It was a thought.
I don't know exactly what effect the shorter barrel length has on the muzzle velocity of subs and my Gordon's is on the blink because I switched from Linux to Apple for work compatibility and I don't own a copy of Quickload which doesn't work on Apple anyway. But I may fire up a Linux machine just to do some internal ballistics calculations.
The generally accepted "wisdom" for super loads is a bullet loses between 25-50fps per inch the barrel is shortened so if S&B used a 24" barrel and you are using a 20" barrel then it may be 100-200fps slower out of your rifle but no way to know the true number without a chrony.
Just like regular ammo the performance of sub's can vary significantly from one rifle to the next so if you don't verify muzzle velocity there is no "science" in the comparison. Without knowing the *actual* muzzle velocity there's no way of knowing if the drop you recorded is the expected drop. This is why a lot of people, as
@armorpl8chikn said while I was typing this, roll their own subs for their particular rifle configuration. Not adjusting the optic before switching to subs makes it even a little bit less "sciency".
If it's OK to hunt with 300BLK subs then it's OK to hunt with 308 subs because they are the exact same thing.
The "point" of 308 subs is someone can get exactly the same ballistic performance of 300BLK subs without having to buy a whole new platform. The only thing you're giving up is the cycling of semi-auto performance that 300BLK delivers. Same thing applies for 45 subs or 9mm subs just like
@hlee said it's really hard to chamber a 45 in a 308 so the "reason" for 308 subs is I don't have a 45.
This is no different than the comparison between .458 SOCOM subs and 45-70 subs ... they are both capable of shooting basically the same bullet but one is readily available in semi-auto and the other isn't.