Albuquerque? I bet that the APD was pissed that they didn't get to join in.
Losing one to the bureau probably won’t hurt their numbers too bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeAlbuquerque? I bet that the APD was pissed that they didn't get to join in.
There were two others last week you all haven’t discussed yet…
I think you may be right I got the following message PM’d to me today.This is hilarous - there are at least 4 feds, if not 5 posting here!! I would hazzard to say one fed per page lol!! And the FauxBois are bitching with the C--A's lol!
There's probably a lot more.
There’s seems to be nearly as many agenda driven posts on this site as sincere ones. The worst part is watching the glowing accounts waddle over to the technical sections and share their “knowledge” to thicken their “cover”.
Looked up what I believe are the others. They seem extremely hush about those events.Nah, but having four in less than two weeks is unusual.
Because of the neighbors who got out their phone and recorded. Staying ahead of the narrative is priority.Looked up what I believe are the others. They seem extremely hush about those events.
My question is why is this one, Utah, being made public? You can hardly find the others though inter web searches.
Well if you read the others they are not releasing information, or at least in my short look into it. In fact had to wade through multiple storys about this Utah event.Because of the neighbors who got out their phone and recorded. Staying ahead of the narrative is priority.
That would be a question for the media in those locales. My guess is that some mope shooting it out with the cops at 0615 just isn’t out of the ordinary. I.e., not newsworthy.Looked up what I believe are the others. They seem extremely hush about those events.
My question is why is this one, Utah, being made public? You can hardly find the others though inter web searches.
It’s funny to see every account less than a year old summarily labeled as a fed and harassed. Might be running off good folks…
Yeah, because who in their right mind brings a handful of guys along to take over the government in a well publicized freakin' insurrection - and doesn't bring guns? It's almost like it was just a protest or something?Just think what would have happened if all those J6 fags would have showed up with their guns! That would have interdasting!
One was in Albuquerque and the other in PA somewhere.
Oh well. Maybe next time.Yeah, because who in their right mind brings a handful of guys along to take over the government in a well publicized freakin' insurrection - and doesn't bring guns? It's almost like it was just a protest or something?
Kinda the point I am driving.PA one was Tioga North Philly near Temple - I would call that a "no-go zone" myself. They were investigating a guy robbing Seven-Elevens. He was a Biden voter, so you won't hear about it.
Holy shit!!! It's GringoJohn! But he's a homo. No one is afraid of homos!
Sorry, I didn’t interpret your question as looking for an opinion.Kinda the point I am driving.
But I understand why they don't give opinion responses and defer to the others doing it. I have watched enough congressional testimony. Figured I'd ask anyway.
Well, why do yo think this is getting more more attention than the other 3 situations this week. Especially as some of the others, like the kids robbing 7/11’s (philly)were actually committing crimes.Sorry, I didn’t interpret your question as looking for an opinion.
Yes yes… the element of surprise…Holy shit!!! It's GringoJohn! But he's a homo. No one is afraid of homos!
Is this situation getting more attention in the media, or just here in the Pit? Genuine question…I haven’t watched news of any of this stuff.Well, why do yo think this is getting more more attention than the other 3 situations this week. Especially as some of the others, like the kids robbing 7/11’s (philly)were actually committing crimes.
While what this guy (utah) did was really really stupid, I personally don’t think he was going to make good on his rants.
The fact that he was a gun loving Trump supporter and was killed is what makes them all giddy inside. The leftists in media love hearing about things like that and cannot wait to share with the world.Is this situation getting more attention in the media, or just here in the Pit? Genuine question…I haven’t watched news of any of this stuff.
Anyway, if it’s getting more media attention, I think it’s because it’s related to threats to a President. Threats to public officials which actually result in a law enforcement action are rare. And when I say “action” I mean other than a simple interview “hey, knock it off” kind of action.
Also, it happened in a place that’s not the usual hotspot for shootings (this is an assumption based on the fact I don’t ever hear about Provo, UT). Like Uvalde…little town in conservative, fly-over America.
I don’t know if this guy would’ve made good on his threats and rants. What he was saying online isn’t what got him killed.
ETA - I also think the media is lefty as fuck and they want to highlight the fact Robertson was a gun-loving Trump supporter.
“Them” being media? I don’t disagree.The fact that he was a gun loving Trump supporter and was killed is what makes them all giddy inside. The leftists in media love hearing about things like that and cannot wait to share with the world.
100%. Its what he did in the moment, that morning.I don’t know if this guy would’ve made good on his threats and rants. What he was saying online isn’t what got him killed.
It’s all BS. Nobody makes ghillie suits in that old mans size.
It got more media attention because it plays fully into the narrative. Trump supporters are all psychotic gun toting murderers! They want to paint us all with a broad brush that we either belong in jail or deserve to die, not because of our actions but simply because of our beliefs. Beliefs which are in total opposition of theirs. There is no time or place for civil discussion, just name calling and threats until somebody can justify the use of force on their political opponent, and that force it is the DOJ in one of its 3 letter iterations.Is this situation getting more attention in the media, or just here in the Pit? Genuine question…I haven’t watched news of any of this stuff.
Anyway, if it’s getting more media attention, I think it’s because it’s related to threats to a President. Threats to public officials which actually result in a law enforcement action are rare. And when I say “action” I mean other than a simple interview “hey, knock it off” kind of action.
