Lots of those tests remind me of a meme, dude crashes his car into wall and complains about the car’s performance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is not what I wrote. I wrote that the statistics don't matter if your rifle is not functioning or is unreliable. (Kind of like telling Michael J Fox that, statistically, only about 0.1% of the population has Parkinson's)... This was a statement in support of my follow on statement that it is more important that you insure functionality of the rifle that you are using- regardless of the roll mark.This is the kind of ignorant, non logical statements that people say to justify their cheap shit.
Well lets throw statistics out the window because anything can fail. We can play that game with any product and its equally retarded to try and do so.
That is not what I wrote. I wrote that the statistics don't matter if your rifle is not functioning or is unreliable. (Kind of like telling Michael J Fox that, statistically, only about 0.1% of the population has Parkinson's)... This was a statement in support of my follow on statement that it is more important that you insure functionality of the rifle that you are using- regardless of the roll mark.
The guy with the PSA blem that he has competed with it, trained with it, and remediated it if necessary, is miles ahead of the guy that bought a KAC and threw it in the safe unfired.
well that is going to ruffle some feathers
Could you elaborate on the specifics??
Interessen. Any more details? Frankly the SD rifles don’t really innovate at all. Just a lot of well done off the shelf style parts.
It’s having honest conversations like this that grow our knowledge.
I'm still waiting to hear the details all about how the Geissele Super Duty rifles "Shit The Bed"... For the time being I'm calling Bullshit!
Since I know many of you have questions and since @bigjake83 feels the need to defend the penis enlargement capabilities of the super duty he has in the safe, I will elaborate as much as I can.
I spent 6 years in SOF and then left the military to go overseas and do the things for a while.
While doing the things, one meets many interesting peoples, including some peoples who are using super duty rifles.
When one sits across the chow hall tables and listens to the bitching of the peoples who are using the super dutys to do the things about how the super dutys don't always do the things without shitting the bed, one is interested.
When one is interested as to how a super fucking expensive rifle bought on a classified contract is having problems where the rifle operates like it hasn't been lubed at all and then was shot for 500 rounds, one pays attention.
When the peoples go back to using their previous rifles because they FUCKING DEMANDED them back from the armory that is a statement. Especially when the previous rifles were heavy as fuck.
Basically what was happening was the rifles were lubed properly (most of these guys had been doing Tier 1 level stuff for at least a decade, so they know how to maintain their stuff, ok?) the rifles were acting like they weren't lubed and extremely fouled. Short stroking, not locking, jamming halfway closed on a round partially fed due to not enough force to close the bolt, etc. All manner of remedies were tried, and believe me, these folks could ask for and get any remedy, but the final remedy was to get rid of the "Super Doody". As far as could be discovered, it seemed that geissele built a super tight clearanced match gun that was so tight that as soon as you shot it a bit and got it around helos in the desert the particulate in the gun caused it to jam.
They are sweet range guns and display guns though, lol, and by now maybe Geissele has fixed their shit and the rifles at least run as well as a 500 dollar PSA blaster.
Oh, and lest anyone think I am bullshitting (@bigjake83 ) let me help you out a bit. Since the contract was classified for the rifles and I can't give you that, maybe this will help:
View attachment 7849964
Since I know many of you have questions and since @bigjake83 feels the need to defend the penis enlargement capabilities of the super duty he has in the safe, I will elaborate as much as I can.
I spent 6 years in SOF and then left the military to go overseas and do the things for a while.
While doing the things, one meets many interesting peoples, including some peoples who are using super duty rifles.
When one sits across the chow hall tables and listens to the bitching of the peoples who are using the super dutys to do the things about how the super dutys don't always do the things without shitting the bed, one is interested.
When one is interested as to how a super fucking expensive rifle bought on a classified contract is having problems where the rifle operates like it hasn't been lubed at all and then was shot for 500 rounds, one pays attention.
When the peoples go back to using their previous rifles because they FUCKING DEMANDED them back from the armory that is a statement. Especially when the previous rifles were heavy as fuck.
Basically what was happening was the rifles were lubed properly (most of these guys had been doing Tier 1 level stuff for at least a decade, so they know how to maintain their stuff, ok?) the rifles were acting like they weren't lubed and extremely fouled. Short stroking, not locking, jamming halfway closed on a round partially fed due to not enough force to close the bolt, etc. All manner of remedies were tried, and believe me, these folks could ask for and get any remedy, but the final remedy was to get rid of the "Super Doody". As far as could be discovered, it seemed that geissele built a super tight clearanced match gun that was so tight that as soon as you shot it a bit and got it around helos in the desert the particulate in the gun caused it to jam.
They are sweet range guns and display guns though, lol, and by now maybe Geissele has fixed their shit and the rifles at least run as well as a 500 dollar PSA blaster.
