action screws to spec. Check barrel channel ( the old dollar bill between barrel and stock.) Reinstall bases substitute a known scope. Remove brake.
Shoot . install brake . shoot. Put original scope back on . shoot.
It's not a major ordeal.
That definately sounds like a major ordeal to me.While the thread has seemingly run astray from the accuracy problem... To get back to the original issue. The short answer is spread through several posts. The rifle has been removed from stock, scope and bases have been removed and a brake installed.
You start with this by eliminating the variables.
Strip to bare barrel , check bedding reinstall and tighten action screws to spec. Check barrel channel ( the old dollar bill between barrel and stock.) Reinstall bases substitute a known scope. Remove brake.
Shoot . install brake . shoot. Put original scope back on . shoot.
It's not a major ordeal.
Nah, just measure things in beers.That definately sounds like a major ordeal to me.
yes, factory barrel with less than 200 rounds through it.Factory barrel?
I wonder if it had a ton of stress and when cut for the brake it relieved itself and went wonky?
Gauge pin the muzzle to see if it opened up after cutting it.yes, factory barrel with less than 200 rounds through it.
Gauge pin the muzzle to see if it opened up after cutting it.
Another possibility for sure.Or maybe they cut the threads non concentric to the bore?
Yeah that's an indicator.When I had supressor troubles, the guy who threaded my barrel did a runout test on both the brake and the suppressor. It was eye opening. The brake had very little runout, but the supressor was pretty bad (we could see it visually). The whole think behaved very similarly to what you are saying--throwing bullets all over the place--but there was no obvious baffle strike. Even a glancing blow is enough to throw things way off target.
I may be calling it the wrong thing, but it was a gauge with a needle--we mounted barrel in a lather and slowly rotated the barrel. any imperfections in the concentrically were measured in the thousandths of an inch. If there is a bad mount--I bet that would show it (assuming the brake has a cylindrical portion.
Silver sharpie on my black rifles, or some other high-contrast color. Orange, bright blue paint pens too.How do you guys do your witness marks???
900⁰ silver solder paste and MAP torch while optic is mounted.Stop being a pussy and tig the screws to the mount.
That's what real men do.
While that is likely the case--don't assume--check everything. Obviously its easy to pull the brake off and see if shooting performance returns to normal--but if it doesn't check the brake. The reason I'm a little cautions is everyone told me it was my threads, and it turned out the threads were fine--lemons do happen. I was lucky that the machinist helped me out measuring and finding the problem and I had a good company that RMA's the can.The more I've read, the more I believe it will be the threads on the barrel. The brake is an APA Fat Bastard 3, brand new, not likely that we got a bad one. The barrel was threaded by a local gunsmith. I don't know him at all, he was recommended to my friend by someone else. I will remove the brake and shoot it this weekend and I expect it to be good. If the barrel threading was bad, what are the options? Cut and rethread (with a competent smith)? New barrel? That would really suck. He'd have to go back to the original gunsmith and try to get him to make it right. Thanks for all the input!