Fits the unit snugly, nothing else. Ten bucks at Amazon. Zippered hard case.Still looking. Please share your finds,
Xero hard case
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fits the unit snugly, nothing else. Ten bucks at Amazon. Zippered hard case.Still looking. Please share your finds,
Lol! That’s awesome. I never saw that design of Leofoto clamp with the lever. Which rail did you end up with?Great minds and all. It allllmost fits nicely in a Magpul Daka Organzier but is a bit stretched. Ended up getting a Savior IFAK bag from amazon that will have enough room for my kestrel too. Magpul is releasing a bigger version of the Daka Organizer soon that I'll probably pick up...I really like them.
FYI: This go pro case
go pro case will fit with the neweer QD plate.
View attachment 8263141View attachment 8263142
Any tricks to get it to update through the ShotView App? I connect and see its at 3.06 and it wants to go to 3.16 but it wont.
View attachment 8263425
Unpaired it with my phone and repaired and let it sit. It worked Thank you.If you connect via USB cable to your PC and use the PC Garmin Express app you can send the firmware update immediately.
If you connect via the phone app and Bluetooth it can take about 5 minutes until it prompts you to install the update.
Lol! That’s awesome. I never saw that design of Leofoto clamp with the lever. Which rail did you end up with?
I’m now looking for a hard case with foam I can cut. The Pelican 1060 with 1062 foam will work but will have almost no space between parts. It’d be super tight. Evergreen 56 case on Amazon is slightly bigger but they don’t seem to sell separate foam to cut for this case.
Ya sure.View attachment 8263626
So what was it someone wanted to compare with two of these units side by side?...
Something about different locations?
It seems i have the opportunity this weekend if it's still a question
Ok I'll see what I can manage.Ya sure.
3ft away, parallel with the muzzle vs as close to the muzzle as possible.
As far back from the muzzle as possible - say 3 feet behind the muzzle, even behind the shooter, vs 7 inches in 2axis from the muzzle.
Those would be a start. If they turn out to be exactly the same shot by shot, regardless of placement, I think it'll be tremendous confidence we'll get the same numbers no matter what as long as it picks up the shot.
Put one behind a plate @500 or 600y & shoot over the plate. Read muzzle & distance. Instead of tweeking MV in kestral for 0-600, lock it & tweek BC to get Kestral aligned. Not sure this will actually improve things, but I'm curious how well the kestrel velocity prediction aligns with real data.Ok I'll see what I can manage.
I'm not a video guy but I'll see if I can manage something
Start with both side by side first to make sure they get similar numbers then I'll go through as many options as I can think of
As you said:
Parallel offset difference
Horizontal offset distance
Maybe directly under muzzle vs off to side
If anyone thinks of something let me know and I'll try
This for sure.Put one behind a plate @500 or 600y & shoot over the plate. Read muzzle & distance. Instead of tweeking MV in kestral for 0-600, lock it & tweek BC to get Kestral aligned. Not sure this will actually improve things, but I'm curious how well the kestrel velocity prediction aligns with real data.
Put one behind a plate @500 or 600y & shoot over the plate. Read muzzle & distance. Instead of tweeking MV in kestral for 0-600, lock it & tweek BC to get Kestral aligned. Not sure this will actually improve things, but I'm curious how well the kestrel velocity prediction aligns with real data.
This for sure.
If you have the gear/range, putting one behind a plate at distance and seeing if it picks up the round would be amazing.
Even if it's a 100yds, will be cool to see if it picks it up.
Ok I'll see what I can manage.
I'm not a video guy but I'll see if I can manage something
Start with both side by side first to make sure they get similar numbers then I'll go through as many options as I can think of
As you said:
Parallel offset difference
Horizontal offset distance
Maybe directly under muzzle vs off to side
If anyone thinks of something let me know and I'll try
Yea I'll likely end up restoring to pics and text, but I'll try to catch video of each test.Even if you just take a picture of the situation then post speed if one or both are unreadable. Maybe take a tape measure and list that with the speed/locations. I think that would be easier than video.
I think 22s will be better for the tests anyway. Much more variance in FPS round per round, and especially so in the distance tests referred to.Yea I'll likely end up restoring to pics and text, but I'll try to catch video of each test.
I'm not a "content creator" by any means... I'm just thinking a short clip of the screens during each test
I'll prolly start with 22s and get the idea down. Then I can repeat with a center fire.
Any feature advancements with the new 3.16 update, or is it just software bugs getting worked out?
3.13... My bad. Long week.I don't see any update for 3.16. The latest is 3.13 as far as I can tell.
Positional shooting.Someone help me understand why mounting on the rifle is better than just setting up on tripod on the bench/ground?
