This is what it would look like:
Quick disclaimer: <span style="font-weight: bold">The depicted FOV is not to scale. The text and bracket are not part of the reticle, just there for your reference.</span>
-I put the thick leg on top so as to not obscure game's front leg, which I view as critical for judging shot placement.
-The thick leg would be 4 MOA thick, or maybe even six, so as to be able to bracket an animal's vitals in poor light at relatively close range out too 100 yards or so.
-The thin parts would subtend .4 MOA. Fairly visible until really low light, yet doesn't obscure too much of the target for precise shot placement.
-Horizontal windage reference. Major at 2MOA intervals, with minors in-between. Elevation adjustments would be handled via turret.
Mil references would work just as well. Doesn't matter to me as long as the windage marks and the turret adjustments are the same.
For me, this would go in a high quality, yet light weight fixed 6x w/ a 42mm objective.
John
Quick disclaimer: <span style="font-weight: bold">The depicted FOV is not to scale. The text and bracket are not part of the reticle, just there for your reference.</span>
-I put the thick leg on top so as to not obscure game's front leg, which I view as critical for judging shot placement.
-The thick leg would be 4 MOA thick, or maybe even six, so as to be able to bracket an animal's vitals in poor light at relatively close range out too 100 yards or so.
-The thin parts would subtend .4 MOA. Fairly visible until really low light, yet doesn't obscure too much of the target for precise shot placement.
-Horizontal windage reference. Major at 2MOA intervals, with minors in-between. Elevation adjustments would be handled via turret.
Mil references would work just as well. Doesn't matter to me as long as the windage marks and the turret adjustments are the same.
For me, this would go in a high quality, yet light weight fixed 6x w/ a 42mm objective.
John