• Frank's Lesson's Contest

    We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!

    Create a channel Learn more
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

Coup De Grâce, New Action from American Rifle Company, $899 WOW!

I always preferred David’s narration.
It looks like he’s bitten off more than he can chew. Wrestling with a custom action decision without having the advantage in the decision’s native environment. It looks like the decision is winning at this point and Jim may be a goner. But first these words from National Geographic.
 
You can thank Wayfair v South Dakota for that... Ugh.

Nearly every place I order from now hits me with tax, unless they're small enough be be under the collection threshold of $100k in annual sales to your particular state (or whatever the current tax code is) and don't have to charge you. And that's not even a guarantee... Some places that I know are too small to charge tax hit me with tax, and some places I know are well over that $100k annual sales threshold don't charge me tax... Go figure.

I always prefer to buy from a good supporting vendor that doesn't hit me with sales tax, but they're very hard to find nowadays.

In other news, the longer I look at this pile of parts that's only waiting for an action the more I regret waiting until 2/11 to order. I told myself I wasn't in a hurry and the action will be here when it's here, but patience doesn't fill the CDG-shaped hole in my parts pile, lol.
I hear you...
 
Well you’d hear about God’s own Impact 737r owners bitching otherwise.
Speaking of Impact, how does their inlet compare to the ARC actions? I have a Mausingfield I want to put in a McMillan stock and the company has either R700 or Impact 787 inlets and I’m trying to decide which is best.
 
Speaking of Impact, how does their inlet compare to the ARC actions? I have a Mausingfield I want to put in a McMillan stock and the company has either R700 or Impact 787 inlets and I’m trying to decide which is best.
The port length on the CDG is very long, cant see either inlet working with it. The rear edge of the ejection port cutout on the stock will protrude well into the cdg port. You ordering direct? Mcmillan 100% has a Mausingfield inlet.
 
The port length on the CDG is very long, cant see either inlet working with it. The rear edge of the ejection port cutout on the stock will protrude well into the cdg port. You ordering direct? Mcmillan 100% has a Mausingfield inlet.

OTM has the Game Warden 2.0 In McWalnut on the shelf and I have an open top Mausingfield in 30-06 that would fit its style perfectly. Kind of like a poor man’s Griffin and Howe All American but without the $19,000 wood stock.
 
Anyone tried the CDG in a Manners mini chassis? Does it fit or do modifications have to be made to the chassis? Also do AW mags run or does mag catch have to be modified? Thanks

Depends when the stock was made and what generation mini chassis it is.

The mini chassis in a fairly new TCS that I have looks like it will clear the trigger hanger just fine, which makes sense because people drop Impact 737s into TCS stocks all the time with no issues.

The mini chassis in a T4A that I have that was built around 2013-ish looks like it would need to be clearanced for the trigger hanger.

Can't confirm AW function with the stock mini chassis mag latch in the TCS that I have as I'm still waiting for my CDG. My hunch is an AW mag will run with an unmodified latch, but an AICS mag will need the latch trimmed to lower the mag so the feed lips don't interfere with the large diameter bolt.
 
Last edited:
Depends when the stock was made and what generation mini chassis it is.

The mini chassis in a fairly new TCS that I have looks like it will clear the trigger hanger just fine, which makes sense because people drop Impact 737s into TCS stocks all the time with no issues.

The mini chassis in a T4A that I have that was built around 2013-ish looks like it would need to be clearanced for the trigger hanger.

Can't confirm AW function with the stock mini chassis mag latch in the TCS that I have as I'm still waiting for my CDG. My hunch is an AW mag will run with an unmodified latch, but an AICS mag will need the latch trimmed to lower the mag so the feed lips don't interfere with the large diameter bolt.
Appreciate the info!
 
Depends when the stock was made and what generation mini chassis it is.

The mini chassis in a fairly new TCS that I have looks like it will clear the trigger hanger just fine, which makes sense because people drop Impact 737s into TCS stocks all the time with no issues.
The T2A GAP (with Gen2 MCS) I bought two years ago cleared a 737 no problem and fed from AW mags without issue.
 
Does anybody have any recommendations for cleaning rod length for the CDG on Xylo chassis? This would be length in addition to barrel of course. I‘m still waiting on my action, but it would be nice to get all the other bits out of the way.
 
Does anybody have any recommendations for cleaning rod length for the CDG on Xylo chassis? This would be length in addition to barrel of course. I‘m still waiting on my action, but it would be nice to get all the other bits out of the way.
Longer the better, barrel length + action length + stock length + couple inches for the tip to exit barrel and your knuckles a couple inches from hitting the buttstock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USK308 and pingunit
Longer the better, barrel length + action length + stock length + couple inches for the tip to exit barrel and your knuckles a couple inches from hitting the buttstock.
An ARC nucleus with 26” barrel is about 46”. Adding a couple of ‘couple inches’ puts that at 50”+. Looking at the Xylo chassis, it seems there would be decent room to work a rod above the buttstock. But maybe looks are deceiving.

Another random question: Would it be a terrible idea to get a rod for 5.56 and use it for my AR’s and 6.5? Boretech specs 0.205” and 0.221” for those two calibers. I’d give up a ’little’ rigidity for the 6.5. And of course would be using a monster long rod for cleaning an AR. Rod tips… do they have common diameter (barrel, not brush) and threading at this size?
 
Last edited:
An ARC nucleus with 26” barrel is about 46”. Adding a couple of ‘couple inches’ puts that at 50”+. Looking at the Xylo chassis, it seems there would be decent room to work a rod above the buttstock. But maybe looks are deceiving.
Don't hurt to have more, can' put more on later.
Another random question: Would it be a terrible idea to get a rod for 5.56 and use it for my AR’s and 6.5?
Works
Rod tips… do they have common diameter and threading at this size?
Yes
 
She’s in jail for the weekend. All my 4473s get delayed because I’m a non-immigrant alien, but I meet the exception requirements.
18C8C1C7-1C19-4456-BCEE-968AD32F557B.jpeg
 
From the picture it looks like an excessive amount of tooling marks. Am I crazy?
Yeah, that bolt is so poorly done they scooped parts of it out!

😂

Underside has tooling marks but that’s hidden by the waterline of the stock. Are you talking about in front of the ejection port it looks like there could be something there under the nitriding?
 
Yeah, that bolt is so poorly done they scooped parts of it out!

😂

Underside has tooling marks but that’s hidden by the waterline of the stock. Are you talking about in front of the ejection port it looks like there could be something there under the nitriding?
Yeah, in front of the ejection port the circle tooling. Also it looks like a bunch behind the bolt knob and on the bolt shroud as well.
 
From the picture it looks like an excessive amount of tooling marks. Am I crazy?
Yeah, in front of the ejection port the circle tooling. Also it looks like a bunch behind the bolt knob and on the bolt shroud as well.
I manage to put wear marks on every tool I use where the intended wear is most likely to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schütze and lash