Hey,
Just to be clear on your post...for rimfires... you are saying the lock time between a bolt and a semi is substantial enough that you should not consider a semi over a bolt rifle?
I would argue that, for rimfire, that the slow bullet speed FAR outweighs the perceived/actual lock time of the action...
Good points tho as the semi AR center fire you absolutely have to focus more on fundamentals/consistency...I think it is downplayed in the rimfire world due to the exponentially slower ammo...
Thoughts?
DT
If you want every available advantage for positional shooting (ie NRL22, etc), then yes, 100%.
If you take shooters with the EXACT same skill level, put one with a bolt and one with an auto, the bolt will ALWAYS, 100% of the time win over the long run.
Of course, in other disciplines that place pure speed over accuracy this may be different, I'm talking in the context of NRL22 and like sports.
About your argument on slow bbl time..... it is entirely negated.
The slow barrel time is the SAME for BOTH guns (bolt and semi.....with same bbl. lengths), so the lock time disadvantage is the SAME for a rimfire as for a centerfire....you still have to hold the gun perfectly still 3 to 4 times longer AFTER the trigger is pulled to make the same shot.
I know Kidd triggers have fast lock times, but they are still 3-4 times slower than a striker fired bolt gun.
It is impossible for a hammer swinging through an arc, then accelerating a stationary firing pin to compete with a simple firing pin dropped directly on a primer.
And please don't think I'm poo-pooing semi's, I probably have 35 or 40 of them in many flavors and enjoy them all!!
Last edited: