I recently purchased a LaRue OBR 5.56 with 18" barrel from a fellow snipershide member. I am fully aware of the opinions many people on this board have of Mark LaRue, and to a lesser degree, his rifles. This thread is not intended to be a place for people to chime in with nothing more to contribute than, "LaRue sucks" or "Phuck Mark LaRue". I'm just discussing the new OBR I have and showing groups I've gotten so far. They are not consistent with what the rifle is supposed to be capable of, and I have not figured out what the issue is yet, but I also haven't tried everything I can think of yet either. This thread is basically a carryover from Elfster's 100 yard challenge thread, in which I posted groups from my LaRue OBR and Colt CRP-18. Elfster started asking questions that I knew would lead to that thread getting off track, so I started this one. Again, I'm not looking for anyone's opinion on Mark LaRue, the price of his rifles, his business practices, or anything of that nature. Simply having a conversation about getting this rifle to group, along with trying to learn more about my own abilities and how they can be improved.
Last week I finally completed a full 5 round 6 group 100 yard target for Elfster's thread with both my Colt CRP-18 .223 and LaRue OBR 5.56 18" barrel. I've had the Colt for about 6 months, and I just got the LaRue. I intended on selling the Colt, but so far, I have not been able to get the LaRue to outperform it. I've been spending the majority of my range time on my bolt guns, so I haven't really shot the Colt all that much. I figured doing the 100 yard challenge would be the best way to find out which rifle works best. I took them both out the weekend before last right after getting the LaRue. My buddy and I both shot groups with them. I will post pics from then and from last week when doing the 100 yard challenge.
Here's a description of both rifles:
LaRue OBR 5.56
Barrel: 18" - 1:8 twist
Scope: Vortex Razor 5-20, Mil/Mil
Mount: American Rifle Company M10 QD-L
Trigger: Geissele SSA Two-stage
Colt CRP-18 .223 Wylde
Barrel" 18" - 1:8 twist
Scope: SWFA 5-20 Mil/mil
Mount: Burris REPR (I know...cheap tires on a cadillac...but it works)
Trigger: Geissele SSA-E
If you were to read the specs on both you'd see they are basically the same rifle with a couple of exceptions. The Geissele two stage is a solid feeling trigger that you can feel both stages on. The SSA-E is called a two stage, but I only notice one stage. It's easier to smoothly pull the SSA-E compared to the true two stage. But I don't see that making a huge difference. The other difference is the chambering. 5.56 for the LaRue and .223 Wylde for the Colt. They both can fire the 5.56 and .223, but for the purposes of my tests I used 5.56 ammo for the LaRue and .223 ammo for the Colt.
These are pictures from 6/29/13 when my buddy and I both shot each rifle. The LaRue had approximately 70 rounds down the tube when these were taken, so I attributed the crappy groups to not being broken in yet. I was also trying some new shooting techniques that I had learned in a thread I started about "driving" gas guns and "loading bipods", but I did not use a bipod. These were shot with front and back bags from a cement bench. I was using Black Hills OTM 77gr. The pic is mine and the 2nd is my buddy. Elfster had suggested letting a buddy shoot the LaRue to see if he was getting something different to rule out any variables. There are only 4 groups of each.
My Groups
LaRue avg: 2.271
Colt avg: .965
My Buddy's Groups
LaRue avg: 2.987
Colt avg: 1.593
I went out on July 3 and did the full 6 group 100 yard challenge with both of the rifles at the same time. I alternated shooting 3 groups with each rifle until all 12 were shot. I used the same Black Hills OTM 77gr ammo. 5.56 for the LaRue and .223 for the Colt. More information had been posted in my "drive gas gun/load bipod" thread, namely from Lowlight, and I was applying some of it this day. So slightly altering a shooting technique is another variable to add to this equation. However, as you can see, it did not effect the Colt as much as it did the LaRue. Another factor, I had ran 200 additional rounds through the Larue prior to this trip to the range. So at this point, the LaRue had about 300 rounds and should be considered broken in. The Colt had around 500.
Colt Avg: .978
LaRue Avg: 1.68
Also note, as per Elfster's 100 yd challenge rules, all flyers count. There was one really bad flyer, or more likely just me yipping the shot because I was on my last group and pissed off (top right hand group), so that one shot opened the group up to 3.542, which was considerably outside the standard deviation of the groups. So I've assumed I used a measurement as if I had hit the dead center of the target which would've made that group be 1.322, and used that to get the 1.68 avg. Otherwise, the average would be 2.05, and I don't think that is a realistic measurement for purposes of this discussion.
One of the first things Elfster brought up was scope/mount, and to possibly remount the scope and shoot all over again to see if that was the problem. I don't think that is the problem. It's a Vortex Razor mounted in an American Rifle Company one piece quality mount. I took this off of my .308 bolt gun and put directly onto the LaRue without taking the scope out of the rings. Below is a picture of groups shot with the .308, and this is using remanufactured ammo from freedom munitions. The rifle is capable of much better, but this should negate the scope issue variable (or at least I think it does).
So here's where I'm at so far. I'm going back out on Saturday to see what else I can do with it. One thing I haven't played with yet is the gas adjustment. Fine tuning it could close the groups in a bit, but I've never adjusted the Colt. Also, LaRue recommends using FGMM 77gr, and I've been using Black Hills match 77gr stuff. I'll try to get my hands on a couple of boxes of FGMM to test with, but I can't imagine that alone closing the groups nearly .75" to get them into the guaranteed sub MOA accuracy LaRue touts. The other variable is the bore. I usually clean the bore after a trip to the range, but I did not clean either one before the 7/3 trip. Both rifles had at least 100 rounds of carbon and copper build up in the bore going to the range.
As I'm sure you can tell, I'm one of the newer guys that's here to learn. There are plenty of things I think I know, but I'm not going to put those out here right now. I'm open to feedback from you more experienced guys on what could be causing this.
Last week I finally completed a full 5 round 6 group 100 yard target for Elfster's thread with both my Colt CRP-18 .223 and LaRue OBR 5.56 18" barrel. I've had the Colt for about 6 months, and I just got the LaRue. I intended on selling the Colt, but so far, I have not been able to get the LaRue to outperform it. I've been spending the majority of my range time on my bolt guns, so I haven't really shot the Colt all that much. I figured doing the 100 yard challenge would be the best way to find out which rifle works best. I took them both out the weekend before last right after getting the LaRue. My buddy and I both shot groups with them. I will post pics from then and from last week when doing the 100 yard challenge.
Here's a description of both rifles:
LaRue OBR 5.56
Barrel: 18" - 1:8 twist
Scope: Vortex Razor 5-20, Mil/Mil
Mount: American Rifle Company M10 QD-L
Trigger: Geissele SSA Two-stage
Colt CRP-18 .223 Wylde
Barrel" 18" - 1:8 twist
Scope: SWFA 5-20 Mil/mil
Mount: Burris REPR (I know...cheap tires on a cadillac...but it works)
Trigger: Geissele SSA-E
If you were to read the specs on both you'd see they are basically the same rifle with a couple of exceptions. The Geissele two stage is a solid feeling trigger that you can feel both stages on. The SSA-E is called a two stage, but I only notice one stage. It's easier to smoothly pull the SSA-E compared to the true two stage. But I don't see that making a huge difference. The other difference is the chambering. 5.56 for the LaRue and .223 Wylde for the Colt. They both can fire the 5.56 and .223, but for the purposes of my tests I used 5.56 ammo for the LaRue and .223 ammo for the Colt.
These are pictures from 6/29/13 when my buddy and I both shot each rifle. The LaRue had approximately 70 rounds down the tube when these were taken, so I attributed the crappy groups to not being broken in yet. I was also trying some new shooting techniques that I had learned in a thread I started about "driving" gas guns and "loading bipods", but I did not use a bipod. These were shot with front and back bags from a cement bench. I was using Black Hills OTM 77gr. The pic is mine and the 2nd is my buddy. Elfster had suggested letting a buddy shoot the LaRue to see if he was getting something different to rule out any variables. There are only 4 groups of each.
My Groups
LaRue avg: 2.271
Colt avg: .965

