There is plenty of anti drone tech, they just don’t have it, yet.
I’m cool with less tanks in the world either way, infantry wins wars.
I’m cool with less tanks in the world either way, infantry wins wars.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!
Create a channel Learn morePeople still think it was German tanks that did so much damage to Russia. But no body knows that Germany had 3,000 air kills in the first three days of operation Barbarossa. Germany ran into tons of places where using tanks did nothing. But with total air supremacy they could take out enemy positions with the luftwaffe.Two words: Air Superiority
Armor has ALWAYS been at the mercy of who controls the air this is nothing new
People still think it was German tanks that did so much damage to Russia. But no body knows that Germany had 3,000 air kills in the first three days of operation Barbarossa. Germany ran into tons of places where using tanks did nothing. But with total air supremacy they could take out enemy positions with the luftwaffe.
People still think it was German tanks that did so much damage to Russia. But no body knows that Germany had 3,000 air kills in the first three days of operation Barbarossa. Germany ran into tons of places where using tanks did nothing. But with total air supremacy they could take out enemy positions with the luftwaffe.
I beg to differ. Pretty sure the Enoly Gay won the War in the Pacific for us ALL.Fun fact, Germany lost that war and were pounded back 1,150 miles by artillery. Air Power has yet to win a war.
Well after we dropped the second one I'm pretty sure The Bomb(s) convinced them to quitArtillery doesn't win wars and the atomic bombs aren't why Japan surrendered.
Their complete lack of raw materials, their fleets, air power, fighting aged men, and the unwinnability of the war meant that Japan was already on the verge of announcing their surrender. We decided Japan was an easy target to display the power of our atomic weapons. Also, we chose the Christian region of Japan for one of the bombs, aimed the bomb at a church as a landmark, and killed almost every single Christian on the island of Japan. How Christian of us.Well after we dropped the second one I'm pretty sure The Bomb(s) convinced them to quit
Their complete lack of raw materials, their fleets, air power, fighting aged men, and the unwinnability of the war meant that Japan was already on the verge of announcing their surrender. We decided Japan was an easy target to display the power of our atomic weapons. Also, we chose the Christian region of Japan for one of the bombs, aimed the bomb at a church as a landmark, and killed almost every single Christian on the island of Japan. How Christian of us.
Stalin didn’t call artillery the God of War without cause. I should clarify. Artillery wins industrial land wars and similar.Artillery doesn't win wars and the atomic bombs aren't why Japan surrendered.
The emperors will was broken as of 26 July.Well after we dropped the second one I'm pretty sure The Bomb(s) convinced them to quit
I was in Okinawa around 82" and I remember my dad asking me what the island was like when I was home on leave.Their complete lack of raw materials, their fleets, air power, fighting aged men, and the unwinnability of the war meant that Japan was already on the verge of announcing their surrender. We decided Japan was an easy target to display the power of our atomic weapons. Also, we chose the Christian region of Japan for one of the bombs, aimed the bomb at a church as a landmark, and killed almost every single Christian on the island of Japan. How Christian of us.
Artillery opened up and stopped the column. Then the Apaches did the killing. Hellfires for tanks, 30mm HE for all the Infantry on the ground. 70+ unrecognizable is what I heard, and at lest 250 dead.Except that artillery is the King of Battle.
That Marine artillery battery taught the Russian mercenary battalion and their armored vehicles this lesson a few years ago In Syria.
MacArthur was insane. He had this idea that we had to physically seize Japan and kill every person who opposed us. An island with almost no raw resources and few fighting men left, who we could have shelled from the sea for years if we wanted. This is the same psychopath that wanted enough nuclear weapons to kill every person in China and North Korea for daring to fight us.For the million Americans figured to die or be wounded if MacArthur had his way but instead lived, I will shed no tears.
The Japanese military wanted to fight on. Even had a coup and attempted to hijack the Emperor.
Sure the bomb was as much a message to the Russians as the Japanese, perhaps in addition to saving our Pacific troops it prevented us fighting the Russians in '46.
