Dr. Jack Minzey on Civil War in U.S.A

[Xshot]

SOUNDS LIKE MINZEY HAD SOME SMARTS!


Dr. Jack Minzey on Civil War in U.S. Today ….Jack passed away Sunday, 8 April 2018.

Professionally, Jack was head of the Department of Education at Eastern Michigan University as well as a prolific author of numerous books, most of which were on the topic of Education and the Government role therein.

This is the last of his works: Civil War

How do civil wars happen?

Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can't settle the question through elections because they don't even agree that elections are how you decide who's in charge. That's the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you hate each other but accept the election results, you have a country.

When you stop accepting election results, you have a countdown to a civil war.

The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an election. We all know that. But it's not the first time they've done this. The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn't really win. The Supreme Court gave him the election. There's a pattern here.

What do sure odds of the Democrats rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don't accept the results of any election that they don't win It means they don't believe that transfers of power in this country are determined by elections. That's a civil war.

There's no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to kill a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government.

This isn't dissent. It's not disagreement. You can hate the other party. You can think they're the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next election.

When you consistently reject the results of elections that you don't win, what you want is a dictatorship. Your very own dictatorship .

The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Democrats, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it's inherently illegitimate. The Democrats lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can't scratch his own back without his say so, that's the civil war.

Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that's not the system that runs this country. The Democrat's system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country.

If the Democrats are in the White House, then the president can do anything And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for illegal aliens. He can fine you for not having health insurance. His power is unlimited. He's a dictator.

But when Republicans get into the White House, suddenly the President can't do anything. He isn't even allowed to undo the illegal alien amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Democrat in the White House has 'discretion' to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Republican doesn't even have the 'discretion' to reverse him. That's how the game is played That's how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn't yet won that particular fight.

When a Democrat is in the White House, states aren't even allowed to enforce immigration law. But when a Republican is in the White House, states can create their own immigration laws. Under Obama, a state wasn't allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries.

The Constitution has something to say about that.

Whether it's Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship.

Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can't serve in if you're not a member. If you haven't been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren't in the club. And Trump isn't in the club. He brought in a bunch of people who aren't in the club with him.

Now we're seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down. That's not a free country.

It's not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an 'insurance policy' against Trump winning the election. It's not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It's not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It's not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an election because the guy who wasn't supposed to win did.

Have no doubt, we're in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and a leftist Democrat professional government.

I hope you pass this around.

 

[Phineas7]

I make an effort to verify something before propagating it. Even if it's something I agree with. Multiple sources indicate this was written by Daniel Greenfield and given as a speech about a year ago.

 

[Xshot]

Don't who Dr. Jack Minzey is and don't really care, but found the content interesting. If you believe SNOPES I feel sorry for you.

 

[W54/XM-388]

Whoever wrote or didn't write it probably means little to most.
The points it makes however are rather important and fit current events a bit too well.

 

[ArmyJerry]

I think it turns to a shooting war sooner than most people think. Probably in the next election.

 

[Xshot]

Exactly why I posted it. Daniel Greenfield did use it in a speech he gave 1 year ago, word-for-word, to the S. Carolina Tea Party Convention. It has been attributed to Dr. Jack Minzey.

What I can't stand is when an asshat contests the source/content and only gives a one side ctitique!

 

[FS1]

The Battle lines for such a war are not clear and defined. No North or South geography. Will it be Country vs City, State vs State or Neighbor vs Neighbor? Defining Left vs Right can in most cases be harder. If it goes there it's very ugly. I hope for the sake of everyone ugly gets Trumped. JMHO

 

[Rthur]

The Battle lines for such a war are not clear and defined. No North or South geography. Will it be Country vs City, State vs State or Neighbor vs Neighbor? Defining Left vs Right can in most cases be harder. If it goes there it's very ugly. I hope for the sake of everyone ugly gets Trumped. JMHO

The left has to "signal" their stance for all the world to see.
Bumper stickers is a good start.

R

 

[W54/XM-388]

Bumper stickers is a good start.
R

Hence why I don't do bumper or car stickers.

