Sure they can. And will.And if they don’t have a warrant or exigent circumstances they can’t enter.
Then afterwards, when you're probably dead, they'll say "oops!"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestSure they can. And will.And if they don’t have a warrant or exigent circumstances they can’t enter.
Please explain.
I would be hesitant if not even more suspicious if the police DID announce themselves. For someone like that guy who has no beef with the police and never has, me personally would think its criminal thugs announcing themselves as police to get in and get the upper hand. I would think there is absolutely no reason the police would ever be there to begin with. Anyone can yell "police". The whole situation and way it operates is bad.
You say "go away", and they huff and they puff and they blow your house down.
Maybe they kick the door in right then and there, maybe after half the county shows up for the "barricaded suspect" roll out.
Right, wrong or "you can't do that" doesn't enter into it.
I don't expect cops to take suicidal risks, I do expect them to take calculated risks to life and limb even when it's the other guy who created the bad situation. If they aren't willing to put life and limb on the line to help people they need to find another job.What trumps what depends on who created the unsafe situation.
They might shoot you anyway.OK, say you’re right, and I don’t open the door. And they kick it in and I’m just standing there unarmed. Then what?
Breonna Taylor's family got 12M; I'm assuming this one will be double, or at last 20M, due to inflation. Of course, its the taxpayers that pay those settlements, not the PD's or SWAT teams. No accountability. Charge the shooting officer with murder and everyone involved as accomplices. Make sure awarding juries are aware of their taxes that go "for the cause" too.Change my mind.Not going to stop,until settlements come out of police pensions.
They might shoot you anyway.
But they take you with them, for all sorts of reasons. The "oops" will come eventually. Maybe that day,maybe two years later.
"oopsie"
If the Airman was white - we would never have even heard of it.
My bet would be that it happens way more often than any level of government would want the citizens to know about.Well we did hear (briefly) about the Head of Arkansas Airport Head that got taken out by alphabet (ATF or FBI)? And no body cameras for that one, no paperwork, and no multi-milion dollar settlement to be won.
What about that handicapped white guy in the trailor that got shot? Disabled vet in pre-dawn raid? I wonder how many of these happen that we never hear about.
Or out of their budget . If they have to fire someone cause they can't make payroll or cut back on the 5 million hours of overtime things may change.Not going to stop,until settlements come out of police pensions.
I may have read that wrongly, but my dog will let me know if someone is approaching the front or rear door and if you cover the peephole I can't tell if you are part of a unit or a bad guy. The storm door gets locked and then the entry door is locked and dead bolted, You're going to make a lot of racket getting into my house and you're going to piss him off.OK but the deputy DID announce and did NOT push the door.
I feel better now. Somehow I knew that you would come through with the perfect thing to say.You guys are also acting just like the liberals on gun control and such. Making a big deal about shit that doesn't happen very often.
Many of you are the first to point out that rifles are used far less than other types of guns.....yet the liberals go after them because they are ignorant.
What you guys do when constantly posting about police shootings is the exact same. Only about 1,000 people are killed per year by police. And of those 1,000, not even 10% are questionable shootings.
You are just being manipulated by the exact same type of media you harp on liberals being manipulated by it. The media tells them scary guns are bad and they believe it even thought the math doesn't back it up. The media you guys listen to tells you cops are making bad shoots all the time and you believe it.
You're making posts with titles like "this shit has to end" like it's happening a lot. It's extremely rare. There are more than 50 million police interactions with the public per year. And 1,000 of them end with someone dead.
Stop parroting what the media tells you and look at facts. Like you always point out the liberals don't do.
No charges no disciplinary actions for the Acorn assassins ; because they violated no department policy.. wonder if this is within policy
Bang bang bang bang bang bang! Drop the gun!looks like he doesn't even have index finger in trigger guard. about as non threatening as one could be and still have a gun in possesion. just from this pic,sure looks like murder 1. if shot fired immediately after this pic,then no command to drop it. police crime should be upped a level and punishment should very upped. police are allowed weapons easily accessed which most places citizens aren't. police are allowed to use of deadly force. most places citizens have to go thru a lot more to prove correct action when they use it. police can easily summon armed overwhelming armed assistance. they get all kinds of protections when they use it. they have no legal costs,$ judgments are usually paid by their employers-the tax payers.