Oh, and lest anyone think I am bullshitting (@bigjake83 ) let me help you out a bit. Since the contract was classified for the rifles and I can't give you that, maybe this will help:
View attachment 7849964
I only posted that because people seem to think they are end and be all. An untested rig with nothing really great gets' slapped together and all of the sudden it's top shelf. I think it's funny and pathetic to be honest but no, definitely not on the 'I'll suck at Geiselles' dik' like some others. If you gave it to me, I'd sell it.Since I know many of you have questions and since @bigjake83 feels the need to defend the penis enlargement capabilities of the super duty he has in the safe, I will elaborate as much as I can.
I spent 6 years in SOF and then left the military to go overseas and do the things for a while.
While doing the things, one meets many interesting peoples, including some peoples who are using super duty rifles.
When one sits across the chow hall tables and listens to the bitching of the peoples who are using the super dutys to do the things about how the super dutys don't always do the things without shitting the bed, one is interested.
When one is interested as to how a super fucking expensive rifle bought on a classified contract is having problems where the rifle operates like it hasn't been lubed at all and then was shot for 500 rounds, one pays attention.
When the peoples go back to using their previous rifles because they FUCKING DEMANDED them back from the armory that is a statement. Especially when the previous rifles were heavy as fuck.
Basically what was happening was the rifles were lubed properly (most of these guys had been doing Tier 1 level stuff for at least a decade, so they know how to maintain their stuff, ok?) the rifles were acting like they weren't lubed and extremely fouled. Short stroking, not locking, jamming halfway closed on a round partially fed due to not enough force to close the bolt, etc. All manner of remedies were tried, and believe me, these folks could ask for and get any remedy, but the final remedy was to get rid of the "Super Doody". As far as could be discovered, it seemed that geissele built a super tight clearanced match gun that was so tight that as soon as you shot it a bit and got it around helos in the desert the particulate in the gun caused it to jam.
They are sweet range guns and display guns though, lol, and by now maybe Geissele has fixed their shit and the rifles at least run as well as a 500 dollar PSA blaster.
Oh, and lest anyone think I am bullshitting (@bigjake83 ) let me help you out a bit. Since the contract was classified for the rifles and I can't give you that, maybe this will help:
View attachment 7849964
really? how soI'm not questioning your military service, nor do I really care. But you specifically stated you had "first-hand knowledge" of how the geissele SD "Shit the Bed" when in fact all you're doing is regurgitating some complaints you heard.
What year was this?
Geissele is not a Gucci firearm by any means, it is however a step above BCM and DD.
You get tunnel time?
you sir are easily the most arrogant guy on this board. For a long time I laugh at how you position your posts as if you're some kind of authority. I got news for you sport, this isn't rocket science and no one gives a shit how you think and especially so since you come off like a real prick with a super small dik and you suffer from an inferiority complex. We get it, laughed at in bed, not the smartest kid in the class, couldn't be the tallest and all the while your parents told you were special.Ignorance is bliss. Most here do not even have a basic understanding of the AR15 operating system to be able to have an educated opinion on the subject, much less enough they should be giving advice.
You are a great example. ANY properly built AR is going to have issues cyclying wolf or similar underpowered ammo in the extreme cold. Its called physics and if your gun is running that it means its massively overgassed and beating the subpar lowest bidder parts to shit, accelerating wear and MRBTF. The fact you do not know this means you should not be telling anyone anything about this platform, except maybe your favorite color.
Complete ignorant non qualified statements by people who do not know what they are talking about. Unless you have proven a gun model, in a statistical sample size and volume of testing to be significant, you are talking out of your ass.
Again, Ignorance is bliss.
I'm not questioning your military service, nor do I really care. But you specifically stated you had "first-hand knowledge" of how the geissele SD "Shit the Bed" when in fact all you're doing is regurgitating some complaints you heard.
What year was this?
Geissele is not a Gucci firearm by any means, it is however a step above BCM and DD.
Not at MFF but my squadron got me some a year prior to going. Fortunately I am one of those people who legitimately fall dead stable. You could have held a yardstick between me and my instructor and not moved it.
But I do fall like a fucking rock. I have to have my pins out 250 above everyone else to open on the same level with them.
really? how so
DD shouldn't be mentioned any longer with their anti 2A nonsense but curious why you think Geiselle, an untested rifle with zero history mind you, is suddenly a step above?
Put the SD next to the DD and you immediately see the difference in the quality of their machining work.
I absolutely hate the handguard design of the DD because all four of those screws are exposed and the heads can be easily damaged.
The SD utilizes their version of the intermediate gas system on their 16" and 14.5 similar to what KAC uses.
Obviously the triggers that come in are better than what comes in a standard DD.
The barrels are a wash they're both CHF CL.
The Ambi geissele airborne charging handles are better than anything that comes in a DD....
There's a bunch more just next time you can get the both of them together take a look for yourself.
What is there is what you get. And looking guys in the eye who tell me their SD shit the bed last night is good enough for me. One of them is my best friend.
he's talking like a guy who uses fit and finish to describe a weapon. he's already on the 'won't be engaging this cat again'Strange, my DD MK18 held up to 4 years of CQB, tens of thousands of rounds, airborne ops, and jungle warfare in Africa just fine.