 

[FS1]

If they become the enemy, never underestimate them.

 

[Movistar]

I need more ammo

 

[Blue Sky Country]

For those who think it will actually be a 'war' as in a conventional engagement between well defined forces, it will not be anything like that at all. As a matter of fact, it will be as far from that as anyone can imagine.

For starters, refer to the Lincoln County War during Billy the Kid's time. That is pretty much how a modern 'civil war' will go down. Certain groups of people who have been oppressed, brutalized and kept down the most will lose all faith in the 'system' trying to fix things and begin to whack the corrupt and thieving mofo's who were directly responsible for their suffering.

At first, there will be panic and surprise from the recipients of such violence, but as the bodies begin to accumulate, they will come to their senses quickly and begin striking back with retaliatory attacks. By this point, the state's peacekeeping forces, mostly the civilian police, will likely be pressed in to control the bloodshed and in order to "accomplish" that, expect drastic measures such as no-knock warrants, street checkpoints and random stop and frisks. Those uniformed peacekeepers on the front lines of doing such work will likely become targets too, and certain members of the jackboots might also be bought by the initially feuding groups, now adding a paramilitary element to the strife.

In all, the peacekeeping resources of the state will be stretched to the breaking point if no political tabletop compromises can be reached, and because of the potential wearing out of police and investigative resources, other people not directly involved in the conflict may also take the opportunity to settle long-existing scores. Could be a drug deal gone sour in the past, or some other type of beef. Expect blood money to be taken by the time shit has reached this point.

There will be no uniforms to distinguish the feuding sides. No battle lines or trenches. Everything will be unfolding right on the streets in real time. The pervasive atmosphere will be one of constant fear and suspicion, as every dark shadow and alleyway may very well contain a guy or multiple guys with ski masks and MAC-10's. Kill or be killed. Anybody with half a brain who wishes to live through it all will be investing in armament and ammunition. That will be the reality of a 'civil war'.

 

[Snipe260]

For those who think it will actually be a 'war' as in a conventional engagement between well defined forces, it will not be anything like that at all. As a matter of fact, it will as far from that as anyone can imagine.

For starters, refer to the Lincoln County War during Billy the Kid's time. That is pretty much how a modern 'civil war' will go down. Certain groups of people who have been oppressed, brutalized and kept down the most will lose all faith in the 'system' trying to fix things and begin to whack the corrupt and thieving mofo's who were directly responsible for their suffering.

At first, there will be panic and surprise from the recipients of such violence, but as the bodies begin to accumulate, they will come to their senses quickly and begin striking back with retaliatory attacks. By this point, the state's peacekeeping forces, mostly the civilian police, will likely be pressed in to control the bloodshed and in order to "accomplish" that, expect drastic measures such as no-knock warrants, street checkpoints and random stop and frisks. Those uniformed peacekeepers on the front lines of doing such work will likely become targets too, and certain members of the jackboots might also be bought by the initially feuding groups, now adding a paramilitary element to the strife.

In all, the peacekeeping resources of the state will be stretched to the breaking point if no political tabletop compromises can be reached, and because of the potential wearing out of police and investigative resources, other people not directly involved in the conflict may also take the opportunity to settle long-existing scores. Could be a drug deal gone sour in the past, or some other type of beef. Expect blood money to be taken by the time shit has reached this point.

There will be no uniforms to distinguish the feuding sides. No battle lines of trenches. Everything will be unfolding right on the streets in real time. The pervasive atmosphere will be one of constant fear and suspicion, as every dark shadow and alleyway may very well contain a guy or guys with ski masks and MAC-10's. Kill or be killed. Anybody with half a brain who wishes to live through it all will be investing in armament and ammunition. That will be the reality of a 'civil war'.

Agreed!

 

[Rthur]

Something to consider:
If there is anything resembling a civil war they will be "justified" in instituting Martial Law.
Once in place why would they rescind it?

R

 

[308pirate]

If you would like a preview, check out The Troubles in Northern Ireland.