Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only things kac made on the entire rifle are upper/lower, the suppressor, and maybe the bcg, maybe.
I'll never understand why people will pay what they do for those rifles. Admittedly my experience is the $50k m110 rifles. They were absolutely garbage. Very inconsistent, poorly suited to the task, accuracy was mediocre, reliability wasn't there. The list of problems were a mile long. They sent us "sniper rifles" with mil spec triggers, stocks without adjustment, cans that would carbon weld themselves to the barrel in a single range trip, accuracy somewhere between 1 and 3 moa depending on the particular rifle, and a host of other problems. They weren't any better than something you could get from PSA or some of the other low end rifle manufacturers, in fact, they might not have been that good.Uhhh, what?
That’s a KAC made rifle with a KAC can. Yeah it’s got a magpul buttstock, grip, and sights and the optics package doesn’t have any components from them but everything else is KAC.
I'll never understand why people will pay what they do for those rifles. Admittedly my experience is the $50k m110 rifles. They were absolutely garbage. Very inconsistent, poorly suited to the task, accuracy was mediocre, reliability wasn't there. The list of problems were a mile long. They sent us "sniper rifles" with mil spec triggers, stocks without adjustment, cans that would carbon weld themselves to the barrel in a single range trip, accuracy somewhere between 1 and 3 moa depending on the particular rifle, and a host of other problems. They weren't any better than something you could get from PSA or some of the other low end rifle manufacturers, in fact, they might not have been that good.
I was one one of the first snipers to put my hands on them back in 2009. My unit had them way before most of the army.This is your response to that?
I highly doubt you have ever handled an M110 first of all. Second KAC are excellent rifles and top tier. No they are not worth what most idiots will pay for them, but they are far better than any POS that has ever left PSA's door.
You clearly don't have a clue WTF you're talking about as usual because M110's are not and were not ever $50K. Not even for the full system, and not close to what the military paid. The 2013 FY Army contract put them at $11,214 EA for the system. Even if you add the 2018 contract to have 1725 of them them overhauled ($9,594 EA) they only ad up to $20,808 EA.
You should post less, your entire post is even more laughable than your previous.
I was one one of the first snipers to put my hands on them back in 2009. My unit had them way before most of the army.
Look how angry you are about something that you don't know anything about. Those systems cost $40,xxx when they sent us the deployment kits. I know because I saw the invoices.
Don't worry about what or how much I post. I'll bet you'd be far less mouthy in person keyboard badass. Go ride your bicycle BMX boy.
This is what kak sold the kit to civilians for. It doesn't even have all of the shit we had. The kit they sold the army was well over $40k. You don't know what you're talking about. You're like most people on this forum, pretending to be an expert on shit you've never been involved in.
Use your Google fu and find the contract price for the bullshit they gave us in 2008. I can't find it anywhere, maybe you can.I literally posted a link containing the contract info. It lists the Army’s price along with all the contract info. You can look it up and see all the contract info on other sites too.
You post a link to a commercial sales company that’s known for inflating prices.
I bought a brand new M110 SASS kit from Vino on gunbroker about 10 years ago in the coffin case with optic and everything except the can (didn’t want it, could have bought one for another $1Kish) for $9500 and he had like 10 of the things available
Fuck your dumb.
They gave it the KAC treatment - the heavy barrel with dimples goes back ~10 years or more and while notably absent has been recently seen with 6.5CM SR-25 uppers and the KS-1/L403A1. The dimple pattern is KAC’s. Marvin has permission to use it or licenses it from KAC, after all he is ex-KAC. What’s to say? It’s a heavy taper barrel with dimples behind the gas block - the base 13.7” KS-1 rifle weighs more than the 16” skinny barrel rifle.I'd like to learn more about this "Heavy Mass Barrel" looks to have the Marvin Makeover.
I'm looking at the same thing you are, and all I can tell you is that isn't correct. The deployment kits they sent us were over $40k. What you're looking at isn't as simple as you think it is. It's a depreciation sheet showing multi-year breakdowns. It's a language I don't speak. I'm sure there is a former pog here somewhere that can make sense of it.Here you go retard. $11,495 per kit in 2007, even the $15,300 price with ammunition and testing, spotting scope kit and everything doesn’t come close to your $50K claim. You are so full of shit you can’t see straight, the only poser fuck here is you.
What do you have to say now?
I'm looking at the same thing you are, and all I can tell you is that isn't correct. The deployment kits they sent us were over $40k. What you're looking at isn't as simple as you think it is. It's a depreciation sheet showing multi-year breakdowns. It's a language I don't speak. I'm sure there is a former pog here somewhere that can make sense of it.
