Re: MagnetoSpeed Chronograph Review
I managed to conduct my promised group comparison between MagnetoSpeed and no-MagnetoSpeed volleys.
First the target scans, then the discussion. BTW, the dividing lines on the targets are half-inch and the range is 100 yards. Also, the group from the second target was copied and pasted (colorized with blue) on the first target to make visual comparison easier.
Here's the 41.2 gr N135, .308 Win, Sierra 175gr MKHP comparison:
Velocities for the 1.789" group:
2678
2685
2679
2680
2670
Here's the 40.9 gr N135, .308 Win, Sierra 175gr MKHP comparison:
Velocities for the 1.143" group:
2689
2669
2666
2649
2682
I apologize for the crummy shooting. I don't know if it was me, or the new detachable rings I was trying out. Regardless, the shape and placement of the groups leads me to believe that the MagnetoSpeed does not appear to seriously affect accuracy.
In the first comparison, the naked barrel group is smaller than the MagnetoSpeed mounted group, but the second comparison features a smaller MagnetoSpeed group.
In both comparisons, the vertical deflection is around 1.5 to 2 inches. Horizontal deflection appears to be affected by cant, so the user should ensure the MagnetoSpeed is vertical.
I discovered something about the micro-SD disk. I was trying out a spare 8GB disk I had lying around and was getting "Clock Overflow" when I tried to "Archive Series". When I switched back to the 1GB disk that came with the unit, everything worked fine. I will report this problem to the MagnetoSpeed folks for their comment. <span style="color: #FF0000">(Update: The chronograph can write only to a FAT16 formatted Micro-SD disk. That limits disk size to 2GB.)</span>
I hope this data is useful to someone.
Disclaimer: mentioned load data may not be safe in your rifle. Use manufacturer recommended load data for developing your own safe cartridges.