My Buddy's Groups
LaRue avg: 2.987
Colt avg: 1.593

I went out on July 3 and did the full 6 group 100 yard challenge with both of the rifles at the same time. I alternated shooting 3 groups with each rifle until all 12 were shot. I used the same Black Hills OTM 77gr ammo. 5.56 for the LaRue and .223 for the Colt. More information had been posted in my "drive gas gun/load bipod" thread, namely from Lowlight, and I was applying some of it this day. So slightly altering a shooting technique is another variable to add to this equation. However, as you can see, it did not effect the Colt as much as it did the LaRue. Another factor, I had ran 200 additional rounds through the Larue prior to this trip to the range. So at this point, the LaRue had about 300 rounds and should be considered broken in. The Colt had around 500.
Colt Avg: .978

LaRue Avg: 1.68
Also note, as per Elfster's 100 yd challenge rules, all flyers count. There was one really bad flyer, or more likely just me yipping the shot because I was on my last group and pissed off (top right hand group), so that one shot opened the group up to 3.542, which was considerably outside the standard deviation of the groups. So I've assumed I used a measurement as if I had hit the dead center of the target which would've made that group be 1.322, and used that to get the 1.68 avg. Otherwise, the average would be 2.05, and I don't think that is a realistic measurement for purposes of this discussion.

One of the first things Elfster brought up was scope/mount, and to possibly remount the scope and shoot all over again to see if that was the problem. I don't think that is the problem. It's a Vortex Razor mounted in an American Rifle Company one piece quality mount. I took this off of my .308 bolt gun and put directly onto the LaRue without taking the scope out of the rings. Below is a picture of groups shot with the .308, and this is using remanufactured ammo from freedom munitions. The rifle is capable of much better, but this should negate the scope issue variable (or at least I think it does).

So here's where I'm at so far. I'm going back out on Saturday to see what else I can do with it. One thing I haven't played with yet is the gas adjustment. Fine tuning it could close the groups in a bit, but I've never adjusted the Colt. Also, LaRue recommends using FGMM 77gr, and I've been using Black Hills match 77gr stuff. I'll try to get my hands on a couple of boxes of FGMM to test with, but I can't imagine that alone closing the groups nearly .75" to get them into the guaranteed sub MOA accuracy LaRue touts. The other variable is the bore. I usually clean the bore after a trip to the range, but I did not clean either one before the 7/3 trip. Both rifles had at least 100 rounds of carbon and copper build up in the bore going to the range.
As I'm sure you can tell, I'm one of the newer guys that's here to learn. There are plenty of things I think I know, but I'm not going to put those out here right now. I'm open to feedback from you more experienced guys on what could be causing this.