I could even loosen my screws as the heads weren't damaged.
And that rifle saw some hard service. I maintained it but I didn't baby it.
he's talking like a guy who uses fit and finish to describe a weapon. he's already on the 'won't be engaging this cat again'
nuggets like; barrels are a wash because of chf and charging handles comparison......etc.
none of that actually answered the question and he sounds like a kid reading a spec sheet
this board is getting more an more like arfcom
he's talking like a guy who uses fit and finish to describe a weapon. he's already on the 'won't be engaging this cat again'
nuggets like; barrels are a wash because of chf and charging handles comparison......etc.
none of that actually answered the question and he sounds like a kid reading a spec sheet
this board is getting more an more like arfcom
…there are people on here who actually used stuff professionally before.
Tooo much this.Usually that means they used whatever they were handed. LOL
That’s what always made me laugh about guys who are in love with “mil spec” Mil-spec, mil-spec, gotta be Mil-spec. You bitched about every single piece of gear you used the entire time you were in, yet somehow it’s magically wonderful and the best of the best because it meets some minimum requirement for some hammer pin or the exterior contour of a receiver.![]()
Has anyone recommended a piston gun yet?
I try to avoid fanboi-ism at all costs. It blinds you to good options when they come along.Since I know many of you have questions and since @bigjake83 feels the need to defend the penis enlargement capabilities of the super duty he has in the safe, I will elaborate as much as I can.
I spent 6 years in SOF and then left the military to go overseas and do the things for a while.
While doing the things, one meets many interesting peoples, including some peoples who are using super duty rifles.
When one sits across the chow hall tables and listens to the bitching of the peoples who are using the super dutys to do the things about how the super dutys don't always do the things without shitting the bed, one is interested.
When one is interested as to how a super fucking expensive rifle bought on a classified contract is having problems where the rifle operates like it hasn't been lubed at all and then was shot for 500 rounds, one pays attention.
When the peoples go back to using their previous rifles because they FUCKING DEMANDED them back from the armory that is a statement. Especially when the previous rifles were heavy as fuck.
Basically what was happening was the rifles were lubed properly (most of these guys had been doing Tier 1 level stuff for at least a decade, so they know how to maintain their stuff, ok?) the rifles were acting like they weren't lubed and extremely fouled. Short stroking, not locking, jamming halfway closed on a round partially fed due to not enough force to close the bolt, etc. All manner of remedies were tried, and believe me, these folks could ask for and get any remedy, but the final remedy was to get rid of the "Super Doody". As far as could be discovered, it seemed that geissele built a super tight clearanced match gun that was so tight that as soon as you shot it a bit and got it around helos in the desert the particulate in the gun caused it to jam.
They are sweet range guns and display guns though, lol, and by now maybe Geissele has fixed their shit and the rifles at least run as well as a 500 dollar PSA blaster.
Oh, and lest anyone think I am bullshitting (@bigjake83 ) let me help you out a bit. Since the contract was classified for the rifles and I can't give you that, maybe this will help:
View attachment 7849964
The bolded above is accurate. First hand knowledge would've been personally witnessing the types of problems, numbers of, rate of, frequency of, etc.I'm not questioning your military service, nor do I really care. But you specifically stated you had "first-hand knowledge" of how the geissele SD "Shit the Bed" when in fact all you're doing is regurgitating some complaints you heard.
What year was this?
Geissele is not a Gucci firearm by any means, it is however a step above BCM and DD.
The bolded above is accurate. First hand knowledge would've been personally witnessing the types of problems, numbers of, rate of, frequency of, etc.
The OP's strong feelings might have been justified had he personally observed more than a few G SD carbines go down and had metrics to base his claims on.
But I don't doubt that a couple of SecCons may have had issues with new Geissele rifles- in the end, even Colt and FN have shipped some out of spec rifles and components because perfection is impossible.
Diamondback, Taurus, and Anderson- for the win.
I really wish Lorcin, Jennings, and Raven would get into the tactical rifle game.
And even then, you could be one round away from a failure at that point.at least there’s one very common thread of agreement in here which should be stamped on some people’s foreheads: “No rifle is guaranteed reliable until it’s had a decent amount of ammo through it without stoppage.” which you can conveniently do while training with said rifle
Not according to Glock, oh wait....The bolded above is accurate. First hand knowledge would've been personally witnessing the types of problems, numbers of, rate of, frequency of, etc.
The OP's strong feelings might have been justified had he personally observed more than a few G SD carbines go down and had metrics to base his claims on.
But I don't doubt that a couple of SecCons may have had issues with new Geissele rifles- in the end, even Colt and FN have shipped some out of spec rifles and components because perfection is impossible.
I can see it happening. Unlimited black budgets and someone wanted a cool toy.I'm also surprised that someone just ordered the things and said "here you go." No testing it looks like.