Has anyone else had issues getting matching results from the sig AB software compared to kestrel or AB quantum?
The sig seems to be reporting smaller wind holds and slightly different elevation differences when compared to the kestrel/quantum apps.
I have matched all target and environmental between the platforms and I don’t have any MV truing or calibration data in any of the profiles.
I can reproduce this regardless of whether the profiles are CDM or g7 and regardless of whether I sync them from the sig software or AB quantum.
The sig seems to be reporting smaller wind holds and slightly different elevation differences when compared to the kestrel/quantum apps.
I have matched all target and environmental between the platforms and I don’t have any MV truing or calibration data in any of the profiles.
I can reproduce this regardless of whether the profiles are CDM or g7 and regardless of whether I sync them from the sig software or AB quantum.