Too bad we had so many spies working within our borders to allow the cocksuckers almost instant parity.
Patton and Tail Gunner Joe were right.
Aircraft are the wrong tool for counter battery fire.Gee wiz, I wonder what advancing forces used to take out enemy artillery with. View attachment 7437075View attachment 7437076View attachment 7437081
So uh...did we win that one?Artillery was so important when we invaded Afghanistan, we didn't even risk bringing them ashore. Those howitzers were made of gold or some shit.
He wasnt really wrong about China.MacArthur was insane. He had this idea that we had to physically seize Japan and kill every person who opposed us. An island with almost no raw resources and few fighting men left, who we could have shelled from the sea for years if we wanted. This is the same psychopath that wanted enough nuclear weapons to kill every person in China and North Korea for daring to fight us.
We needed to win the war. We didn’t need to kill hundreds of thousands of people to display a weapon in a nation we knew were on the verge of surrender. You can not justify to me that we are in the right for immolating people who had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, simply for being Japanese. That’s a very simplistic way of looking at war. OUR team are the GOOD guys and everything we do is RIGHT. Anyone whois against us are the BAD guys and nothing too bad can happen to them.
I guess we’ll see how quickly they starve themselves to death? Again? Again... again... someday that dam will do what his nukes would have done.He wasnt really wrong about China.
MacArthur was insane. He had this idea that we had to physically seize Japan and kill every person who opposed us. An island with almost no raw resources and few fighting men left, who we could have shelled from the sea for years if we wanted. This is the same psychopath that wanted enough nuclear weapons to kill every person in China and North Korea for daring to fight us.
We needed to win the war. We didn’t need to kill hundreds of thousands of people to display a weapon in a nation we knew were on the verge of surrender. You can not justify to me that we are in the right for immolating people who had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, simply for being Japanese. That’s a very simplistic way of looking at war. OUR team are the GOOD guys and everything we do is RIGHT. Anyone whois against us are the BAD guys and nothing too bad can happen to them.
You'd shit if I told where the lab for all of this was located.On the tunnel aspect.
Army Is Spending Half a Billion to Train Soldiers to Fight Underground
The Army is training and equipping 26 of its 31 combat brigades for subterranean warfare.www.military.com
You'd shit if I told where the lab for all of this was located.
Finally something you've said about military tactics that's based on realityYou guys think drones will be buzzing around unimpeded when the EW guys get to take all the safeties off? Cute.
Anyone talking about laser effectiveness has no experience with lasers. If you want to disrupt laser guidance, that might work great. But there is no laser that can be powered from a vehicle, or even from most static systems, that can cut through any appreciable amount of material. Maybe you could kill a guidance system if you got lucky. When industrial lasers of the 3KW range are cutting through 3/4" steel with a focal distance of 4 inches, with the application of cutting oxygen, that works great. Now shoot that same laser over several miles, at a fast moving target with a constantly changing focal distance, with mirage and all the deficits of optics, and you aren't doing jack. If you could even physically put a light transmission through the mirage at the thing you're aiming at, the beam would be so large a diameter and so scattered by atmosphere that it wouldn't cut. Planes are slower but it's the same thing. It isn't where you're aiming.
Those same Kurd slaughtering militias where on US payroll a 2013-2017 out of total of 41 groups Turks are using 28 were part of the US programs Timber Sycamore and Train and Equip, before US cut the funding and Turks took over. Kurds are just another tribe of corrupt goatfuckers, lionising they get from the media is just good old fashioned propaganda.
Only good thing is Pentagon and CIA suck at training monkeys ........500 something Mio $ later
Things you think you know out of Syria are all propaganda.
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/09/23/syria-leaks-uk-contractors-opposition-media/
Happen to have pretty a useless Military science degree .
Isn't it funny that the people talking the most about what or who is the king of battle or whatever never served in any capacity, let alone deploy somewhere where they needed to do shit?Artillery was so important when we invaded Afghanistan, we didn't even risk bringing them ashore. Those howitzers were made of gold or some shit.