Also, it happened in a place that’s not the usual hotspot for shootings (this is an assumption based on the fact I don’t ever hear about Provo, UT). Like Uvalde…little town in conservative, fly-over America.
I don’t know if this guy would’ve made good on his threats and rants. What he was saying online isn’t what got him killed.
ETA - I also think the media is lefty as fuck and they want to highlight the fact Robertson was a gun-loving Trump supporter.
It got more media attention because it plays fully into the narrative. Trump supporters are all psychotic gun toting murderers! They want to paint us all with a broad brush that we either belong in jail or deserve to die, not because of our actions but simply because of our beliefs. Beliefs which are in total opposition of theirs. There is no time or place for civil discussion, just name calling and threats until somebody can justify the use of force on their political opponent, and that force it is the DOJ in one of its 3 letter iterations.
One would certainly hope so as it shouldn't be about political affiliation, but right and wrong. Certainly we are all aware that the Leftist leaning candidates are the ones weaponizing the .gov against the average citizen.Don’t think the glowfeds only look at the Right. There are some militant trannies out there getting attention!
Don’t think the glowfeds only look at the Right. There are some militant trannies out there getting attention!
No shit! They’re referred to as Tranarchists.
Camo nets and GP MediumsIt’s all BS. Nobody makes ghillie suits in that old mans size.
Thats not punishment... This is punishment.
Look for those with 1,000s of post, who have put in years of work creating cover. Those that post all day long, claiming to have jobs, but somehow have time to post all day long. Those that are constantly calling others feds. Those imbedded in every part of the fourm. Those that actually do shoot long distance, spending years on fantastic cover. Those that tiptoe the line of saying things that could be construed as threats, yet just say enough to lure people in to trust them. They are generally the "bullies" of the site, because most LE have that general trait and can't curb it, because it is bred in them. Anyway, those are the ones I would look at..........among others. If my goal was to actually find people of concern, that is how I would approach it, have to put in the effort.How do you spot them? What do you look for? Are they using tactics that give it away?
You mean all those lefties that were gunned down by the FBI and DOJ following the 2016 election and all the death threats made against trump.......Don’t think the glowfeds only look at the Right. There are some militant trannies out there getting attention!
You don’t know what a tranny is?You mean all those lefties that were gunned down by the FBI and DOJ following the 2016 election and all the death threats made against trump.......
Doc
Never thought of it that way but probably true…funny!More than likely, the people some of them deem as "dangerous" - are probably imbedded members of competing organizations or departments.
Given all of the potential sites out there claiming "Feds" are participating, it seems like a highly unlikely use of government resources, just having employees on sites all day long with no particular objective, hoping to come up with something.Look for those with 1,000s of post, who have put in years of work creating cover. Those that post all day long, claiming to have jobs, but somehow have time to post all day long. Those that are constantly calling others feds. Those imbedded in every part of the fourm. Those that actually do shoot long distance, spending years on fantastic cover. Those that tiptoe the line of saying things that could be construed as threats, yet just say enough to lure people in to trust them. They are generally the "bullies" of the site, because most LE have that general trait and can't curb it, because it is bred in them. Anyway, those are the ones I would look at..........among others. If my goal was to actually find people of concern, that is how I would approach it, have to put in the effort.
If they think somebody has "potential" - they'll begin a PM conversation. You know, on account they are making friends and stuff.Given all of the potential sites out there claiming "Feds" are participating, it seems like a highly unlikely use of government resources, just having employees on sites all day long with no particular objective, hoping to come up with something.
Also look for those provocative posts.Look for those with 1,000s of post, who have put in years of work creating cover. Those that post all day long, claiming to have jobs, but somehow have time to post all day long. Those that are constantly calling others feds. Those imbedded in every part of the fourm. Those that actually do shoot long distance, spending years on fantastic cover. Those that tiptoe the line of saying things that could be construed as threats, yet just say enough to lure people in to trust them. They are generally the "bullies" of the site, because most LE have that general trait and can't curb it, because it is bred in them. Anyway, those are the ones I would look at..........among others. If my goal was to actually find people of concern, that is how I would approach it, have to put in the effort.
Given all of the potential sites out there claiming "Feds" are participating, it seems like a highly unlikely use of government resources, just having employees on sites all day long with no particular objective, hoping to come up with something.
Except a lot of non fed people have desk jobsLook for those with 1,000s of post, who have put in years of work creating cover. Those that post all day long, claiming to have jobs, but somehow have time to post all day long. Those that are constantly calling others feds. Those imbedded in every part of the fourm. Those that actually do shoot long distance, spending years on fantastic cover. Those that tiptoe the line of saying things that could be construed as threats, yet just say enough to lure people in to trust them. They are generally the "bullies" of the site, because most LE have that general trait and can't curb it, because it is bred in them. Anyway, those are the ones I would look at..........among others. If my goal was to actually find people of concern, that is how I would approach it, have to put in the effort.
You come from smart stockMy grandparents had that on the wall next to the bar ever one ate at. Would read it nearly every time you ate there.
Still hanging on that wall. Been there since the early 1960’s.
is difficult to read that and not feel a tinge of sympathy for Mark Essex.