First I never said all violently offenders get bail at the first hearing
[/QUOTE]
You specifically listed heinous crimes in comparison. I responded only to what you wrote.
, but some do, hypocritical to say the least considering your straw man complaining earlier.
[/QUOTE]
It is not hypocritical or a straw man to respond to what you wrote and the crimes you personally listed as a comparison to Floyd.
The simple fact to you evidently that a system where depending on what attorney you hire dictates your freedom is working perfectly says enough about you.
[/QUOTE]
I suppose it might if I ever said it was working perfectly. Now go back and find where I made such a claim or just admit that you made that up because you are getting frustrated.
You didn’t bother to read or at least try to comprehend my point
[/QUOTE]
I did, and I will continue to try to do so for the rest of this post that you wrote.
I am glad that evidently you will sleep better at night knowing
[/QUOTE]
So, your point is personal bullshit, and, again, made up. I wrote nothing like that. You are just inventing it. I understand your point. It is your imagination and arguing with what you wish I said instead of addressing what I actually wrote.
this marine veteran and former congressional candidate who is obviously such a dangerous criminal compared to all the others that made bail is locked up, because of course election interference is a capital crime and should be treated as such, and we should expect any judge to deny bail for such a heinous charge, unless of course he hired a attorney, then somehow he isn’t a risk to commit a crime while on bail. The fact that he is tied to Trump in this case couldn’t have possibly influenced the decision, it shouldn’t even cross someone’s mind, especially yours evidently.
I did not say it is right, but, yes, unfortunately, if you have violent crimes in your criminal history and show up without a lawyer for serious felonies, you probably should not just expect automatic bail at your first appearance. I did not say I like it, but that is the way it is. Trump has nothing to do with it.
By the way I looked up the previous charge after your “violent crimes vs law enforcement”. He is accused of getting into a yelling match with 2 fbi agents who without a warrant tried to force open his door to serve a subpoena, at one point Harrison allegedly hit one of the agents with his chest. Your right such a vicious attack, how did the agent survive getting chest bumped? Such a dangerous criminal with such a violent crime against law enforcement, I mean making chest to chest contact is often fatal. Yes I’m being sarcastic, your description of a violent crime against law enforcement is ridiculous.
You obviously did not look very closely. Hell, I made it easy for you by quoting and posting above. He had already been served, then he decided to leave his home and chase the two officers, who were leaving, and then bump one of them back while screaming and then bump him back again. Nobody said it was "fatal," lol but I dare you to try it with a cop contacting you in an official capacity, after it is over and he is trying to leave. Go ahead. Let us know how it works out.
Battery is a violent crime. This was battery on a police officer. You can try to dress it up however you want, but that is exactly what it was.
From post # 96:
Floyd ran into one of the agents in the stairwell, “striking him chest to chest” and knocking him backward, the affidavit says. Then he chest-bumped the same agent again, ignoring commands to back away. Instead, Floyd began jabbing a finger in the agent's face as he kept screaming.
The affidavit says Floyd only backed down when the second agent showed Floyd his badge and holstered gun.
Floyd returned to his apartment and called 911 to report that two men had threatened him at his home, one of them armed with a gun.
“They were lucky I didn’t have a gun on me, because I would have shot his (expletive) ass,” Floyd told a dispatcher, according to the FBI agent's affidavit.
That, Mr. Jgault, is battery. It is not, however, "fatal." Glad we agree on that much.