Re: CT elementary school shooting.
I am grateful for the 'teacher' comment, but that's not quite where I'm coming from.
I am also, and moreso, a Marine Veteran with combat experience; and I am therefore adamant that the horrors and hardships that I have witnessed while there should never have to become facts of of life for our small children.
But they have.
I weigh rights vs children, and I must admit that we have some hard thinking and hard choices to make, because the President is right on the one score. This cannot continue.
I do not believe that isolating responsible owners and shooters or depicting them as contributors to the negative side of this problem we have is going to help alleviate the horror. They do not fit the stereotypes and characterizations that strive to paint them in an evil shade. Responsible gun owners and their advocates are not the authors of this problem, nor do they callously and jealously cling to their guns in selfish defiance of those who would resolve it. They, we, have just as much a vested interest in finding an equitable solution as any other participant in the coming debates.
I do not believe that freedoms in this area must be sacrificed for the sake of safety. If what we have tried to do to make our world a safer place that includes private firearms ownership has failed, then we need to try still harder. For history clearly shows us that where private firearms ownership is preempted, far worse atrocities have followed close on that preemption's heels. Nobody in their right minds can believe the task is easy, but it must be achieved; the alternative is certain, and its name is "Tyranny". Like it or not, those are the choices that history clearly demonstrates with implacable impartiality.
People really need to take heed that since 1968, we have followed the legislative pathway of curtailing freedom in the interest of public safety.t. We have tried altering our society in this interest, and for better or worse, this deliberate alteration is just as much a signal contributor in the problem we have today as any other argument on either side.
If more would have worked or could work, we should have been seeing <span style="font-style: italic">some</span> trend toward remediation by now. To my own eyes, none appears; quite the opposite in plain fact. When others see one, I suspect they could be of the same distinction as the folks who complimented the Emperor on his new attire.
This is no longer a matter for the haggling arena of public politics. I think that politicians who insist otherwise will be met with public outrage, and rightly so. What we have now is in no small way the result of their political haggling. They have failed; that approach does not work. We thank them for their zealous efforts, but they have had ample opportunity and they have failed. Failed.
The political arena has had its chance, and the politicians need to step aside, out of the way of the people with their feet on the actual ground, so they can untie their hands and solve this problem in the light of good conscience and human goodness. What that good conscience should be is not a matter for political debate. What that common goodness should be can never be a political issue.
Likewise, freedom's champions are little better off where righteous insistence on freedom at any cost prevails. There are some costs that are too great to bear. If you doubt me, ask your own parents, or your children.
Where freedom is concerned, all give some, some give all and right now that includes our own small ones. That can never be right. Surely we need to soften our hearts and listen..., at least listen...
We need to get to another place, where this horror is not a frequent visitor. None of us can complete that journey without sacrifice. When children are dying, every one of us is at a loss. Every one of us can afford our own dearly heartfelt contribution to an equitable solution.
I am onboard this train wreck for the duration. I <span style="font-style: italic">will</span> take part in its solution. So must we all.
Greg