Get the fuck out of here with your pussy ass revisionism. Seriously. Get the fuck out.MacArthur was insane. He had this idea that we had to physically seize Japan and kill every person who opposed us. An island with almost no raw resources and few fighting men left, who we could have shelled from the sea for years if we wanted. This is the same psychopath that wanted enough nuclear weapons to kill every person in China and North Korea for daring to fight us.
We needed to win the war. We didn’t need to kill hundreds of thousands of people to display a weapon in a nation we knew were on the verge of surrender. You can not justify to me that we are in the right for immolating people who had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, simply for being Japanese. That’s a very simplistic way of looking at war. OUR team are the GOOD guys and everything we do is RIGHT. Anyone whois against us are the BAD guys and nothing too bad can happen to them.
Please tell us about your military serviceAircraft are the wrong tool for counter battery fire.
So uh...did we win that one?
You sound like a 22 year old It/They/Them Marxist Arts Theorist saying “Not my President!!!” to the parts of history that you don’t like.Get the fuck out of here with your pussy ass revisionism. Seriously. Get the fuck out.
No not really.
No he doesn't, in reality you sound like a Cuck for trying to rewrite shit into the script.You sound like a 22 year old It/They/Them Marxist Arts Theorist saying “Not my President!!!” to the parts of history that you don’t like.
You realize that the Japanese population was training to fight us for every inch of Japan. As soon as the first boot hit sand every single one of our POWs was going to be killed. It wasn't to uncommon for the Japanese to eat killed POWs. They still say nanking never happened, to this day. If you aren't familiar with nanking, a nazi had to walk the streets stopping war crimes. Many more people would have been killed if we invaded, millions. And no I don't care about them, it would have been thousands of us.MacArthur was insane. He had this idea that we had to physically seize Japan and kill every person who opposed us. An island with almost no raw resources and few fighting men left, who we could have shelled from the sea for years if we wanted. This is the same psychopath that wanted enough nuclear weapons to kill every person in China and North Korea for daring to fight us.
We needed to win the war. We didn’t need to kill hundreds of thousands of people to display a weapon in a nation we knew were on the verge of surrender. You can not justify to me that we are in the right for immolating people who had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, simply for being Japanese. That’s a very simplistic way of looking at war. OUR team are the GOOD guys and everything we do is RIGHT. Anyone whois against us are the BAD guys and nothing too bad can happen to them.
You sound like a 22 year old It/They/Them Marxist Arts Theorist saying “Not my President!!!” to the parts of history that you don’t like.
He's an idiot. Probably living in his parents basement.308 pirate, I mentioned the navies laser program and it went right over his head.
Yes I understand that. I’m familiar with Nanking. It might be the worst genocide I can think of? The medical experiments were particularly horrifying. The Japanese found ways to make auschwitz and dachau look tame.You realize that the Japanese population was training to fight us for every inch of Japan. As soon as the first boot hit sand every single one of our POWs was going to be killed. It wasn't to uncommon for the Japanese to eat killed POWs. They still say nanking never happened, to this day. If you aren't familiar with nanking, a nazi had to walk the streets stopping war crimes. Many more people would have been killed if we invaded, millions. And no I don't care about them, it would have been thousands of us.
So you think you're a laser weapons expert because you work with industrial laser cutters?
Dude, stay in your lane
And that's just a crude prototype
I didn’t say anything ‘revisionist’. My opinion is that the war could have ended in a much less costly way.The only revisionist here is you. Did you have the same kind of revulsion against our carpet bombing of German and Japanese cities with conventional explosives?
You sound like a pussy who doesn't know how to win wars.
The Japs got what they got for starting a world fucking war.
I didn’t say anything ‘revisionist’. My opinion is that the war could have ended in a much less costly way.
I don’t know how to win wars. I’ve never won one.Costly for whom? The Japanese of 1945?
Fuck them. The price they paid is irrelevant.
Like I said, you clearly don't know how to win wars.
Once again, you don't know shit from shinola about war.I don’t think we should confuse revenge with winning a war. It worked, no doubt.