By the way, they definitely didn't come with a spotting scope, and I doubt very seriously they came with any ammo, at least not that I recall. We shot m118lr, and I've shot enough through them to build you a park to jump your bicycle over.
They sent the deployment kits to us around March 2009, and within a week of them arriving we had a 2 day familiarization class with a rep from knights armament in a classroom at Battallion Headquarters. I remember the rep was apologizing for the shit they sent us in the first 10 minutes of the briefing. He said "this isn't the rifle we wanted to send you, it's the rifle the army wanted", and he said it a dozen times in two days. They weren't even happy with what they gave us..
You're seriously saying that the actual US Army budget book on their official government website is wrong? You cannot be fucking serious.
This is a picture of my sniper school graduation. I hesitate to share this because I know there are posers out there like you who will try to pretend you are one of the people in this picture. At least a third of these guys aren't alive anymore, maybe more, I'm not exactly sure. I am on the left of center, back row with the m24. You'll see the date and that some of us have m24's, and some have m110 rifles. We all had a choice at that point because they hadn't forced us to send our m24's back in yet. That's the first generations of m110 rifles. I watched two fail during that 5 week course for reasons I can't remember and the students had to finish with loaner rifles. That class started with about 28 people and finished with about 11 graduates. There are at least a dozen people here on this forum who know me personally who can verify that I am who I say I am.
Now, shut your poser mouth bicycle boy.
@redneckbmxer24 Those figures on that sheet are in $1000 increments hence the 3 0's on top of the column. I looked at the M4 section and those numbers align with what we paid for the whole kits when I was a 1SG at Bragg.
Hey brothers I don’t know when they won all the contracts for the M110’s but I started filling large sling orders for them 2005. I also supplied slings for them in “trials “ circa 2004. I saw them or what looked like them in use circa 2005 in Iraq. I was Tactical Intervention from 1998 to 2018November of the same year I was in SF selection, followed by almost 18 months in the SFQC. By the time I got back to the sniper community they were getting ready for the 2010's to land and everybody was fucking thrilled to be able to leave those things in the armory.
Nobody who ever used one in the real world would pay what you pay for them. The only reason they carry the cost that they do is so posers like you can put on your camouflage pants on the weekend and go to your local range and hope someone will mistake you for a badass.
I'm not angry at all, I'm actually quite entertained pointing out what a supreme retard you are while thinking your akin to Einstein.
https://www.bidlink.net/news/2019/0...ed a,total estimated value” of $16,550,140.00.
They were designed in 2007 and started fielding them in 2008, a year before you claim to have an early one LOL. I didn't dig into what they cost in 2008, but I can guarantee you that they didn't get cheaper 5 years later.
Now what other wisdom does the fountain of bullshit have to spew?
Hey the contract price included everything in kit including some best of the time night visionI don't thing that's accurate but if that's the case and thats the price for the 1150 units 11,495 x 1000 = $9,995.65 each. Even less!
I’m pretty sure the original SASS production contract was awarded in 2005 after a 2004 solicitation. That’s the contract that would probably be definitive for your discussion.
Thats just for the rifle, and you see the scope is left blank as printed just for the rifle spotter ammo etc its $13K (15300000/1150)I don't thing that's accurate but if that's the case and thats the price for the 1150 units 11,495 x 1000 = $9,995.65 each. Even less!
I saw what you posted, but that was from fiscal year 2007. What you’re looking for is from fiscal year 2006 and possibly 2005. Army can’t enter into a contract without money appropriated (Anti-Deficiency Act) so the 2005 contract award had to have an appropriation from 2005.Yes I was incorrect on the dates. I posted pricing right off of Army’s website as well as the link to the budget book further down in the thread.
That still lists costs for 2007-2012… first page is FY cost at 15.3 then 15.0. Second breaks it down.I saw what you posted, but that was from fiscal year 2007. What you’re looking for is from fiscal year 2006 and possibly 2005. Army can’t enter into a contract without money appropriated (Anti-Deficiency Act) so the 2005 contract award had to have an appropriation from 2005.
You’re not catching what I’m throwing down. If you want onto win your internet argument, I’m fairly certain the initial contract award is going to be the dataset you need. Later, larger production runs usually have lower costs. That’s what you’re posting—a later production run.
Go read what I said half wit. I said the deployment kits. It was all together in a storm box, over $40k. I can't remember the exact number from 14 years ago.You mean like the price would have been in 2009 when he claims he was one of the first to receive them and claims came with a $50K price tag then?
See his post.
You mean like the price would have been in 2009 when he claims he was one of the first to receive them and claims came with a $50K price tag then?
See his post.
Good, that's who I thought you were. You've left no doubt for anyone here now.M110 kits don’t cost and never have cost $50K dumbass.