So it is true- no disciplinary action or charges - resigning is not a disciplinary action. Not when one’s pension is in tact .That’s untrue. The deputy who started firing after hearing the acorn went through an IA which found he violated department policy and he resigned (likely in lieu of being fired). He was not charged with a crime though, presumably because the guy he shot at was not hit or harmed. The other deputy who fired did not violate policy per the IA because she was reacting to the other deputy’s action and believed shots had been fired.
So it is true- no disciplinary action or charges - resigning is not a disciplinary action. Not when one’s pension is in tact .
And along with a sternly worded letter he probably knows better now than to mag dump a car and neighborhood over paranoid delusional fantasiesHis disciplinary action was termination. He chose to resign. It reports differently in the state database for law enforcement standards (the eligibility system).
Disappointed!!On a separate subject, here are a few options that people should consider if they are in a similar situation with someone banging on door announcing themselves as police and you have no idea why:
- Just ignore the door. They need a warrant or an exigent circumstance exception to warrant for them to come in without your consent.
- Speak to them through the door. Inform them you're not sure what's going on and ask which department or agency they are with. Inform them you are calling that particular LE and verifying they have a unit at your door. Once confirmed, you can decide if you want to interact with them or not.
- Keep the weapon in the small of your back or somewhere easily accessible should you need it. Crack door open and talk to them. Once verified it's legit, if you choose to let them in, inform the officer/agent where the firearm is and keep your hands visible.
Answering the door with gun in hand is obviously absolutely legal. However, it's not a very good idea at all. Even if the shooting turns out to be illegal, you're still dead. And more than likely, while you posed no threat in reality......given the way events played out, it's going to be very hard to say beyond a reasonable doubt the officer/agent shouldn't have shot him. Obviously he was "wrong" when you have time to go over things after. But that's not how the law and such works. You have to take only what's going on in that small snapshot in time.
Like many things in life, there are things that are absolutely "legal" to do but also not a good idea.
For example, if you are crossing the street in a marked pedestrian crosswalk that either does not have signals, or the signal is allowing you to cross.....and there is a car speeding towards you..........you're perfectly legal to continue crossing. But, it's quite a bad idea to do this.
Haven't watched the video and don't need to. I've seen plenty of qualified immunity protected homicides.Uniform hangers will continue to do this so long as they are pretty much untouchable and none of the good folks actually get off their asses and make a change.
Primaries are the perfect time to vote out politicians that protect uniform hangers.
Repeatedly Trump has vowed to increase police “indemnification” as a campaign promise:
“One such promise: "We're going to give our police their power back," he told rallygoers in Waukesha, "and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."”
I always preach this about driving. Minimize risk at any opportunity even if you legally shouldn't have to.On a separate subject, here are a few options that people should consider if they are in a similar situation with someone banging on door announcing themselves as police and you have no idea why:
- Just ignore the door. They need a warrant or an exigent circumstance exception to warrant for them to come in without your consent.
- Speak to them through the door. Inform them you're not sure what's going on and ask which department or agency they are with. Inform them you are calling that particular LE and verifying they have a unit at your door. Once confirmed, you can decide if you want to interact with them or not.
- Keep the weapon in the small of your back or somewhere easily accessible should you need it. Crack door open and talk to them. Once verified it's legit, if you choose to let them in, inform the officer/agent where the firearm is and keep your hands visible.
Answering the door with gun in hand is obviously absolutely legal. However, it's not a very good idea at all. Even if the shooting turns out to be illegal, you're still dead. And more than likely, while you posed no threat in reality......given the way events played out, it's going to be very hard to say beyond a reasonable doubt the officer/agent shouldn't have shot him. Obviously he was "wrong" when you have time to go over things after. But that's not how the law and such works. You have to take only what's going on in that small snapshot in time.
Like many things in life, there are things that are absolutely "legal" to do but also not a good idea.
For example, if you are crossing the street in a marked pedestrian crosswalk that either does not have signals, or the signal is allowing you to cross.....and there is a car speeding towards you..........you're perfectly legal to continue crossing. But, it's quite a bad idea to do this.
“This tragic incident should have never occurred,” [Sheriff] Aden said in the statement. “The objective facts do not support the use of deadly force as an appropriate response to Mr. Fortson’s actions. Mr. Fortson did not commit any crime. By all accounts, he was an exceptional airman and individual.”
One of the King's men got fired for murdering an innocent man?Deputy is fired.
![]()
Florida sheriff’s office fires deputy who fatally shot Black airman at home
A Florida sheriff on Friday fired a deputy who fatally shot a Black airman at his home while holding a handgun pointed to the ground.www.atlantanewsfirst.com