Re: how fast can you change a mag?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mgd45</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Lindy,
Great post. A few years ago a co-worker & I went to a nearby rnage where they hold ISPC matches on the weekends. We were the only LEO's there at the time, & I had a total blast with all the shootings. During a break, one of the other shooters asked me if I thought this was "good training" for LEO's.
I told him that the only aspect of this I found useful for training purposes was how this type of shooting really makes you better at handling your pistol, manipulating the controls, moving while shooting, shooting from cover...etc...HOWEVER.....
It was not good training in that in the real world we don't get 5 minutes to walk through a "building" to see where all the targets are situated & then run through as fast as we can blasting at any man sized looking target.....LOL! </div></div>
This may get a little rant like so please don't take it personally. I would just like to use your comment to make a point.
Your statement leads me to think that competition shooting only improves your gunhandling, manipulations, shooting on the move, etc. etc. but those skills are somehow negated by seeing the course of fire before hand.
The fact is that once I have built my skill level with manipulation, handling, moving, drawing, reloading etc. etc. to an unconcsciously competent level, I have now created a larger capacity to deal with the tactical problem at hand. In doing so I have exponentially increased my chances to dominate that encounter.
In my experience there are very many people who look down upon the competition shooting (IPSC, USPSA, IDPA, etc.) as not being helpful from a defensive standpoint. Yet a good number of these same people lack the ability to perform fundamental skills at 100%. What any form of competition shooting gets you is multiple repetitions of fundamentals with a mild inducement of hormone related stress response. This is exactly the "stress inoculation" we always talk about. The only difference I am seeing is that so often we see a large gap between the skills shown by a competition shooter and ourselves and want to find comfort by pointing out that they aren't defensive enough . Instead of diminishing their accomplishments as "not defensive" why don't we take it as a challenge to bring that level of skill to the defensive or tactical realm.