I don't compete, so I don't need it for the real-time data reason. But I can see where doing this will be a nice "just in case" if there is calibration variance from distance to muzzle and from the side, this would position the chrono in the same spot for consistent readings from a set repeatable point. I'm not sure how picky the Garmin is within that 5-15" range F/B & L/R, as far as reading variance goes, but incase it is, it just eliminates one more factor. Also, like others have said, aiming at different targets in different directions, it stays with the POA for consistency in readings.Someone help me understand why mounting on the rifle is better than just setting up on tripod on the bench/ground?
For those trying to update via app / phone...
Maybe this is written somewhere but I don't recall seeing it
I noticed there is an indicator on the home screen
View attachment 8263742
If you watch that while hooking up to a unit that is eligible for an update you'll notice the wheel start loading.
View attachment 8263743
View attachment 8263744
After that wheel finished up I got this on the unit
View attachment 8263746
That miss was Hornady’s fault! See!Guys wanting real time data in matches and comps
I’m so used to load dev being mundane 100 yard target in fixed position, probably just engrained from the old Chrony days. Then came magnetospeed but that changed POI and then LabRadar which didn't seem big at the time but now seems enormous. With how small and light this is, I’m beginning to see the light. Garmin will rule the world with this thing!Positional shooting.
Shooting multiple targets at varying directions.
It just allows the data collection to be a secondary task. Which means most of us will end up collecting more data and be able to make better informed decisions.
Yes. The EE himself who helped develop it, shoots it off his 375 ELR guns. And it's been in development since before covid. The topic was discussed on the latest podcast of The Shooters Mindset.Are these things supposed to tolerate the recoil longterm when mounted on a rifle or is this something that may bite people in the ass later?
When the Xero is mounted to a rifle, I'm curious if the velocity returned by the Xero is skewed in any way by the recoil of the rifle.
During recoil the Xero would be moving in the opposite direction of the bullet. Would this impart a minor increase in the velocity of the bullet? Or is this negligible...
It would be simple enough for Garmin to include a solid state accelerometer in the Xero to account for any movement imparted by recoil.
How did you mount the Xero downrange?View attachment 8263976
I put one of these on each side of my Vudoo while checking a new lot of ammo.
Not particularly impressed with the ammo. However, pretty impressed with the two Garmins. Most shots measured within .2 or .3 fps of each other, with the worst being 1.7fps
I also set one at 100yds and passed some shots next to it to see velocity decay. The G1 BC that I came up with to match this was spot on with a number that my buddy has used to hit with his Rim-X out to 750. I know this would be better to do a little farther out, but I was just looking to try it out real quick and see how it worked. Didn't have an immediate need to test farther at the Applied Ballistics CDM I'm currently using seems to be on.
MagnetoSpeed would be affected the same way. Correlation data I’ve seen so far between both MS vs Xero mounted to gun have been pretty tight. First thing I’ll do when I get my Xero next week is correlate between my MS and Xero on MY gun. I’ll test Xero both mounted to gun and on a tripod to see if there is a difference.When the Xero is mounted to a rifle, I'm curious if the velocity returned by the Xero is skewed in any way by the recoil of the rifle.
During recoil the Xero would be moving in the opposite direction of the bullet. Would this impart a minor increase in the velocity of the bullet? Or is this negligible...
It would be simple enough for Garmin to include a solid state accelerometer in the Xero to account for any movement imparted by recoil.
I just set it on top of a 5 gallon bucket, dialed my 100yd elevation, and held 3 mils to the side of the unit.How did you mount the Xero downrange?
Hhaha, this guy fucks.I just set it on top of a 5 gallon bucket, dialed my 100yd elevation, and held 3 mils to the side of the unit.
Love this down range use model concept. If they add WIFI to the unit so you can get real time updates on your phone like the LongShot camera this would be yet another level of “game changer”.Hhaha, this guy fucks.
No plate or nothing. Love it.
Pretty soon, we'll have a vendor offer boutique ar500 armor for your Xero for downrange applications like this though - don't you worry none.
I shoot alot of 22lr 300+ yards, and really get alot of value out of CDMs and the such to get 1st rounds on target at distance. I will certainly be using the Xero down range - behind off the shelf ar500, in fact scraps I already have, mind you. Hoping for future offerings, capabilities in this regard. Be interesting to see what this new generation of offerings will bring.
True, but the best method would be for a single unit at the firing line to be able to give you FPS at various distances. MV, 50, 100, 150, 200, etc.Love this down range use model concept. If they add WIFI to the unit so you can get real time updates on your phone like the LongShot camera this would be yet another level of “game changer”.