I have some form of cheek riser on the majority of my traditional-stock long guns, have never thought much about it, but in setting up my newest rig I got to ponderin'.
Given that there is always going to be at least an inch of additional height above the centerline of the barrel when peeking through an optic, why is the comb always so low?
Is it that most manufacturers want to keep a certain look to their stocks, fit be damned?
Is everyone else's face built so line of sight is much closer to correct than mine is?
Is everyone just lifting their head to fit the scope and being content with unstable head placement?
Is a donut with no hole just a danish?
Given that there is always going to be at least an inch of additional height above the centerline of the barrel when peeking through an optic, why is the comb always so low?
Is it that most manufacturers want to keep a certain look to their stocks, fit be damned?
Is everyone else's face built so line of sight is much closer to correct than mine is?
Is everyone just lifting their head to fit the scope and being content with unstable head placement?
Is a donut with no hole just a danish?