You would fancy yourself an intellectual.
Abortions are big business. Miscarriages are not. There is a follow the money angle and a Eugenics/satanic deal as well.
You don't see the duplicity in making these two statements in the same post.
Once more you feign ignorance in understanding that before every genocide the targeted group is legally dehumanized.
The constitution doesn't grant rights it only recognizes them. The fact that the 9th exists should dispell your disillusions.
Science says since a unique DNA strand has been created that produces cells that can split and replicate, a new and distinct life has been created. Since a fetus has different DNA and blood type with mom, and during pregnancy a mom's decidua produces special cytokines that biochemically hides the fetus from mom's immune system, lest it be attacked and killed as as invader should tell you everything you should know.
Then Jesus asked them, “Would anyone light a lamp and then put it under a basket or under a bed? Of course not! A lamp is placed on a stand, where its light will shine. Mark 4:21
This is where you declare you're stupidity. Unique DNA nessisarily means a different person.
You stupid ignorant fool. The constitution doesn't grant rights it only recoginzes rights that are inherent. You should go to Lowes or Hope Depot and buy an axe handle and use it to beat your mom until she she shits down both legs for raising you so poorly. I'd tell you to do the same to your dad, but the stats say you have no clue who he is.
It means potentially a different person where fertilized eggs are concerned. It is a developing person until it can function on its own. A fertilized chicken egg is not a chicken ... yet.
If i destroy a bald or golden eagle zygote, I'll end up in a federal court facing decades of prison. Tell me how a bird egg is elevated over a human.
Tell me why 66% of the federal budget goes to entitlement spending, programs which fund people who are ostensibly adults who supposedly can't survive w/o feeding off of others.
Helping is laughable. Ask any attorney or judge what percentage of sentencing reports they have read where the defendant comes from a stable two parent home.
I'll be generous and assume you're just playing dumb here. If you're too stupid to not actually understand legal dehumanization precedes every genocide and truly believe this group is functionally different than the next, you're beyond hope.
" ... but never with any real content, just tropes and sound bites.
So you can claim you don't understand, yet again?Your head is so far up your own ass it's tickling your tonsils.
You think you're "enlightened" because you "think" you're the only one who sees the "big picture" behind the "conspiracy".
Forest <> trees <> bushes <> leaves on the bushes <> window screen <> dirt on the window screen <> you, thinking you see something nobody else sees
Let me know when you think you might be able to actually stay on topic for at least one, maybe two posts.
When past democrats were told it was wrong to horse whip a lazy slave or hang a rebellious one, they were almost universally told that by people who didn't even have a slave.
Its a long read, but you seem like a guy who will dig in... https://bibleapologetics.wordpress.com/slavery-in-the-bible-25/
He's too dumb to understand the correlation of slaves having no rights and the unborn having no rights.
Now you're getting repetitive.
I guess the point is that the servitude described in the Bible is not directly equivalent to the chattel slavery of the African slave trade that I assume you were referencing. You must look at the subject in its cultural context. From a more theological perspective, I tend to think that the purpose of the law was not to prescribe an archetype for purely moral behavior, but a set of pragmatic regulations designed to protect Israel (God's chosen people), and show them how hopeless it was to try and please God through works. God's efforts are not political nor legal in nature. He is not a social reformer. His efforts as described holistically in the Biblical text are an effort to change men's hearts.
Like killing a baby to avoid the consequences of being a filthy road whore?
Good point... To be a bit more precise, I don't believe God's primary focus is promoting change through political means. He's not really trying to
You seem to need to have the last say as a balm for your poor self esteem. Even if it's making identical posts four times.
I'll concede your point about belief in God vs belief the Bible is the Word of God as well. Its certainly possible to believe in a creator God, even the Christian God, but not believe the Bible, as we know it, is His complete and inerrant Word.
